Notations in Functional Analysis: $L^p$, $L_p$, $mathscr{L}^p$, $mathscr{L}_p$, $mathcal{L}^p$, and...
$begingroup$
If my memory doesn't fail me, then to some functional analysts, $L^p$ and $L_p$ spaces are two different things. I understand that many people use $L_p$ to means the space of functions with finite $p$-norm (i.e, $p^text{th}$-power-integrable functions), while other use the notation $L^p$ for the same purpose. If you are a functional analyst that distinguishes between $L^p$ and $L_p$, then could you please let me know what $L_p$ means (presumably, your definition of $L^p$ coincides with Wikipedia's definition)?
Now, I found another similar notation $mathscr{L}_p$. What is $mathscr{L}_p$? There seem to be $mathscr{L}^p$, $mathcal{L}^p$, and $mathcal{L}_p$ too. However, I would expect that this is just due to people's using different fonts, i.e., $L^p=mathscr{L}^p=mathcal{L}^p$ and $L_p=mathscr{L}_p=mathcal{L}_p$.
functional-analysis soft-question notation definition lp-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If my memory doesn't fail me, then to some functional analysts, $L^p$ and $L_p$ spaces are two different things. I understand that many people use $L_p$ to means the space of functions with finite $p$-norm (i.e, $p^text{th}$-power-integrable functions), while other use the notation $L^p$ for the same purpose. If you are a functional analyst that distinguishes between $L^p$ and $L_p$, then could you please let me know what $L_p$ means (presumably, your definition of $L^p$ coincides with Wikipedia's definition)?
Now, I found another similar notation $mathscr{L}_p$. What is $mathscr{L}_p$? There seem to be $mathscr{L}^p$, $mathcal{L}^p$, and $mathcal{L}_p$ too. However, I would expect that this is just due to people's using different fonts, i.e., $L^p=mathscr{L}^p=mathcal{L}^p$ and $L_p=mathscr{L}_p=mathcal{L}_p$.
functional-analysis soft-question notation definition lp-spaces
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
4
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If my memory doesn't fail me, then to some functional analysts, $L^p$ and $L_p$ spaces are two different things. I understand that many people use $L_p$ to means the space of functions with finite $p$-norm (i.e, $p^text{th}$-power-integrable functions), while other use the notation $L^p$ for the same purpose. If you are a functional analyst that distinguishes between $L^p$ and $L_p$, then could you please let me know what $L_p$ means (presumably, your definition of $L^p$ coincides with Wikipedia's definition)?
Now, I found another similar notation $mathscr{L}_p$. What is $mathscr{L}_p$? There seem to be $mathscr{L}^p$, $mathcal{L}^p$, and $mathcal{L}_p$ too. However, I would expect that this is just due to people's using different fonts, i.e., $L^p=mathscr{L}^p=mathcal{L}^p$ and $L_p=mathscr{L}_p=mathcal{L}_p$.
functional-analysis soft-question notation definition lp-spaces
$endgroup$
If my memory doesn't fail me, then to some functional analysts, $L^p$ and $L_p$ spaces are two different things. I understand that many people use $L_p$ to means the space of functions with finite $p$-norm (i.e, $p^text{th}$-power-integrable functions), while other use the notation $L^p$ for the same purpose. If you are a functional analyst that distinguishes between $L^p$ and $L_p$, then could you please let me know what $L_p$ means (presumably, your definition of $L^p$ coincides with Wikipedia's definition)?
Now, I found another similar notation $mathscr{L}_p$. What is $mathscr{L}_p$? There seem to be $mathscr{L}^p$, $mathcal{L}^p$, and $mathcal{L}_p$ too. However, I would expect that this is just due to people's using different fonts, i.e., $L^p=mathscr{L}^p=mathcal{L}^p$ and $L_p=mathscr{L}_p=mathcal{L}_p$.
functional-analysis soft-question notation definition lp-spaces
functional-analysis soft-question notation definition lp-spaces
edited Dec 12 '18 at 13:15
Batominovski
asked Dec 11 '18 at 21:03
BatominovskiBatominovski
33.1k33293
33.1k33293
3
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
4
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
4
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07
3
3
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
4
4
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035819%2fnotations-in-functional-analysis-lp-l-p-mathscrlp-mathscrl-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035819%2fnotations-in-functional-analysis-lp-l-p-mathscrlp-mathscrl-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
I have seen $L_p$ being used as the space containing actual functions with finite $Vert cdotVert_p-$norm, as opposed to $L^p$ being the space of a.e.-equivalence classes of such functions. But I don't know how common this is.
$endgroup$
– Jan Bohr
Dec 11 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction between $L_p$ spaces and $mathscr L_p$ spaces.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 11 '18 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael What are $L_p$ and $mathscr{L}_p$ in you case? (It is difficult to do a Google search on this, when Google recognizes any "Lp space" as "$L^p$ space" and nothing else.)
$endgroup$
– Batominovski
Dec 11 '18 at 21:28
4
$begingroup$
I learned it like this (from Dirk Werner personally :) )... $mathscr L^p$ denotes the space of functions with finite $||,cdot,||_p$-semi norm and $L^p$ is the space of equivalence classes $f sim g$ if $f=g$ almost everywhere. The classes are such that $||,cdot,||_p$ becomes a norm. I don't think it makes any sence to have more than two different symbols.
$endgroup$
– N.Beck
Dec 11 '18 at 22:07