Molecular orbital diagram for CH2
I'm trying to draw an MO diagram for CH2 by mimicking this MO diagram (excluding the orbital images), but things don't look like the way I want it to be. I really want to make it nice and similar to the image, but what I'm doing right now just seems sad and would really appreciate it if someone can help me.

I tried using MOdiagram package, but needs A LOT of work on it, especially with the overall size of the diagram because it is too small when I typeset. So, it would be really nice if someone can help me. Please and thank you.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{modiagram}
usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
begin{document}
begin{MOdiagram}[labels-fs=scriptsize]
AO(1cm){s}[label={2s}]{0.5;}
AO(-0.4cm){p}[label={2p}]{2;}
node at (1cm, -1){C};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(3cm){s}[label={$2mathrm{a}_1$}]{0;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={1e}]{0.9;pair}
AO(3cm){s}{1.1;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$3mathrm{a}_1$}]{2;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$4mathrm{a}_1$}]{3;}
AO(3cm){s}[label={2e}]{3.9;}
AO(3cm){s}{4.1;}
node at (3cm, -1){ce{CH_2}};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(5cm){s}[label={1s}]{2.5;}
node at (5cm, -1){H};
end{MOdiagram}
end{document}
tikz-pgf modiagram
add a comment |
I'm trying to draw an MO diagram for CH2 by mimicking this MO diagram (excluding the orbital images), but things don't look like the way I want it to be. I really want to make it nice and similar to the image, but what I'm doing right now just seems sad and would really appreciate it if someone can help me.

I tried using MOdiagram package, but needs A LOT of work on it, especially with the overall size of the diagram because it is too small when I typeset. So, it would be really nice if someone can help me. Please and thank you.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{modiagram}
usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
begin{document}
begin{MOdiagram}[labels-fs=scriptsize]
AO(1cm){s}[label={2s}]{0.5;}
AO(-0.4cm){p}[label={2p}]{2;}
node at (1cm, -1){C};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(3cm){s}[label={$2mathrm{a}_1$}]{0;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={1e}]{0.9;pair}
AO(3cm){s}{1.1;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$3mathrm{a}_1$}]{2;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$4mathrm{a}_1$}]{3;}
AO(3cm){s}[label={2e}]{3.9;}
AO(3cm){s}{4.1;}
node at (3cm, -1){ce{CH_2}};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(5cm){s}[label={1s}]{2.5;}
node at (5cm, -1){H};
end{MOdiagram}
end{document}
tikz-pgf modiagram
2
Most likelydocumentcalss{article}should bedocumentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.
– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58
add a comment |
I'm trying to draw an MO diagram for CH2 by mimicking this MO diagram (excluding the orbital images), but things don't look like the way I want it to be. I really want to make it nice and similar to the image, but what I'm doing right now just seems sad and would really appreciate it if someone can help me.

I tried using MOdiagram package, but needs A LOT of work on it, especially with the overall size of the diagram because it is too small when I typeset. So, it would be really nice if someone can help me. Please and thank you.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{modiagram}
usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
begin{document}
begin{MOdiagram}[labels-fs=scriptsize]
AO(1cm){s}[label={2s}]{0.5;}
AO(-0.4cm){p}[label={2p}]{2;}
node at (1cm, -1){C};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(3cm){s}[label={$2mathrm{a}_1$}]{0;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={1e}]{0.9;pair}
AO(3cm){s}{1.1;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$3mathrm{a}_1$}]{2;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$4mathrm{a}_1$}]{3;}
AO(3cm){s}[label={2e}]{3.9;}
AO(3cm){s}{4.1;}
node at (3cm, -1){ce{CH_2}};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(5cm){s}[label={1s}]{2.5;}
node at (5cm, -1){H};
end{MOdiagram}
end{document}
tikz-pgf modiagram
I'm trying to draw an MO diagram for CH2 by mimicking this MO diagram (excluding the orbital images), but things don't look like the way I want it to be. I really want to make it nice and similar to the image, but what I'm doing right now just seems sad and would really appreciate it if someone can help me.

I tried using MOdiagram package, but needs A LOT of work on it, especially with the overall size of the diagram because it is too small when I typeset. So, it would be really nice if someone can help me. Please and thank you.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{modiagram}
usepackage[version=4]{mhchem}
begin{document}
begin{MOdiagram}[labels-fs=scriptsize]
AO(1cm){s}[label={2s}]{0.5;}
AO(-0.4cm){p}[label={2p}]{2;}
node at (1cm, -1){C};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(3cm){s}[label={$2mathrm{a}_1$}]{0;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={1e}]{0.9;pair}
AO(3cm){s}{1.1;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$3mathrm{a}_1$}]{2;pair}
AO(3cm){s}[label={$4mathrm{a}_1$}]{3;}
AO(3cm){s}[label={2e}]{3.9;}
AO(3cm){s}{4.1;}
node at (3cm, -1){ce{CH_2}};
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
AO(5cm){s}[label={1s}]{2.5;}
node at (5cm, -1){H};
end{MOdiagram}
end{document}
tikz-pgf modiagram
tikz-pgf modiagram
edited Mar 3 at 2:57
Dave2343
asked Mar 2 at 23:05
Dave2343Dave2343
785
785
2
Most likelydocumentcalss{article}should bedocumentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.
– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58
add a comment |
2
Most likelydocumentcalss{article}should bedocumentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.
– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58
2
2
Most likely
documentcalss{article} should be documentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
Most likely
documentcalss{article} should be documentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I haven't used MOdiagram before, but as you tagged the question tikz-pgf, here is a (simple) pure TikZ solution.
I am not even using a chemistry package and writing BeH2 as BeH$_2$
:) but you really should change that in your document.
documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[dotted] (-3,0)--(-.3,3)--(.3,3)--(4,-1)--(.3,-4.5)--(-.3,-4.5)--cycle;
draw[dotted] (-3,-1.5)--(-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5)--(4,-2)--(.3,-6.5)--(-.3,-6.5)--cycle;
draw[thick] (-.3,3)--(.3,3) (-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5) (-.8,0)--(-.2,0) (.2,0)--(.8,0) (-.3,-4.5)--(.3,-4.5) (-.3,-6.5)--(.3,-6.5) (-3,0)--(-3.6,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_z$} (-3.8,0)--(-4.4,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_y$} (-4.6,0)--(-5.2,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_x$} (-3,-1.5)--(-3.6,-1.5) node[midway,below] {$2s$} (4,-2)--(4.6,-2) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm g$} (4,-1)--(4.6,-1) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm u$};
draw[dotted] (-4.6,0)--(1.9,0);
draw (0,0) node[below] {$pi_mathrm u^mathrm n$};
draw (0,.75) node {$sigma^*_mathrm g$};
draw (0,2.25) node {$sigma^*_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-5.5) node {$sigma_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-4.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-6.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-7) node {$sigma_mathrm g$};
draw (-4.2,4) node {Be};
draw (0,4) node {BeH$_2$};
draw (4.2,4) node {2 H (textsc{salc}s)};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477492%2fmolecular-orbital-diagram-for-ch2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I haven't used MOdiagram before, but as you tagged the question tikz-pgf, here is a (simple) pure TikZ solution.
I am not even using a chemistry package and writing BeH2 as BeH$_2$
:) but you really should change that in your document.
documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[dotted] (-3,0)--(-.3,3)--(.3,3)--(4,-1)--(.3,-4.5)--(-.3,-4.5)--cycle;
draw[dotted] (-3,-1.5)--(-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5)--(4,-2)--(.3,-6.5)--(-.3,-6.5)--cycle;
draw[thick] (-.3,3)--(.3,3) (-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5) (-.8,0)--(-.2,0) (.2,0)--(.8,0) (-.3,-4.5)--(.3,-4.5) (-.3,-6.5)--(.3,-6.5) (-3,0)--(-3.6,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_z$} (-3.8,0)--(-4.4,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_y$} (-4.6,0)--(-5.2,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_x$} (-3,-1.5)--(-3.6,-1.5) node[midway,below] {$2s$} (4,-2)--(4.6,-2) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm g$} (4,-1)--(4.6,-1) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm u$};
draw[dotted] (-4.6,0)--(1.9,0);
draw (0,0) node[below] {$pi_mathrm u^mathrm n$};
draw (0,.75) node {$sigma^*_mathrm g$};
draw (0,2.25) node {$sigma^*_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-5.5) node {$sigma_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-4.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-6.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-7) node {$sigma_mathrm g$};
draw (-4.2,4) node {Be};
draw (0,4) node {BeH$_2$};
draw (4.2,4) node {2 H (textsc{salc}s)};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
I haven't used MOdiagram before, but as you tagged the question tikz-pgf, here is a (simple) pure TikZ solution.
I am not even using a chemistry package and writing BeH2 as BeH$_2$
:) but you really should change that in your document.
documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[dotted] (-3,0)--(-.3,3)--(.3,3)--(4,-1)--(.3,-4.5)--(-.3,-4.5)--cycle;
draw[dotted] (-3,-1.5)--(-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5)--(4,-2)--(.3,-6.5)--(-.3,-6.5)--cycle;
draw[thick] (-.3,3)--(.3,3) (-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5) (-.8,0)--(-.2,0) (.2,0)--(.8,0) (-.3,-4.5)--(.3,-4.5) (-.3,-6.5)--(.3,-6.5) (-3,0)--(-3.6,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_z$} (-3.8,0)--(-4.4,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_y$} (-4.6,0)--(-5.2,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_x$} (-3,-1.5)--(-3.6,-1.5) node[midway,below] {$2s$} (4,-2)--(4.6,-2) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm g$} (4,-1)--(4.6,-1) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm u$};
draw[dotted] (-4.6,0)--(1.9,0);
draw (0,0) node[below] {$pi_mathrm u^mathrm n$};
draw (0,.75) node {$sigma^*_mathrm g$};
draw (0,2.25) node {$sigma^*_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-5.5) node {$sigma_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-4.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-6.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-7) node {$sigma_mathrm g$};
draw (-4.2,4) node {Be};
draw (0,4) node {BeH$_2$};
draw (4.2,4) node {2 H (textsc{salc}s)};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

add a comment |
I haven't used MOdiagram before, but as you tagged the question tikz-pgf, here is a (simple) pure TikZ solution.
I am not even using a chemistry package and writing BeH2 as BeH$_2$
:) but you really should change that in your document.
documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[dotted] (-3,0)--(-.3,3)--(.3,3)--(4,-1)--(.3,-4.5)--(-.3,-4.5)--cycle;
draw[dotted] (-3,-1.5)--(-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5)--(4,-2)--(.3,-6.5)--(-.3,-6.5)--cycle;
draw[thick] (-.3,3)--(.3,3) (-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5) (-.8,0)--(-.2,0) (.2,0)--(.8,0) (-.3,-4.5)--(.3,-4.5) (-.3,-6.5)--(.3,-6.5) (-3,0)--(-3.6,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_z$} (-3.8,0)--(-4.4,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_y$} (-4.6,0)--(-5.2,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_x$} (-3,-1.5)--(-3.6,-1.5) node[midway,below] {$2s$} (4,-2)--(4.6,-2) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm g$} (4,-1)--(4.6,-1) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm u$};
draw[dotted] (-4.6,0)--(1.9,0);
draw (0,0) node[below] {$pi_mathrm u^mathrm n$};
draw (0,.75) node {$sigma^*_mathrm g$};
draw (0,2.25) node {$sigma^*_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-5.5) node {$sigma_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-4.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-6.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-7) node {$sigma_mathrm g$};
draw (-4.2,4) node {Be};
draw (0,4) node {BeH$_2$};
draw (4.2,4) node {2 H (textsc{salc}s)};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

I haven't used MOdiagram before, but as you tagged the question tikz-pgf, here is a (simple) pure TikZ solution.
I am not even using a chemistry package and writing BeH2 as BeH$_2$
:) but you really should change that in your document.
documentclass[tikz,margin=3mm]{standalone}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw[dotted] (-3,0)--(-.3,3)--(.3,3)--(4,-1)--(.3,-4.5)--(-.3,-4.5)--cycle;
draw[dotted] (-3,-1.5)--(-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5)--(4,-2)--(.3,-6.5)--(-.3,-6.5)--cycle;
draw[thick] (-.3,3)--(.3,3) (-.3,1.5)--(.3,1.5) (-.8,0)--(-.2,0) (.2,0)--(.8,0) (-.3,-4.5)--(.3,-4.5) (-.3,-6.5)--(.3,-6.5) (-3,0)--(-3.6,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_z$} (-3.8,0)--(-4.4,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_y$} (-4.6,0)--(-5.2,0) node[midway,below] {$2p_x$} (-3,-1.5)--(-3.6,-1.5) node[midway,below] {$2s$} (4,-2)--(4.6,-2) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm g$} (4,-1)--(4.6,-1) node[midway,below] {$Phi_mathrm u$};
draw[dotted] (-4.6,0)--(1.9,0);
draw (0,0) node[below] {$pi_mathrm u^mathrm n$};
draw (0,.75) node {$sigma^*_mathrm g$};
draw (0,2.25) node {$sigma^*_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-5.5) node {$sigma_mathrm u$};
draw (0,-4.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-6.5) node {rotatebox{90}{$rightleftharpoons$}};
draw (0,-7) node {$sigma_mathrm g$};
draw (-4.2,4) node {Be};
draw (0,4) node {BeH$_2$};
draw (4.2,4) node {2 H (textsc{salc}s)};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

edited Mar 4 at 15:06
answered Mar 3 at 6:20
JouleVJouleV
5,05111239
5,05111239
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477492%2fmolecular-orbital-diagram-for-ch2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Most likely
documentcalss{article}should bedocumentclass{article}. And if I correct this, I get errors on my machine. Most likely you are not to blame for them but I am wondering which TeX installation you are using.– marmot
Mar 3 at 0:52
@marmot Sorry for that. I tried fixing some details of it. See if the copy and paste works now, when you typeset. Please and thank you.
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:12
Thanks for updating you MWE! Unfortunately I run into the issue tex.stackexchange.com/q/474476/121799 . (Anybody else having the same problem?)
– marmot
Mar 3 at 2:24
Try adding the package usepackage[version=4]{mhchem} It should do the trick. @marmot
– Dave2343
Mar 3 at 2:58