What is the etymology of the kanji 食?












2















In the Wiktionary page for this kanji they said that it's a pictogram for someone's mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand .. the question is: are they meaning this was the actual way for eating in this time without using hands? Or this just a symbol?










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

    – BJCUAI
    Mar 2 at 20:37






  • 1





    Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

    – droooze
    Mar 2 at 23:46


















2















In the Wiktionary page for this kanji they said that it's a pictogram for someone's mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand .. the question is: are they meaning this was the actual way for eating in this time without using hands? Or this just a symbol?










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

    – BJCUAI
    Mar 2 at 20:37






  • 1





    Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

    – droooze
    Mar 2 at 23:46
















2












2








2








In the Wiktionary page for this kanji they said that it's a pictogram for someone's mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand .. the question is: are they meaning this was the actual way for eating in this time without using hands? Or this just a symbol?










share|improve this question
















In the Wiktionary page for this kanji they said that it's a pictogram for someone's mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand .. the question is: are they meaning this was the actual way for eating in this time without using hands? Or this just a symbol?







kanji etymology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 2 at 23:40









droooze

5,62912033




5,62912033










asked Mar 2 at 20:23









user32763user32763

2489




2489








  • 2





    Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

    – BJCUAI
    Mar 2 at 20:37






  • 1





    Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

    – droooze
    Mar 2 at 23:46
















  • 2





    Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

    – BJCUAI
    Mar 2 at 20:37






  • 1





    Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

    – droooze
    Mar 2 at 23:46










2




2





Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

– BJCUAI
Mar 2 at 20:37





Your own source answers this, saying: 'a mouth over a bowl of rice on a stand.' en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E9%A3%9F

– BJCUAI
Mar 2 at 20:37




1




1





Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

– droooze
Mar 2 at 23:46







Pictographic Kanji are simplified or abstract depictions of the word they're supposed to represent. They're not going to include every single detail of the situation... hands do not add anything important to the action to eat.

– droooze
Mar 2 at 23:46












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














「食」(to eat) was originally「𠊊」, comprised of a mouth「亼・亽」and a cereal/grain/wheat basket「皀」. In the character「食」,「皀」was later changed into the shape of「艮」.





enter image description here
甲1289
合集11485
春秋

enter image description here
仲義⿱貝口
集成2279


enter image description here
說文解字
 


enter image description here
睡ㆍ秦78
 


enter image description here

 




「亼・亽」is「口」(mouth) written upside-down. This is more evident in the older shapes of「口」:





enter image description here
珠579
合集27706


enter image description here
睡ㆍ為32
 


enter image description here

 



「亼・亽」functions as a semantic component in characters like 令, 命, 合, 今, among others.







enter image description here
存下764
合集32879


enter image description here
京津4144
合集27937


enter image description here
說文解字
 


enter image description here

 


enter image description here

 



「皀」fell into disuse as an individual character, but the word it represented remained, now written as「簋」, formed by adding「竹」(bamboo) and「皿」(dish; vessel) onto「皀」.





enter image description here
說文解字
 


enter image description here

 



「皀」is a component in characters like 卽 (Shinjitai: 即), 旣 (Shinjitai: 既), 鄕 (Shinjitai: 郷), among others.






References:




  • 季旭昇《說文新證》

  • 小學堂


  • 國學大師


    • 郭沫若《甲骨文合集》

    • 中國社會科學院考古研究所《殷周金文集成》








share|improve this answer

































    2














    Here's the illustration from [学習]{がくしゅう}[漢字]{かんじ}[新辞典]{しんじてん} (a great little elementary-level Kanji dictionary) that shows the origins of 食 as an open mouth pointing straight down, over a bowl filled with rice.



    食の字のなりたち






    share|improve this answer
























    • I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

      – user32763
      Mar 2 at 20:56








    • 1





      The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

      – db2
      Mar 2 at 21:43











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "257"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65804%2fwhat-is-the-etymology-of-the-kanji-%25e9%25a3%259f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    「食」(to eat) was originally「𠊊」, comprised of a mouth「亼・亽」and a cereal/grain/wheat basket「皀」. In the character「食」,「皀」was later changed into the shape of「艮」.





    enter image description here
    甲1289
    合集11485
    春秋

    enter image description here
    仲義⿱貝口
    集成2279


    enter image description here
    說文解字
     


    enter image description here
    睡ㆍ秦78
     


    enter image description here

     




    「亼・亽」is「口」(mouth) written upside-down. This is more evident in the older shapes of「口」:





    enter image description here
    珠579
    合集27706


    enter image description here
    睡ㆍ為32
     


    enter image description here

     



    「亼・亽」functions as a semantic component in characters like 令, 命, 合, 今, among others.







    enter image description here
    存下764
    合集32879


    enter image description here
    京津4144
    合集27937


    enter image description here
    說文解字
     


    enter image description here

     


    enter image description here

     



    「皀」fell into disuse as an individual character, but the word it represented remained, now written as「簋」, formed by adding「竹」(bamboo) and「皿」(dish; vessel) onto「皀」.





    enter image description here
    說文解字
     


    enter image description here

     



    「皀」is a component in characters like 卽 (Shinjitai: 即), 旣 (Shinjitai: 既), 鄕 (Shinjitai: 郷), among others.






    References:




    • 季旭昇《說文新證》

    • 小學堂


    • 國學大師


      • 郭沫若《甲骨文合集》

      • 中國社會科學院考古研究所《殷周金文集成》








    share|improve this answer






























      5














      「食」(to eat) was originally「𠊊」, comprised of a mouth「亼・亽」and a cereal/grain/wheat basket「皀」. In the character「食」,「皀」was later changed into the shape of「艮」.





      enter image description here
      甲1289
      合集11485
      春秋

      enter image description here
      仲義⿱貝口
      集成2279


      enter image description here
      說文解字
       


      enter image description here
      睡ㆍ秦78
       


      enter image description here

       




      「亼・亽」is「口」(mouth) written upside-down. This is more evident in the older shapes of「口」:





      enter image description here
      珠579
      合集27706


      enter image description here
      睡ㆍ為32
       


      enter image description here

       



      「亼・亽」functions as a semantic component in characters like 令, 命, 合, 今, among others.







      enter image description here
      存下764
      合集32879


      enter image description here
      京津4144
      合集27937


      enter image description here
      說文解字
       


      enter image description here

       


      enter image description here

       



      「皀」fell into disuse as an individual character, but the word it represented remained, now written as「簋」, formed by adding「竹」(bamboo) and「皿」(dish; vessel) onto「皀」.





      enter image description here
      說文解字
       


      enter image description here

       



      「皀」is a component in characters like 卽 (Shinjitai: 即), 旣 (Shinjitai: 既), 鄕 (Shinjitai: 郷), among others.






      References:




      • 季旭昇《說文新證》

      • 小學堂


      • 國學大師


        • 郭沫若《甲骨文合集》

        • 中國社會科學院考古研究所《殷周金文集成》








      share|improve this answer




























        5












        5








        5







        「食」(to eat) was originally「𠊊」, comprised of a mouth「亼・亽」and a cereal/grain/wheat basket「皀」. In the character「食」,「皀」was later changed into the shape of「艮」.





        enter image description here
        甲1289
        合集11485
        春秋

        enter image description here
        仲義⿱貝口
        集成2279


        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here
        睡ㆍ秦78
         


        enter image description here

         




        「亼・亽」is「口」(mouth) written upside-down. This is more evident in the older shapes of「口」:





        enter image description here
        珠579
        合集27706


        enter image description here
        睡ㆍ為32
         


        enter image description here

         



        「亼・亽」functions as a semantic component in characters like 令, 命, 合, 今, among others.







        enter image description here
        存下764
        合集32879


        enter image description here
        京津4144
        合集27937


        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here

         


        enter image description here

         



        「皀」fell into disuse as an individual character, but the word it represented remained, now written as「簋」, formed by adding「竹」(bamboo) and「皿」(dish; vessel) onto「皀」.





        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here

         



        「皀」is a component in characters like 卽 (Shinjitai: 即), 旣 (Shinjitai: 既), 鄕 (Shinjitai: 郷), among others.






        References:




        • 季旭昇《說文新證》

        • 小學堂


        • 國學大師


          • 郭沫若《甲骨文合集》

          • 中國社會科學院考古研究所《殷周金文集成》








        share|improve this answer















        「食」(to eat) was originally「𠊊」, comprised of a mouth「亼・亽」and a cereal/grain/wheat basket「皀」. In the character「食」,「皀」was later changed into the shape of「艮」.





        enter image description here
        甲1289
        合集11485
        春秋

        enter image description here
        仲義⿱貝口
        集成2279


        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here
        睡ㆍ秦78
         


        enter image description here

         




        「亼・亽」is「口」(mouth) written upside-down. This is more evident in the older shapes of「口」:





        enter image description here
        珠579
        合集27706


        enter image description here
        睡ㆍ為32
         


        enter image description here

         



        「亼・亽」functions as a semantic component in characters like 令, 命, 合, 今, among others.







        enter image description here
        存下764
        合集32879


        enter image description here
        京津4144
        合集27937


        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here

         


        enter image description here

         



        「皀」fell into disuse as an individual character, but the word it represented remained, now written as「簋」, formed by adding「竹」(bamboo) and「皿」(dish; vessel) onto「皀」.





        enter image description here
        說文解字
         


        enter image description here

         



        「皀」is a component in characters like 卽 (Shinjitai: 即), 旣 (Shinjitai: 既), 鄕 (Shinjitai: 郷), among others.






        References:




        • 季旭昇《說文新證》

        • 小學堂


        • 國學大師


          • 郭沫若《甲骨文合集》

          • 中國社會科學院考古研究所《殷周金文集成》









        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 2 at 23:47

























        answered Mar 2 at 23:39









        drooozedroooze

        5,62912033




        5,62912033























            2














            Here's the illustration from [学習]{がくしゅう}[漢字]{かんじ}[新辞典]{しんじてん} (a great little elementary-level Kanji dictionary) that shows the origins of 食 as an open mouth pointing straight down, over a bowl filled with rice.



            食の字のなりたち






            share|improve this answer
























            • I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

              – user32763
              Mar 2 at 20:56








            • 1





              The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

              – db2
              Mar 2 at 21:43
















            2














            Here's the illustration from [学習]{がくしゅう}[漢字]{かんじ}[新辞典]{しんじてん} (a great little elementary-level Kanji dictionary) that shows the origins of 食 as an open mouth pointing straight down, over a bowl filled with rice.



            食の字のなりたち






            share|improve this answer
























            • I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

              – user32763
              Mar 2 at 20:56








            • 1





              The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

              – db2
              Mar 2 at 21:43














            2












            2








            2







            Here's the illustration from [学習]{がくしゅう}[漢字]{かんじ}[新辞典]{しんじてん} (a great little elementary-level Kanji dictionary) that shows the origins of 食 as an open mouth pointing straight down, over a bowl filled with rice.



            食の字のなりたち






            share|improve this answer













            Here's the illustration from [学習]{がくしゅう}[漢字]{かんじ}[新辞典]{しんじてん} (a great little elementary-level Kanji dictionary) that shows the origins of 食 as an open mouth pointing straight down, over a bowl filled with rice.



            食の字のなりたち







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 2 at 20:53









            db2db2

            1485




            1485













            • I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

              – user32763
              Mar 2 at 20:56








            • 1





              The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

              – db2
              Mar 2 at 21:43



















            • I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

              – user32763
              Mar 2 at 20:56








            • 1





              The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

              – db2
              Mar 2 at 21:43

















            I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

            – user32763
            Mar 2 at 20:56







            I know this bro but I want to know if this mouth just a sympol or this was the actuall way of eating with mouth without hands ? .. and thanks for the answer

            – user32763
            Mar 2 at 20:56






            1




            1





            The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

            – db2
            Mar 2 at 21:43





            The dates I'm seeing suggest that chopsticks were invented a few hundred years before the earliest Chinese writing system, so it seems unlikely (though not impossible) that they were actually eating by just slamming their face down on the rice bowl. :)

            – db2
            Mar 2 at 21:43


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f65804%2fwhat-is-the-etymology-of-the-kanji-%25e9%25a3%259f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents