How should I approach using two 8s and two 3s to make the number 24?
$begingroup$
Use two $8$s, two $3$s, and basic arithmetic operators ($ +, -, times , div$, parentheses) to make the number $24$.
(You may not join numbers together to form new numbers, like $ 8, 3rightarrow 83$)
I don't know how to start besides just trying to find the correct answer. Is there a way you can make this equation through small steps or I should just bruteforce it?
mathematics formation-of-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use two $8$s, two $3$s, and basic arithmetic operators ($ +, -, times , div$, parentheses) to make the number $24$.
(You may not join numbers together to form new numbers, like $ 8, 3rightarrow 83$)
I don't know how to start besides just trying to find the correct answer. Is there a way you can make this equation through small steps or I should just bruteforce it?
mathematics formation-of-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
9
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with ifno, and opens up more options ifyes.
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use two $8$s, two $3$s, and basic arithmetic operators ($ +, -, times , div$, parentheses) to make the number $24$.
(You may not join numbers together to form new numbers, like $ 8, 3rightarrow 83$)
I don't know how to start besides just trying to find the correct answer. Is there a way you can make this equation through small steps or I should just bruteforce it?
mathematics formation-of-numbers
$endgroup$
Use two $8$s, two $3$s, and basic arithmetic operators ($ +, -, times , div$, parentheses) to make the number $24$.
(You may not join numbers together to form new numbers, like $ 8, 3rightarrow 83$)
I don't know how to start besides just trying to find the correct answer. Is there a way you can make this equation through small steps or I should just bruteforce it?
mathematics formation-of-numbers
mathematics formation-of-numbers
edited Feb 28 at 14:32
Omega Krypton
4,6882441
4,6882441
asked Feb 27 at 18:44
user9888273user9888273
563
563
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
9
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with ifno, and opens up more options ifyes.
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
9
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with ifno, and opens up more options ifyes.
$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
9
9
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with if
no, and opens up more options if yes.$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with if
no, and opens up more options if yes.$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
While there are some good answers here, it seems like you are asking how to think of the answer. (If so, perhaps the title of this might need to be edited.)
Here's one method of thinking to get to the answer:
1) Is this a trick question?
It appears not - everything seems to be at face value, and there is a mathematics tag not a lateral thinking tag or similar.
2) What do we need to do?
What is the structure of the answer that you need to find? Well, it looks something like $8 + 8 - (3 + 3) = 10$. Except of course, this example equals 10, we need 24. But at least that's what we are going for. Another example is $8 + 8 - (3 times 3) = 7$, but that doesn't work either. Not to worry just yet, we are just getting a feel of things.
3) Can we simplify the problem down at all?
Well, in this case, we can see that we can generate more potential solutions by changing the operators that we use. In fact, that's what we did above - we changed the $+$ in the brackets to $times$, which changed the $6$ in the brackets to a $9$, which subtracted an extra $3$ from the result. The $8 + 8 = 16$ didn't change at all. Hmmm... there's something in that which we can use.
4) What components get us closer to the solution?
So the $16$ we had in both the proposals above is like its own starting point - that is, we can swap the two 8s from the original question for a 16, and make the question "Given a 16 and two 3s, make 24". That's not to say that we are going to find a solution to this, but it's one possible statement that will solve the original question. And it comes from us thinking about the number $16$. What other numbers can we make by consuming two of the numbers?
$1 = 8 div 8$ with $3,3$ leftover
$16 = 8 + 8$ with $3,3$ leftover- $64 = 8 times 8$
- $0 = 8 - 8$
$24 = 8 times 3$ with $8,3$ leftover- $11 = 8 + 3$
- $5 = 8 - 3$
- $2 frac{2}{3} = 8 div 3$
- ...
5) Work from the other end - what do the components of the solution look like?
Consider the solution: $ ? = 24$. What could those components possibly look like? Well, we know that $8 * 3 = 24$ - that's a good start, and can lead us to a potential solution:
$sqrt{8 * 8 * 3 * 3} = 8 * 3 = 24$
I'm not completely happy with this though - it seems to me that using the square root is a bit of trickery. How else can we make 24 using one of our numbers?
- $8 * 3 = 24$
- $8 / frac{1}{3} = 24$
- $27 - 3 = 24$
- $21 + 3 = 24$
- $32 - 8 = 24$
- ...
6) Connect the dots.
We now have a list of numbers that can be made with two of our numbers, and a list of numbers that we want to be made with 3 of our numbers. It might take a bit of inspiration, but is there any link we can make between any of them?
From the above, here's the link I've come up with:
$ 3 - 2 frac{2}{3} = frac{1}{3}$
That will lead us to a solution by putting it all together:
$8 div (3 - frac{8}{3})) = 24$
Fin
That's the way I think of these things. Hopefully you will get to a point where most of this occurs in your head pretty fast, and not necessarily in that order.
$endgroup$
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution that uses only "elementary" operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).
$8 div (3 - (8 div 3))$ (or alternatively $frac{8}{3 - frac{8}{3}}$)
$= 8 div frac{1}{3}$
$= 24$
If we allow square roots, a simpler solution is possible.
$sqrt{8 times 8 times 3 times 3}$
$= 8 times 3$
$= 24$
In fact, there are many more solutions if you allow more operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80039%2fhow-should-i-approach-using-two-8s-and-two-3s-to-make-the-number-24%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
While there are some good answers here, it seems like you are asking how to think of the answer. (If so, perhaps the title of this might need to be edited.)
Here's one method of thinking to get to the answer:
1) Is this a trick question?
It appears not - everything seems to be at face value, and there is a mathematics tag not a lateral thinking tag or similar.
2) What do we need to do?
What is the structure of the answer that you need to find? Well, it looks something like $8 + 8 - (3 + 3) = 10$. Except of course, this example equals 10, we need 24. But at least that's what we are going for. Another example is $8 + 8 - (3 times 3) = 7$, but that doesn't work either. Not to worry just yet, we are just getting a feel of things.
3) Can we simplify the problem down at all?
Well, in this case, we can see that we can generate more potential solutions by changing the operators that we use. In fact, that's what we did above - we changed the $+$ in the brackets to $times$, which changed the $6$ in the brackets to a $9$, which subtracted an extra $3$ from the result. The $8 + 8 = 16$ didn't change at all. Hmmm... there's something in that which we can use.
4) What components get us closer to the solution?
So the $16$ we had in both the proposals above is like its own starting point - that is, we can swap the two 8s from the original question for a 16, and make the question "Given a 16 and two 3s, make 24". That's not to say that we are going to find a solution to this, but it's one possible statement that will solve the original question. And it comes from us thinking about the number $16$. What other numbers can we make by consuming two of the numbers?
$1 = 8 div 8$ with $3,3$ leftover
$16 = 8 + 8$ with $3,3$ leftover- $64 = 8 times 8$
- $0 = 8 - 8$
$24 = 8 times 3$ with $8,3$ leftover- $11 = 8 + 3$
- $5 = 8 - 3$
- $2 frac{2}{3} = 8 div 3$
- ...
5) Work from the other end - what do the components of the solution look like?
Consider the solution: $ ? = 24$. What could those components possibly look like? Well, we know that $8 * 3 = 24$ - that's a good start, and can lead us to a potential solution:
$sqrt{8 * 8 * 3 * 3} = 8 * 3 = 24$
I'm not completely happy with this though - it seems to me that using the square root is a bit of trickery. How else can we make 24 using one of our numbers?
- $8 * 3 = 24$
- $8 / frac{1}{3} = 24$
- $27 - 3 = 24$
- $21 + 3 = 24$
- $32 - 8 = 24$
- ...
6) Connect the dots.
We now have a list of numbers that can be made with two of our numbers, and a list of numbers that we want to be made with 3 of our numbers. It might take a bit of inspiration, but is there any link we can make between any of them?
From the above, here's the link I've come up with:
$ 3 - 2 frac{2}{3} = frac{1}{3}$
That will lead us to a solution by putting it all together:
$8 div (3 - frac{8}{3})) = 24$
Fin
That's the way I think of these things. Hopefully you will get to a point where most of this occurs in your head pretty fast, and not necessarily in that order.
$endgroup$
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While there are some good answers here, it seems like you are asking how to think of the answer. (If so, perhaps the title of this might need to be edited.)
Here's one method of thinking to get to the answer:
1) Is this a trick question?
It appears not - everything seems to be at face value, and there is a mathematics tag not a lateral thinking tag or similar.
2) What do we need to do?
What is the structure of the answer that you need to find? Well, it looks something like $8 + 8 - (3 + 3) = 10$. Except of course, this example equals 10, we need 24. But at least that's what we are going for. Another example is $8 + 8 - (3 times 3) = 7$, but that doesn't work either. Not to worry just yet, we are just getting a feel of things.
3) Can we simplify the problem down at all?
Well, in this case, we can see that we can generate more potential solutions by changing the operators that we use. In fact, that's what we did above - we changed the $+$ in the brackets to $times$, which changed the $6$ in the brackets to a $9$, which subtracted an extra $3$ from the result. The $8 + 8 = 16$ didn't change at all. Hmmm... there's something in that which we can use.
4) What components get us closer to the solution?
So the $16$ we had in both the proposals above is like its own starting point - that is, we can swap the two 8s from the original question for a 16, and make the question "Given a 16 and two 3s, make 24". That's not to say that we are going to find a solution to this, but it's one possible statement that will solve the original question. And it comes from us thinking about the number $16$. What other numbers can we make by consuming two of the numbers?
$1 = 8 div 8$ with $3,3$ leftover
$16 = 8 + 8$ with $3,3$ leftover- $64 = 8 times 8$
- $0 = 8 - 8$
$24 = 8 times 3$ with $8,3$ leftover- $11 = 8 + 3$
- $5 = 8 - 3$
- $2 frac{2}{3} = 8 div 3$
- ...
5) Work from the other end - what do the components of the solution look like?
Consider the solution: $ ? = 24$. What could those components possibly look like? Well, we know that $8 * 3 = 24$ - that's a good start, and can lead us to a potential solution:
$sqrt{8 * 8 * 3 * 3} = 8 * 3 = 24$
I'm not completely happy with this though - it seems to me that using the square root is a bit of trickery. How else can we make 24 using one of our numbers?
- $8 * 3 = 24$
- $8 / frac{1}{3} = 24$
- $27 - 3 = 24$
- $21 + 3 = 24$
- $32 - 8 = 24$
- ...
6) Connect the dots.
We now have a list of numbers that can be made with two of our numbers, and a list of numbers that we want to be made with 3 of our numbers. It might take a bit of inspiration, but is there any link we can make between any of them?
From the above, here's the link I've come up with:
$ 3 - 2 frac{2}{3} = frac{1}{3}$
That will lead us to a solution by putting it all together:
$8 div (3 - frac{8}{3})) = 24$
Fin
That's the way I think of these things. Hopefully you will get to a point where most of this occurs in your head pretty fast, and not necessarily in that order.
$endgroup$
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While there are some good answers here, it seems like you are asking how to think of the answer. (If so, perhaps the title of this might need to be edited.)
Here's one method of thinking to get to the answer:
1) Is this a trick question?
It appears not - everything seems to be at face value, and there is a mathematics tag not a lateral thinking tag or similar.
2) What do we need to do?
What is the structure of the answer that you need to find? Well, it looks something like $8 + 8 - (3 + 3) = 10$. Except of course, this example equals 10, we need 24. But at least that's what we are going for. Another example is $8 + 8 - (3 times 3) = 7$, but that doesn't work either. Not to worry just yet, we are just getting a feel of things.
3) Can we simplify the problem down at all?
Well, in this case, we can see that we can generate more potential solutions by changing the operators that we use. In fact, that's what we did above - we changed the $+$ in the brackets to $times$, which changed the $6$ in the brackets to a $9$, which subtracted an extra $3$ from the result. The $8 + 8 = 16$ didn't change at all. Hmmm... there's something in that which we can use.
4) What components get us closer to the solution?
So the $16$ we had in both the proposals above is like its own starting point - that is, we can swap the two 8s from the original question for a 16, and make the question "Given a 16 and two 3s, make 24". That's not to say that we are going to find a solution to this, but it's one possible statement that will solve the original question. And it comes from us thinking about the number $16$. What other numbers can we make by consuming two of the numbers?
$1 = 8 div 8$ with $3,3$ leftover
$16 = 8 + 8$ with $3,3$ leftover- $64 = 8 times 8$
- $0 = 8 - 8$
$24 = 8 times 3$ with $8,3$ leftover- $11 = 8 + 3$
- $5 = 8 - 3$
- $2 frac{2}{3} = 8 div 3$
- ...
5) Work from the other end - what do the components of the solution look like?
Consider the solution: $ ? = 24$. What could those components possibly look like? Well, we know that $8 * 3 = 24$ - that's a good start, and can lead us to a potential solution:
$sqrt{8 * 8 * 3 * 3} = 8 * 3 = 24$
I'm not completely happy with this though - it seems to me that using the square root is a bit of trickery. How else can we make 24 using one of our numbers?
- $8 * 3 = 24$
- $8 / frac{1}{3} = 24$
- $27 - 3 = 24$
- $21 + 3 = 24$
- $32 - 8 = 24$
- ...
6) Connect the dots.
We now have a list of numbers that can be made with two of our numbers, and a list of numbers that we want to be made with 3 of our numbers. It might take a bit of inspiration, but is there any link we can make between any of them?
From the above, here's the link I've come up with:
$ 3 - 2 frac{2}{3} = frac{1}{3}$
That will lead us to a solution by putting it all together:
$8 div (3 - frac{8}{3})) = 24$
Fin
That's the way I think of these things. Hopefully you will get to a point where most of this occurs in your head pretty fast, and not necessarily in that order.
$endgroup$
While there are some good answers here, it seems like you are asking how to think of the answer. (If so, perhaps the title of this might need to be edited.)
Here's one method of thinking to get to the answer:
1) Is this a trick question?
It appears not - everything seems to be at face value, and there is a mathematics tag not a lateral thinking tag or similar.
2) What do we need to do?
What is the structure of the answer that you need to find? Well, it looks something like $8 + 8 - (3 + 3) = 10$. Except of course, this example equals 10, we need 24. But at least that's what we are going for. Another example is $8 + 8 - (3 times 3) = 7$, but that doesn't work either. Not to worry just yet, we are just getting a feel of things.
3) Can we simplify the problem down at all?
Well, in this case, we can see that we can generate more potential solutions by changing the operators that we use. In fact, that's what we did above - we changed the $+$ in the brackets to $times$, which changed the $6$ in the brackets to a $9$, which subtracted an extra $3$ from the result. The $8 + 8 = 16$ didn't change at all. Hmmm... there's something in that which we can use.
4) What components get us closer to the solution?
So the $16$ we had in both the proposals above is like its own starting point - that is, we can swap the two 8s from the original question for a 16, and make the question "Given a 16 and two 3s, make 24". That's not to say that we are going to find a solution to this, but it's one possible statement that will solve the original question. And it comes from us thinking about the number $16$. What other numbers can we make by consuming two of the numbers?
$1 = 8 div 8$ with $3,3$ leftover
$16 = 8 + 8$ with $3,3$ leftover- $64 = 8 times 8$
- $0 = 8 - 8$
$24 = 8 times 3$ with $8,3$ leftover- $11 = 8 + 3$
- $5 = 8 - 3$
- $2 frac{2}{3} = 8 div 3$
- ...
5) Work from the other end - what do the components of the solution look like?
Consider the solution: $ ? = 24$. What could those components possibly look like? Well, we know that $8 * 3 = 24$ - that's a good start, and can lead us to a potential solution:
$sqrt{8 * 8 * 3 * 3} = 8 * 3 = 24$
I'm not completely happy with this though - it seems to me that using the square root is a bit of trickery. How else can we make 24 using one of our numbers?
- $8 * 3 = 24$
- $8 / frac{1}{3} = 24$
- $27 - 3 = 24$
- $21 + 3 = 24$
- $32 - 8 = 24$
- ...
6) Connect the dots.
We now have a list of numbers that can be made with two of our numbers, and a list of numbers that we want to be made with 3 of our numbers. It might take a bit of inspiration, but is there any link we can make between any of them?
From the above, here's the link I've come up with:
$ 3 - 2 frac{2}{3} = frac{1}{3}$
That will lead us to a solution by putting it all together:
$8 div (3 - frac{8}{3})) = 24$
Fin
That's the way I think of these things. Hopefully you will get to a point where most of this occurs in your head pretty fast, and not necessarily in that order.
edited Feb 28 at 6:03
boboquack
15.6k149118
15.6k149118
answered Feb 28 at 4:15
eedraheedrah
885218
885218
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
add a comment |
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
17
17
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
$begingroup$
Hey look, someone actually answered the question asked! :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Feb 28 at 4:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution that uses only "elementary" operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).
$8 div (3 - (8 div 3))$ (or alternatively $frac{8}{3 - frac{8}{3}}$)
$= 8 div frac{1}{3}$
$= 24$
If we allow square roots, a simpler solution is possible.
$sqrt{8 times 8 times 3 times 3}$
$= 8 times 3$
$= 24$
In fact, there are many more solutions if you allow more operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution that uses only "elementary" operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).
$8 div (3 - (8 div 3))$ (or alternatively $frac{8}{3 - frac{8}{3}}$)
$= 8 div frac{1}{3}$
$= 24$
If we allow square roots, a simpler solution is possible.
$sqrt{8 times 8 times 3 times 3}$
$= 8 times 3$
$= 24$
In fact, there are many more solutions if you allow more operations.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution that uses only "elementary" operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).
$8 div (3 - (8 div 3))$ (or alternatively $frac{8}{3 - frac{8}{3}}$)
$= 8 div frac{1}{3}$
$= 24$
If we allow square roots, a simpler solution is possible.
$sqrt{8 times 8 times 3 times 3}$
$= 8 times 3$
$= 24$
In fact, there are many more solutions if you allow more operations.
$endgroup$
Here is a solution that uses only "elementary" operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division).
$8 div (3 - (8 div 3))$ (or alternatively $frac{8}{3 - frac{8}{3}}$)
$= 8 div frac{1}{3}$
$= 24$
If we allow square roots, a simpler solution is possible.
$sqrt{8 times 8 times 3 times 3}$
$= 8 times 3$
$= 24$
In fact, there are many more solutions if you allow more operations.
edited Feb 27 at 18:58
answered Feb 27 at 18:49
HughHugh
2,26811127
2,26811127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80039%2fhow-should-i-approach-using-two-8s-and-two-3s-to-make-the-number-24%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
see puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/50259/coppers-make-24 (GM's answer)
$endgroup$
– JonMark Perry
Feb 27 at 21:17
9
$begingroup$
If I am not mistaken, this question is not asking people to solve the puzzle in question, but is instead asking strategies for how to go about solving it beyond just trying things at random.
$endgroup$
– Lunin
Feb 28 at 1:13
$begingroup$
One thing I'd suggest is determining whether any rounding is allowed. Narrows down the number of pieces you have to work with if
no, and opens up more options ifyes.$endgroup$
– Justin Time
Feb 28 at 1:38