Finding a scalar field whose gradient is a given conservative vector field
$begingroup$
I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.
The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:
$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$
$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$
This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.
Any clarification would be much appreciated!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.
The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:
$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$
$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$
This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.
Any clarification would be much appreciated!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.
The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:
$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$
$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$
This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.
Any clarification would be much appreciated!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields
$endgroup$
I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.
The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:
$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$
$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$
This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.
Any clarification would be much appreciated!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields
calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields
asked Jun 25 '14 at 21:15
James MachinJames Machin
610616
610616
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}
Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f847607%2ffinding-a-scalar-field-whose-gradient-is-a-given-conservative-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.
$endgroup$
The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.
answered Jun 25 '14 at 22:28
Mark FischlerMark Fischler
33.8k12552
33.8k12552
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
$endgroup$
– James Machin
Jun 27 '14 at 0:21
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
$begingroup$
This is a bad answer.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}
Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}
Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}
Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.
$endgroup$
$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}
Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.
answered May 12 '18 at 17:04
Felix MarinFelix Marin
68.8k7109146
68.8k7109146
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
$begingroup$
-this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
$endgroup$
– splitcomplexes
Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$
$endgroup$
What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$
edited Nov 2 '18 at 9:05
answered Nov 2 '18 at 8:58
splitcomplexessplitcomplexes
864
864
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f847607%2ffinding-a-scalar-field-whose-gradient-is-a-given-conservative-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21
$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05
$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46
$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44