1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1












3












$begingroup$


Start with the digits:



      $1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1$



You may then add (only!) these simple arithmetic operators:



      $+ - times div$



You may also remove the space between no more than 3 adjacent digits, to make larger numbers:



      $1 0 1$ can be concatenated to $101$, for example

      $1 0 1 0 1$ cannot be concatenated to $require{enclose}enclose{horizontalstrike}{10101} $ (too many digits)



You must then insert one equal sign $ = $ between two numbers to form a valid and correct equation.



What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation?



[Added bonus question]
What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation if operators only appear on one side of the equal sign?





Unary negation $-1$ is allowed.

Unary plus $+1$ is not allowed.

Binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are allowed.

No other operators are allowed.

No decimal points, and no rounding.

Leading zeroes on numbers are not allowed.

Base 10 only.



Order of operations:

What Perl uses. Basically, BO(DM)(AS):

  • left to right

  • multiplication and division done together in one pass

  • addition and subtraction done together in a lower priority pass
You may add parentheses if required to reorder evaluation. Each pair counts as an operator.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Yes to all the above.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Mar 3 at 0:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's an interesting title you got there.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Mar 3 at 8:45
















3












$begingroup$


Start with the digits:



      $1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1$



You may then add (only!) these simple arithmetic operators:



      $+ - times div$



You may also remove the space between no more than 3 adjacent digits, to make larger numbers:



      $1 0 1$ can be concatenated to $101$, for example

      $1 0 1 0 1$ cannot be concatenated to $require{enclose}enclose{horizontalstrike}{10101} $ (too many digits)



You must then insert one equal sign $ = $ between two numbers to form a valid and correct equation.



What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation?



[Added bonus question]
What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation if operators only appear on one side of the equal sign?





Unary negation $-1$ is allowed.

Unary plus $+1$ is not allowed.

Binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are allowed.

No other operators are allowed.

No decimal points, and no rounding.

Leading zeroes on numbers are not allowed.

Base 10 only.



Order of operations:

What Perl uses. Basically, BO(DM)(AS):

  • left to right

  • multiplication and division done together in one pass

  • addition and subtraction done together in a lower priority pass
You may add parentheses if required to reorder evaluation. Each pair counts as an operator.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Yes to all the above.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Mar 3 at 0:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's an interesting title you got there.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Mar 3 at 8:45














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Start with the digits:



      $1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1$



You may then add (only!) these simple arithmetic operators:



      $+ - times div$



You may also remove the space between no more than 3 adjacent digits, to make larger numbers:



      $1 0 1$ can be concatenated to $101$, for example

      $1 0 1 0 1$ cannot be concatenated to $require{enclose}enclose{horizontalstrike}{10101} $ (too many digits)



You must then insert one equal sign $ = $ between two numbers to form a valid and correct equation.



What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation?



[Added bonus question]
What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation if operators only appear on one side of the equal sign?





Unary negation $-1$ is allowed.

Unary plus $+1$ is not allowed.

Binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are allowed.

No other operators are allowed.

No decimal points, and no rounding.

Leading zeroes on numbers are not allowed.

Base 10 only.



Order of operations:

What Perl uses. Basically, BO(DM)(AS):

  • left to right

  • multiplication and division done together in one pass

  • addition and subtraction done together in a lower priority pass
You may add parentheses if required to reorder evaluation. Each pair counts as an operator.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Start with the digits:



      $1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1$



You may then add (only!) these simple arithmetic operators:



      $+ - times div$



You may also remove the space between no more than 3 adjacent digits, to make larger numbers:



      $1 0 1$ can be concatenated to $101$, for example

      $1 0 1 0 1$ cannot be concatenated to $require{enclose}enclose{horizontalstrike}{10101} $ (too many digits)



You must then insert one equal sign $ = $ between two numbers to form a valid and correct equation.



What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation?



[Added bonus question]
What is the fewest operators you can add to form a valid equation if operators only appear on one side of the equal sign?





Unary negation $-1$ is allowed.

Unary plus $+1$ is not allowed.

Binary addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division are allowed.

No other operators are allowed.

No decimal points, and no rounding.

Leading zeroes on numbers are not allowed.

Base 10 only.



Order of operations:

What Perl uses. Basically, BO(DM)(AS):

  • left to right

  • multiplication and division done together in one pass

  • addition and subtraction done together in a lower priority pass
You may add parentheses if required to reorder evaluation. Each pair counts as an operator.







no-computers formation-of-numbers arithmetic






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 3 at 0:25







Rubio

















asked Mar 2 at 23:50









RubioRubio

29.4k566180




29.4k566180












  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Yes to all the above.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Mar 3 at 0:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's an interesting title you got there.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Mar 3 at 8:45


















  • $begingroup$
    Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:04










  • $begingroup$
    Yes to all the above.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Mar 3 at 0:14










  • $begingroup$
    That's an interesting title you got there.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Mar 3 at 8:45
















$begingroup$
Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
Mar 3 at 0:01




$begingroup$
Just to be clear: (1) you're allowed any number of arithmetic operators, not just one of each?, (2) you can do any number of space-removals, just not so as to make any single number longer than 3 digits?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
Mar 3 at 0:01












$begingroup$
Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
Mar 3 at 0:04




$begingroup$
Further clarification: (3) the number 0 is allowed despite the "no leading zeroes" rule?
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan
Mar 3 at 0:04












$begingroup$
Yes to all the above.
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Mar 3 at 0:14




$begingroup$
Yes to all the above.
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Mar 3 at 0:14












$begingroup$
That's an interesting title you got there.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Mar 3 at 8:45




$begingroup$
That's an interesting title you got there.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Mar 3 at 8:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Here is a simple, but optimal, solution.




10+101+0=10+101




uses a total of




three additions, one =, and no other operators.




The best one could hope for is




two operators (and one =) -- since no number can be longer than 3 digits, we have to break up the string of digits in at least three places. So the above can't be improved much.




And in fact,




we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    Mar 3 at 0:07












  • $begingroup$
    I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:09





















4












$begingroup$

To answer the bonus question, you'll need:




$10-10+101+0=101$




This is optimal for the reason given in Gareth's answer by himself:




we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.




Of course, the main solution has already been given.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80169%2f1-0-1-0-1-0-1-0-1-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Here is a simple, but optimal, solution.




    10+101+0=10+101




    uses a total of




    three additions, one =, and no other operators.




    The best one could hope for is




    two operators (and one =) -- since no number can be longer than 3 digits, we have to break up the string of digits in at least three places. So the above can't be improved much.




    And in fact,




    we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
      $endgroup$
      – EKons
      Mar 3 at 0:07












    • $begingroup$
      I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      Mar 3 at 0:09


















    6












    $begingroup$

    Here is a simple, but optimal, solution.




    10+101+0=10+101




    uses a total of




    three additions, one =, and no other operators.




    The best one could hope for is




    two operators (and one =) -- since no number can be longer than 3 digits, we have to break up the string of digits in at least three places. So the above can't be improved much.




    And in fact,




    we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
      $endgroup$
      – EKons
      Mar 3 at 0:07












    • $begingroup$
      I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      Mar 3 at 0:09
















    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Here is a simple, but optimal, solution.




    10+101+0=10+101




    uses a total of




    three additions, one =, and no other operators.




    The best one could hope for is




    two operators (and one =) -- since no number can be longer than 3 digits, we have to break up the string of digits in at least three places. So the above can't be improved much.




    And in fact,




    we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here is a simple, but optimal, solution.




    10+101+0=10+101




    uses a total of




    three additions, one =, and no other operators.




    The best one could hope for is




    two operators (and one =) -- since no number can be longer than 3 digits, we have to break up the string of digits in at least three places. So the above can't be improved much.




    And in fact,




    we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 3 at 0:12

























    answered Mar 3 at 0:03









    Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

    64.3k3163252




    64.3k3163252












    • $begingroup$
      "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
      $endgroup$
      – EKons
      Mar 3 at 0:07












    • $begingroup$
      I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      Mar 3 at 0:09




















    • $begingroup$
      "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
      $endgroup$
      – EKons
      Mar 3 at 0:07












    • $begingroup$
      I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
      $endgroup$
      – Gareth McCaughan
      Mar 3 at 0:09


















    $begingroup$
    "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    Mar 3 at 0:07






    $begingroup$
    "The best one could hope for is" exactly what I'm thinking about right now. ;-) The solution you've provided (and its trivial variants) is the easy one.
    $endgroup$
    – EKons
    Mar 3 at 0:07














    $begingroup$
    I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:09






    $begingroup$
    I actually think it's impossible to do better than the easy one, but I haven't checked my reasoning yet or even written it down explicitly... [EDITED to add:] Yup, seems to be correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Mar 3 at 0:09













    4












    $begingroup$

    To answer the bonus question, you'll need:




    $10-10+101+0=101$




    This is optimal for the reason given in Gareth's answer by himself:




    we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.




    Of course, the main solution has already been given.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      To answer the bonus question, you'll need:




      $10-10+101+0=101$




      This is optimal for the reason given in Gareth's answer by himself:




      we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.




      Of course, the main solution has already been given.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        To answer the bonus question, you'll need:




        $10-10+101+0=101$




        This is optimal for the reason given in Gareth's answer by himself:




        we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.




        Of course, the main solution has already been given.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        To answer the bonus question, you'll need:




        $10-10+101+0=101$




        This is optimal for the reason given in Gareth's answer by himself:




        we have to break in at least four places, so the above is optimal. Why? Because if we ever break after a 1 then the next number starts with a 0 and hence must be exactly a 0; if there is a single-digit number then the remaining 10 digits must still form >3 groups (because no group is longer than 3), so we get at least 5 groups in all, hence at least 4 group-breakers, hence at least 3 operators. On the other hand, if we never break after a 1 then all our groups other than perhaps the last one are of even size, hence of size at most 2, which again means at least 5 groups in all.




        Of course, the main solution has already been given.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 3 at 0:42









        EKonsEKons

        1,045826




        1,045826






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80169%2f1-0-1-0-1-0-1-0-1-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents