Existence of transverse homotopy between knots in a 3-manifold












4












$begingroup$


I have a 3-manifold $Sigma$ and two homotopic embedded knots $K_{0}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$ and $K_{1}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$. I wish to refine the homotopy between them to a "transverse homotopy" i.e, some $H(s,t)$ such that




  • $s in {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is a singular knot with one crossing i.e, there are only two points $t_{1},t_{2}in[0,1]$ such that $H(s,t_{1})=H(s,t_{2})$.


  • $s in [0,1]backslash {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is an embedded knot.



In definition 2.1 of Type 1 knot invariants in 3-manifolds (bottom of page 5) the authors state that a transverse homotopy always exists between any two homotopic knots.



I'd like to know how to prove this statement.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I have a 3-manifold $Sigma$ and two homotopic embedded knots $K_{0}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$ and $K_{1}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$. I wish to refine the homotopy between them to a "transverse homotopy" i.e, some $H(s,t)$ such that




    • $s in {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is a singular knot with one crossing i.e, there are only two points $t_{1},t_{2}in[0,1]$ such that $H(s,t_{1})=H(s,t_{2})$.


    • $s in [0,1]backslash {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is an embedded knot.



    In definition 2.1 of Type 1 knot invariants in 3-manifolds (bottom of page 5) the authors state that a transverse homotopy always exists between any two homotopic knots.



    I'd like to know how to prove this statement.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I have a 3-manifold $Sigma$ and two homotopic embedded knots $K_{0}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$ and $K_{1}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$. I wish to refine the homotopy between them to a "transverse homotopy" i.e, some $H(s,t)$ such that




      • $s in {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is a singular knot with one crossing i.e, there are only two points $t_{1},t_{2}in[0,1]$ such that $H(s,t_{1})=H(s,t_{2})$.


      • $s in [0,1]backslash {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is an embedded knot.



      In definition 2.1 of Type 1 knot invariants in 3-manifolds (bottom of page 5) the authors state that a transverse homotopy always exists between any two homotopic knots.



      I'd like to know how to prove this statement.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have a 3-manifold $Sigma$ and two homotopic embedded knots $K_{0}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$ and $K_{1}(t): S^{1} to Sigma$. I wish to refine the homotopy between them to a "transverse homotopy" i.e, some $H(s,t)$ such that




      • $s in {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is a singular knot with one crossing i.e, there are only two points $t_{1},t_{2}in[0,1]$ such that $H(s,t_{1})=H(s,t_{2})$.


      • $s in [0,1]backslash {s_{0},ldots,s_{n}} Rightarrow H(s,t)$ is an embedded knot.



      In definition 2.1 of Type 1 knot invariants in 3-manifolds (bottom of page 5) the authors state that a transverse homotopy always exists between any two homotopic knots.



      I'd like to know how to prove this statement.







      algebraic-topology manifolds knot-theory knot-invariants






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 6 '18 at 17:44









      Mike KissMike Kiss

      234




      234






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $h : S^1 times I to Sigma$ is a smooth homotopy between the knots $K_0 = h(-, 0)$ and $K_1 = h(-, 1)$. Consider the movie $f : S^1 times I to Sigma times I$ of the homotopy, defined by $f(x, t) = (h(x, t), t)$.



          I claim that $f$ is homotopic, relative to it's boundary, to a map $g$ which is an immersion with transverse double points, i.e., $g$ is an embedding away from finitely many points $x_1, y_1, cdots, x_n, y_n in S^1 times I$ such that $g(x_k) = g(y_k) = p_k$ for $1 leq k leq n$ and $text{im} ,dg_{x_k} pitchfork text{im} , dg_{y_k}$. This follows from a self-transversality theorem that I have stated and given a sketch of proof below.



          As a matter of fact $g$ can be chosen to be $C^1$-close to $f$ as well. $f$ was completely horizontal to $Sigma$, i.e., if we denote $f_t = f|S^1 times {t}$ to be the restriction on the $t$-slice, $f_t' subset (dpi)^*TSigma$ where $pi : Sigma times I to Sigma$ is the projection. Therefore $g_t (=g|S^1 times {t})$ must be $varepsilon$-horizontal to $Sigma$, and in particular, $g_t' notin ker dpi$. This would mean $pi circ g_t$ is an immersion for all $t in I$.



          Note that this is almost enough for what you want: Take $H = pi_Sigma circ g$ to be your new homotopy. This is a homotopy of $K_0$ to $K_1$ through immersions, and the only difficulty is that $H_t$ might stay on a singular knot for an interval's worth of time $t in J subset I$, whereas you want it to stay there for only finitely many points in $I$. Locally near a crossing, $(H_t)_{t in I}$ would look like a pair of undercrossing-overcrossing which gradually grows closer, stays in the position of "$mathsf{X}$" for the interval $t in J$ and then grows apart and becomes a pair of overcrossing-undercrossing. We modify $H$ near those points so that it only stays like an "$mathsf{X}$" for a point $t = t_0 in J$. Then further modify $H$ so that double points are introduced one at a time, i.e, $H_t$ has at most one double point.





          Suppose $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold and $N$ is a compact $2n$-manifold. Let $C^infty(M, N)$ be the space of smooth maps and $text{Imm}(M, N)$ be the subspace of such maps which are immersions.



          Call a map $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ to be an immersion with clean double points if whenever $x, y in M$, and $f(x) = f(y) = p$, there exists charts $U, V$ around $x, y$ respectively such that $f|_U, f|_V$ are embeddings, $f(U)$ intersects $f(V)$ transversely, and $f(U) cap f(V) = {p}$. Denote the subspace of such maps as $text{Imm}_{pitchfork}(M, N)$



          Theorem (Self-transversality of maps): $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M^n, N^{2n})$ is dense in $C^infty(M^n, N^{2n})$.



          Let $J^1(M, N)$ be the space of $1$-jets of maps $M to N$ and $mathscr{S} subset J^1(M, N)$ be the subset of $1$-jets of non-immersions. The space of $1$-jets is an affine bundle $M_{2n times n}(Bbb R) to J^1(M, N) to M times N$ with fiber keeping track of the formal derivative component. Let $Sigma_{< n} subset M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)$ be the stratified subset of matrices of rank strictly less than $n$. As $mathscr{S}$ fibers over $M times N$ with fiber $Sigma_{< n}$, it is also a stratified subset of $J^1(M, N)$.



          Given any map $f in C^infty(M, N)$, consider it's 1-jet prolongation $j^1 f : M to J^1(M, N)$. By Thom transversality theorem, we can homotope $f$ by a $C^1$-small homotopy to $g in C^infty(M, N)$ such that $j^1 g pitchfork mathscr{S}$. But observe that $dim J^1(M, N) = n(2n+3)$, so $text{codim}, j^1g(M) = dim J^1(M, N)$ $- dim M$ $=$ $2n(n+1)$ whereas $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $=$ $text{codim}_{M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)} Sigma_{< n}$ $=$ $n+1$, so $text{codim}, j^1 g(M)$ $+$ $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $>$ $dim J^1(M, N)$, forcing $j^1 g$ to be disjoint from $mathscr{S}$. This implies $j^1 g$ has rank $n$ everywhere, i.e., $g$ is an immersion.



          This implies $text{Imm}(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$. Now for any $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ consider the map $F : M times M to N times N$, $F(x, y) = (f(x), f(y))$. By a $C^1$-small homotopy we can modify $F$ to $G$ so that $G$ is transverse to the diagonal $Delta_N subset N times N$. Let $G|Delta_M$ be the restriction to the diagonal of $M times M$. As $G$ is $C^1$-close to $F$, image of $G|Delta_M$ fits inside an $epsilon$-neighborhood of $Delta_N subset N times N$, and by $epsilon$-neighborhood theorem we have a normal projection map to $Delta_N$, with which we compose to get a map $g : M to N$. $g times g$ is $C^1$-close to $G$ near $Delta_M$, and since $G pitchfork Delta_N$, by stability of transverse maps, $(g times g) pitchfork Delta_M$ should hold as well. Therefore $g in text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$.



          This implies we have a tower of successively dense subspaces $$text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N) subset text{Imm}(M, N) subset C^infty(M, N)$$
          In particular, $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$, as required. (Note that for the above we need a relative-to-boundary version of this, but once $f$ is already an embedding restricted to (a collar neighborhood of) the boundary, we can do all the required homotopies fixing the boundary.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Kiss
            Dec 7 '18 at 14:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Balarka Sen
            Dec 7 '18 at 15:57











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028815%2fexistence-of-transverse-homotopy-between-knots-in-a-3-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $h : S^1 times I to Sigma$ is a smooth homotopy between the knots $K_0 = h(-, 0)$ and $K_1 = h(-, 1)$. Consider the movie $f : S^1 times I to Sigma times I$ of the homotopy, defined by $f(x, t) = (h(x, t), t)$.



          I claim that $f$ is homotopic, relative to it's boundary, to a map $g$ which is an immersion with transverse double points, i.e., $g$ is an embedding away from finitely many points $x_1, y_1, cdots, x_n, y_n in S^1 times I$ such that $g(x_k) = g(y_k) = p_k$ for $1 leq k leq n$ and $text{im} ,dg_{x_k} pitchfork text{im} , dg_{y_k}$. This follows from a self-transversality theorem that I have stated and given a sketch of proof below.



          As a matter of fact $g$ can be chosen to be $C^1$-close to $f$ as well. $f$ was completely horizontal to $Sigma$, i.e., if we denote $f_t = f|S^1 times {t}$ to be the restriction on the $t$-slice, $f_t' subset (dpi)^*TSigma$ where $pi : Sigma times I to Sigma$ is the projection. Therefore $g_t (=g|S^1 times {t})$ must be $varepsilon$-horizontal to $Sigma$, and in particular, $g_t' notin ker dpi$. This would mean $pi circ g_t$ is an immersion for all $t in I$.



          Note that this is almost enough for what you want: Take $H = pi_Sigma circ g$ to be your new homotopy. This is a homotopy of $K_0$ to $K_1$ through immersions, and the only difficulty is that $H_t$ might stay on a singular knot for an interval's worth of time $t in J subset I$, whereas you want it to stay there for only finitely many points in $I$. Locally near a crossing, $(H_t)_{t in I}$ would look like a pair of undercrossing-overcrossing which gradually grows closer, stays in the position of "$mathsf{X}$" for the interval $t in J$ and then grows apart and becomes a pair of overcrossing-undercrossing. We modify $H$ near those points so that it only stays like an "$mathsf{X}$" for a point $t = t_0 in J$. Then further modify $H$ so that double points are introduced one at a time, i.e, $H_t$ has at most one double point.





          Suppose $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold and $N$ is a compact $2n$-manifold. Let $C^infty(M, N)$ be the space of smooth maps and $text{Imm}(M, N)$ be the subspace of such maps which are immersions.



          Call a map $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ to be an immersion with clean double points if whenever $x, y in M$, and $f(x) = f(y) = p$, there exists charts $U, V$ around $x, y$ respectively such that $f|_U, f|_V$ are embeddings, $f(U)$ intersects $f(V)$ transversely, and $f(U) cap f(V) = {p}$. Denote the subspace of such maps as $text{Imm}_{pitchfork}(M, N)$



          Theorem (Self-transversality of maps): $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M^n, N^{2n})$ is dense in $C^infty(M^n, N^{2n})$.



          Let $J^1(M, N)$ be the space of $1$-jets of maps $M to N$ and $mathscr{S} subset J^1(M, N)$ be the subset of $1$-jets of non-immersions. The space of $1$-jets is an affine bundle $M_{2n times n}(Bbb R) to J^1(M, N) to M times N$ with fiber keeping track of the formal derivative component. Let $Sigma_{< n} subset M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)$ be the stratified subset of matrices of rank strictly less than $n$. As $mathscr{S}$ fibers over $M times N$ with fiber $Sigma_{< n}$, it is also a stratified subset of $J^1(M, N)$.



          Given any map $f in C^infty(M, N)$, consider it's 1-jet prolongation $j^1 f : M to J^1(M, N)$. By Thom transversality theorem, we can homotope $f$ by a $C^1$-small homotopy to $g in C^infty(M, N)$ such that $j^1 g pitchfork mathscr{S}$. But observe that $dim J^1(M, N) = n(2n+3)$, so $text{codim}, j^1g(M) = dim J^1(M, N)$ $- dim M$ $=$ $2n(n+1)$ whereas $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $=$ $text{codim}_{M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)} Sigma_{< n}$ $=$ $n+1$, so $text{codim}, j^1 g(M)$ $+$ $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $>$ $dim J^1(M, N)$, forcing $j^1 g$ to be disjoint from $mathscr{S}$. This implies $j^1 g$ has rank $n$ everywhere, i.e., $g$ is an immersion.



          This implies $text{Imm}(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$. Now for any $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ consider the map $F : M times M to N times N$, $F(x, y) = (f(x), f(y))$. By a $C^1$-small homotopy we can modify $F$ to $G$ so that $G$ is transverse to the diagonal $Delta_N subset N times N$. Let $G|Delta_M$ be the restriction to the diagonal of $M times M$. As $G$ is $C^1$-close to $F$, image of $G|Delta_M$ fits inside an $epsilon$-neighborhood of $Delta_N subset N times N$, and by $epsilon$-neighborhood theorem we have a normal projection map to $Delta_N$, with which we compose to get a map $g : M to N$. $g times g$ is $C^1$-close to $G$ near $Delta_M$, and since $G pitchfork Delta_N$, by stability of transverse maps, $(g times g) pitchfork Delta_M$ should hold as well. Therefore $g in text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$.



          This implies we have a tower of successively dense subspaces $$text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N) subset text{Imm}(M, N) subset C^infty(M, N)$$
          In particular, $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$, as required. (Note that for the above we need a relative-to-boundary version of this, but once $f$ is already an embedding restricted to (a collar neighborhood of) the boundary, we can do all the required homotopies fixing the boundary.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Kiss
            Dec 7 '18 at 14:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Balarka Sen
            Dec 7 '18 at 15:57
















          4












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $h : S^1 times I to Sigma$ is a smooth homotopy between the knots $K_0 = h(-, 0)$ and $K_1 = h(-, 1)$. Consider the movie $f : S^1 times I to Sigma times I$ of the homotopy, defined by $f(x, t) = (h(x, t), t)$.



          I claim that $f$ is homotopic, relative to it's boundary, to a map $g$ which is an immersion with transverse double points, i.e., $g$ is an embedding away from finitely many points $x_1, y_1, cdots, x_n, y_n in S^1 times I$ such that $g(x_k) = g(y_k) = p_k$ for $1 leq k leq n$ and $text{im} ,dg_{x_k} pitchfork text{im} , dg_{y_k}$. This follows from a self-transversality theorem that I have stated and given a sketch of proof below.



          As a matter of fact $g$ can be chosen to be $C^1$-close to $f$ as well. $f$ was completely horizontal to $Sigma$, i.e., if we denote $f_t = f|S^1 times {t}$ to be the restriction on the $t$-slice, $f_t' subset (dpi)^*TSigma$ where $pi : Sigma times I to Sigma$ is the projection. Therefore $g_t (=g|S^1 times {t})$ must be $varepsilon$-horizontal to $Sigma$, and in particular, $g_t' notin ker dpi$. This would mean $pi circ g_t$ is an immersion for all $t in I$.



          Note that this is almost enough for what you want: Take $H = pi_Sigma circ g$ to be your new homotopy. This is a homotopy of $K_0$ to $K_1$ through immersions, and the only difficulty is that $H_t$ might stay on a singular knot for an interval's worth of time $t in J subset I$, whereas you want it to stay there for only finitely many points in $I$. Locally near a crossing, $(H_t)_{t in I}$ would look like a pair of undercrossing-overcrossing which gradually grows closer, stays in the position of "$mathsf{X}$" for the interval $t in J$ and then grows apart and becomes a pair of overcrossing-undercrossing. We modify $H$ near those points so that it only stays like an "$mathsf{X}$" for a point $t = t_0 in J$. Then further modify $H$ so that double points are introduced one at a time, i.e, $H_t$ has at most one double point.





          Suppose $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold and $N$ is a compact $2n$-manifold. Let $C^infty(M, N)$ be the space of smooth maps and $text{Imm}(M, N)$ be the subspace of such maps which are immersions.



          Call a map $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ to be an immersion with clean double points if whenever $x, y in M$, and $f(x) = f(y) = p$, there exists charts $U, V$ around $x, y$ respectively such that $f|_U, f|_V$ are embeddings, $f(U)$ intersects $f(V)$ transversely, and $f(U) cap f(V) = {p}$. Denote the subspace of such maps as $text{Imm}_{pitchfork}(M, N)$



          Theorem (Self-transversality of maps): $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M^n, N^{2n})$ is dense in $C^infty(M^n, N^{2n})$.



          Let $J^1(M, N)$ be the space of $1$-jets of maps $M to N$ and $mathscr{S} subset J^1(M, N)$ be the subset of $1$-jets of non-immersions. The space of $1$-jets is an affine bundle $M_{2n times n}(Bbb R) to J^1(M, N) to M times N$ with fiber keeping track of the formal derivative component. Let $Sigma_{< n} subset M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)$ be the stratified subset of matrices of rank strictly less than $n$. As $mathscr{S}$ fibers over $M times N$ with fiber $Sigma_{< n}$, it is also a stratified subset of $J^1(M, N)$.



          Given any map $f in C^infty(M, N)$, consider it's 1-jet prolongation $j^1 f : M to J^1(M, N)$. By Thom transversality theorem, we can homotope $f$ by a $C^1$-small homotopy to $g in C^infty(M, N)$ such that $j^1 g pitchfork mathscr{S}$. But observe that $dim J^1(M, N) = n(2n+3)$, so $text{codim}, j^1g(M) = dim J^1(M, N)$ $- dim M$ $=$ $2n(n+1)$ whereas $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $=$ $text{codim}_{M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)} Sigma_{< n}$ $=$ $n+1$, so $text{codim}, j^1 g(M)$ $+$ $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $>$ $dim J^1(M, N)$, forcing $j^1 g$ to be disjoint from $mathscr{S}$. This implies $j^1 g$ has rank $n$ everywhere, i.e., $g$ is an immersion.



          This implies $text{Imm}(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$. Now for any $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ consider the map $F : M times M to N times N$, $F(x, y) = (f(x), f(y))$. By a $C^1$-small homotopy we can modify $F$ to $G$ so that $G$ is transverse to the diagonal $Delta_N subset N times N$. Let $G|Delta_M$ be the restriction to the diagonal of $M times M$. As $G$ is $C^1$-close to $F$, image of $G|Delta_M$ fits inside an $epsilon$-neighborhood of $Delta_N subset N times N$, and by $epsilon$-neighborhood theorem we have a normal projection map to $Delta_N$, with which we compose to get a map $g : M to N$. $g times g$ is $C^1$-close to $G$ near $Delta_M$, and since $G pitchfork Delta_N$, by stability of transverse maps, $(g times g) pitchfork Delta_M$ should hold as well. Therefore $g in text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$.



          This implies we have a tower of successively dense subspaces $$text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N) subset text{Imm}(M, N) subset C^infty(M, N)$$
          In particular, $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$, as required. (Note that for the above we need a relative-to-boundary version of this, but once $f$ is already an embedding restricted to (a collar neighborhood of) the boundary, we can do all the required homotopies fixing the boundary.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Kiss
            Dec 7 '18 at 14:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Balarka Sen
            Dec 7 '18 at 15:57














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Suppose $h : S^1 times I to Sigma$ is a smooth homotopy between the knots $K_0 = h(-, 0)$ and $K_1 = h(-, 1)$. Consider the movie $f : S^1 times I to Sigma times I$ of the homotopy, defined by $f(x, t) = (h(x, t), t)$.



          I claim that $f$ is homotopic, relative to it's boundary, to a map $g$ which is an immersion with transverse double points, i.e., $g$ is an embedding away from finitely many points $x_1, y_1, cdots, x_n, y_n in S^1 times I$ such that $g(x_k) = g(y_k) = p_k$ for $1 leq k leq n$ and $text{im} ,dg_{x_k} pitchfork text{im} , dg_{y_k}$. This follows from a self-transversality theorem that I have stated and given a sketch of proof below.



          As a matter of fact $g$ can be chosen to be $C^1$-close to $f$ as well. $f$ was completely horizontal to $Sigma$, i.e., if we denote $f_t = f|S^1 times {t}$ to be the restriction on the $t$-slice, $f_t' subset (dpi)^*TSigma$ where $pi : Sigma times I to Sigma$ is the projection. Therefore $g_t (=g|S^1 times {t})$ must be $varepsilon$-horizontal to $Sigma$, and in particular, $g_t' notin ker dpi$. This would mean $pi circ g_t$ is an immersion for all $t in I$.



          Note that this is almost enough for what you want: Take $H = pi_Sigma circ g$ to be your new homotopy. This is a homotopy of $K_0$ to $K_1$ through immersions, and the only difficulty is that $H_t$ might stay on a singular knot for an interval's worth of time $t in J subset I$, whereas you want it to stay there for only finitely many points in $I$. Locally near a crossing, $(H_t)_{t in I}$ would look like a pair of undercrossing-overcrossing which gradually grows closer, stays in the position of "$mathsf{X}$" for the interval $t in J$ and then grows apart and becomes a pair of overcrossing-undercrossing. We modify $H$ near those points so that it only stays like an "$mathsf{X}$" for a point $t = t_0 in J$. Then further modify $H$ so that double points are introduced one at a time, i.e, $H_t$ has at most one double point.





          Suppose $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold and $N$ is a compact $2n$-manifold. Let $C^infty(M, N)$ be the space of smooth maps and $text{Imm}(M, N)$ be the subspace of such maps which are immersions.



          Call a map $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ to be an immersion with clean double points if whenever $x, y in M$, and $f(x) = f(y) = p$, there exists charts $U, V$ around $x, y$ respectively such that $f|_U, f|_V$ are embeddings, $f(U)$ intersects $f(V)$ transversely, and $f(U) cap f(V) = {p}$. Denote the subspace of such maps as $text{Imm}_{pitchfork}(M, N)$



          Theorem (Self-transversality of maps): $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M^n, N^{2n})$ is dense in $C^infty(M^n, N^{2n})$.



          Let $J^1(M, N)$ be the space of $1$-jets of maps $M to N$ and $mathscr{S} subset J^1(M, N)$ be the subset of $1$-jets of non-immersions. The space of $1$-jets is an affine bundle $M_{2n times n}(Bbb R) to J^1(M, N) to M times N$ with fiber keeping track of the formal derivative component. Let $Sigma_{< n} subset M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)$ be the stratified subset of matrices of rank strictly less than $n$. As $mathscr{S}$ fibers over $M times N$ with fiber $Sigma_{< n}$, it is also a stratified subset of $J^1(M, N)$.



          Given any map $f in C^infty(M, N)$, consider it's 1-jet prolongation $j^1 f : M to J^1(M, N)$. By Thom transversality theorem, we can homotope $f$ by a $C^1$-small homotopy to $g in C^infty(M, N)$ such that $j^1 g pitchfork mathscr{S}$. But observe that $dim J^1(M, N) = n(2n+3)$, so $text{codim}, j^1g(M) = dim J^1(M, N)$ $- dim M$ $=$ $2n(n+1)$ whereas $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $=$ $text{codim}_{M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)} Sigma_{< n}$ $=$ $n+1$, so $text{codim}, j^1 g(M)$ $+$ $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $>$ $dim J^1(M, N)$, forcing $j^1 g$ to be disjoint from $mathscr{S}$. This implies $j^1 g$ has rank $n$ everywhere, i.e., $g$ is an immersion.



          This implies $text{Imm}(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$. Now for any $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ consider the map $F : M times M to N times N$, $F(x, y) = (f(x), f(y))$. By a $C^1$-small homotopy we can modify $F$ to $G$ so that $G$ is transverse to the diagonal $Delta_N subset N times N$. Let $G|Delta_M$ be the restriction to the diagonal of $M times M$. As $G$ is $C^1$-close to $F$, image of $G|Delta_M$ fits inside an $epsilon$-neighborhood of $Delta_N subset N times N$, and by $epsilon$-neighborhood theorem we have a normal projection map to $Delta_N$, with which we compose to get a map $g : M to N$. $g times g$ is $C^1$-close to $G$ near $Delta_M$, and since $G pitchfork Delta_N$, by stability of transverse maps, $(g times g) pitchfork Delta_M$ should hold as well. Therefore $g in text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$.



          This implies we have a tower of successively dense subspaces $$text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N) subset text{Imm}(M, N) subset C^infty(M, N)$$
          In particular, $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$, as required. (Note that for the above we need a relative-to-boundary version of this, but once $f$ is already an embedding restricted to (a collar neighborhood of) the boundary, we can do all the required homotopies fixing the boundary.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Suppose $h : S^1 times I to Sigma$ is a smooth homotopy between the knots $K_0 = h(-, 0)$ and $K_1 = h(-, 1)$. Consider the movie $f : S^1 times I to Sigma times I$ of the homotopy, defined by $f(x, t) = (h(x, t), t)$.



          I claim that $f$ is homotopic, relative to it's boundary, to a map $g$ which is an immersion with transverse double points, i.e., $g$ is an embedding away from finitely many points $x_1, y_1, cdots, x_n, y_n in S^1 times I$ such that $g(x_k) = g(y_k) = p_k$ for $1 leq k leq n$ and $text{im} ,dg_{x_k} pitchfork text{im} , dg_{y_k}$. This follows from a self-transversality theorem that I have stated and given a sketch of proof below.



          As a matter of fact $g$ can be chosen to be $C^1$-close to $f$ as well. $f$ was completely horizontal to $Sigma$, i.e., if we denote $f_t = f|S^1 times {t}$ to be the restriction on the $t$-slice, $f_t' subset (dpi)^*TSigma$ where $pi : Sigma times I to Sigma$ is the projection. Therefore $g_t (=g|S^1 times {t})$ must be $varepsilon$-horizontal to $Sigma$, and in particular, $g_t' notin ker dpi$. This would mean $pi circ g_t$ is an immersion for all $t in I$.



          Note that this is almost enough for what you want: Take $H = pi_Sigma circ g$ to be your new homotopy. This is a homotopy of $K_0$ to $K_1$ through immersions, and the only difficulty is that $H_t$ might stay on a singular knot for an interval's worth of time $t in J subset I$, whereas you want it to stay there for only finitely many points in $I$. Locally near a crossing, $(H_t)_{t in I}$ would look like a pair of undercrossing-overcrossing which gradually grows closer, stays in the position of "$mathsf{X}$" for the interval $t in J$ and then grows apart and becomes a pair of overcrossing-undercrossing. We modify $H$ near those points so that it only stays like an "$mathsf{X}$" for a point $t = t_0 in J$. Then further modify $H$ so that double points are introduced one at a time, i.e, $H_t$ has at most one double point.





          Suppose $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold and $N$ is a compact $2n$-manifold. Let $C^infty(M, N)$ be the space of smooth maps and $text{Imm}(M, N)$ be the subspace of such maps which are immersions.



          Call a map $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ to be an immersion with clean double points if whenever $x, y in M$, and $f(x) = f(y) = p$, there exists charts $U, V$ around $x, y$ respectively such that $f|_U, f|_V$ are embeddings, $f(U)$ intersects $f(V)$ transversely, and $f(U) cap f(V) = {p}$. Denote the subspace of such maps as $text{Imm}_{pitchfork}(M, N)$



          Theorem (Self-transversality of maps): $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M^n, N^{2n})$ is dense in $C^infty(M^n, N^{2n})$.



          Let $J^1(M, N)$ be the space of $1$-jets of maps $M to N$ and $mathscr{S} subset J^1(M, N)$ be the subset of $1$-jets of non-immersions. The space of $1$-jets is an affine bundle $M_{2n times n}(Bbb R) to J^1(M, N) to M times N$ with fiber keeping track of the formal derivative component. Let $Sigma_{< n} subset M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)$ be the stratified subset of matrices of rank strictly less than $n$. As $mathscr{S}$ fibers over $M times N$ with fiber $Sigma_{< n}$, it is also a stratified subset of $J^1(M, N)$.



          Given any map $f in C^infty(M, N)$, consider it's 1-jet prolongation $j^1 f : M to J^1(M, N)$. By Thom transversality theorem, we can homotope $f$ by a $C^1$-small homotopy to $g in C^infty(M, N)$ such that $j^1 g pitchfork mathscr{S}$. But observe that $dim J^1(M, N) = n(2n+3)$, so $text{codim}, j^1g(M) = dim J^1(M, N)$ $- dim M$ $=$ $2n(n+1)$ whereas $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $=$ $text{codim}_{M_{2n times n}(Bbb R)} Sigma_{< n}$ $=$ $n+1$, so $text{codim}, j^1 g(M)$ $+$ $text{codim}, mathscr{S}$ $>$ $dim J^1(M, N)$, forcing $j^1 g$ to be disjoint from $mathscr{S}$. This implies $j^1 g$ has rank $n$ everywhere, i.e., $g$ is an immersion.



          This implies $text{Imm}(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$. Now for any $f in text{Imm}(M, N)$ consider the map $F : M times M to N times N$, $F(x, y) = (f(x), f(y))$. By a $C^1$-small homotopy we can modify $F$ to $G$ so that $G$ is transverse to the diagonal $Delta_N subset N times N$. Let $G|Delta_M$ be the restriction to the diagonal of $M times M$. As $G$ is $C^1$-close to $F$, image of $G|Delta_M$ fits inside an $epsilon$-neighborhood of $Delta_N subset N times N$, and by $epsilon$-neighborhood theorem we have a normal projection map to $Delta_N$, with which we compose to get a map $g : M to N$. $g times g$ is $C^1$-close to $G$ near $Delta_M$, and since $G pitchfork Delta_N$, by stability of transverse maps, $(g times g) pitchfork Delta_M$ should hold as well. Therefore $g in text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$.



          This implies we have a tower of successively dense subspaces $$text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N) subset text{Imm}(M, N) subset C^infty(M, N)$$
          In particular, $text{Imm}_pitchfork(M, N)$ is dense in $C^infty(M, N)$, as required. (Note that for the above we need a relative-to-boundary version of this, but once $f$ is already an embedding restricted to (a collar neighborhood of) the boundary, we can do all the required homotopies fixing the boundary.)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 7 '18 at 17:16

























          answered Dec 6 '18 at 22:21









          Balarka SenBalarka Sen

          10.2k13056




          10.2k13056












          • $begingroup$
            So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Kiss
            Dec 7 '18 at 14:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Balarka Sen
            Dec 7 '18 at 15:57


















          • $begingroup$
            So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Kiss
            Dec 7 '18 at 14:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Balarka Sen
            Dec 7 '18 at 15:57
















          $begingroup$
          So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
          $endgroup$
          – Mike Kiss
          Dec 7 '18 at 14:26




          $begingroup$
          So does this result only hold if $Sigma$ is compact? Or are there analogues of the Thom transversality theorem for maps from compact n-manifolds to general 2n-manifolds?
          $endgroup$
          – Mike Kiss
          Dec 7 '18 at 14:26




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
          $endgroup$
          – Balarka Sen
          Dec 7 '18 at 15:57




          $begingroup$
          @MikeKiss Compactness of the codomain is not necessary for transversality results to hold, no. Also note that my argument on the first bit is incomplete; I proposed a possible way to fix it. I'll think about it and see if it works.
          $endgroup$
          – Balarka Sen
          Dec 7 '18 at 15:57


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028815%2fexistence-of-transverse-homotopy-between-knots-in-a-3-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?