Finding a scalar field whose gradient is a given conservative vector field












1












$begingroup$


I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.



The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:



$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$



$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$



This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.



Any clarification would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – rajb245
    Jun 25 '14 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Jan 9 '17 at 5:05












  • $begingroup$
    The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    $vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    May 12 '18 at 16:44
















1












$begingroup$


I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.



The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:



$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$



$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$



This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.



Any clarification would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – rajb245
    Jun 25 '14 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Jan 9 '17 at 5:05












  • $begingroup$
    The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    $vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    May 12 '18 at 16:44














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.



The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:



$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$



$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$



This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.



Any clarification would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm studying for a course in electromagnetism, and I've been given an electric field for which I need to find the associated scalar potential. I was going to originally post this in the physics section but I think my problems are more calculus related. The field is the field generated by a sphere of radius $R$ with constant charge density $rho$ throughout its volume, so that the total charge $Q=dfrac{4pi r^3 rho}{3}$contained in the sphere is constant.



The electric field is given by $vec{E}_{text{in}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r$ and $vec{E}_{text{out}}(vec{r})=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r^2}$, where the former is valid for $rleq R$ and the latter for $rgeq R$. This I've calculated before and I do not have trouble with. The scalar potential $phi(vec{r})$ is defined by $vec{E}=-vec{nabla}phi$. The provided solutions to the problem are hand written but I'll type them here using the exact same notation:



$phi_{text{in}}=-int vec{E}_{text{in}}dvec{r}=-dfrac{Qr^2}{8pi epsilon_0 R^3} + C_1$



$phi_{text{out}}=-int vec{E}_{text{out}}dvec{r}=dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 r} +C_2$



This is literally all the information I've been given. I really don't know what these integrals are, nor how they follow from the above equation. I can see that the result of the first integral for example is just the indefinite integral $-int dfrac{Q}{4pi epsilon_0 R^3}r dr$ but I can't see how this stage was reached.



Any clarification would be much appreciated!







calculus integration multivariable-calculus vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jun 25 '14 at 21:15









James MachinJames Machin

610616




610616












  • $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – rajb245
    Jun 25 '14 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Jan 9 '17 at 5:05












  • $begingroup$
    The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    $vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    May 12 '18 at 16:44


















  • $begingroup$
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
    $endgroup$
    – rajb245
    Jun 25 '14 at 22:21










  • $begingroup$
    You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    Jan 9 '17 at 5:05












  • $begingroup$
    The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    $vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
    $endgroup$
    – Felix Marin
    May 12 '18 at 16:44
















$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21




$begingroup$
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_theorem
$endgroup$
– rajb245
Jun 25 '14 at 22:21












$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05






$begingroup$
You have $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}} = Qr/(4piepsilon_0 R^3)$. But $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ is a vector and the RHS of that equation is a scalar. You need a direction for $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{in}}$ (and the same applies to $mathbf{E}_{mathrm{out}}$).
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
Jan 9 '17 at 5:05














$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46




$begingroup$
The OP should express anew his interest in an answer to his problem. Otherwise this question can be deleted, and should no longer be bumped to the main page every two weeks.
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 27 '17 at 18:46












$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44




$begingroup$
$vec{r}cdotmathrm{d}vec{r} = r,mathrm{d}r$
$endgroup$
– Felix Marin
May 12 '18 at 16:44










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
$$
int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
$$
and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
    $endgroup$
    – James Machin
    Jun 27 '14 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    This is a bad answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:44



















0












$begingroup$

$newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
begin{align}
Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
left{begin{array}{l}
mbox{Note that}
\
ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
\ =
ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
end{array}right.}}
+ Phipars{vec{a}}
\[5mm] & =
-,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
end{align}




Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
$bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
    $endgroup$
    – splitcomplexes
    Nov 2 '18 at 9:02





















0












$begingroup$

What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
$$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f847607%2ffinding-a-scalar-field-whose-gradient-is-a-given-conservative-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
    $$
    int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
    $$
    and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
      $endgroup$
      – James Machin
      Jun 27 '14 at 0:21










    • $begingroup$
      This is a bad answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Christian Blatter
      Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
















    0












    $begingroup$

    The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
    $$
    int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
    $$
    and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
      $endgroup$
      – James Machin
      Jun 27 '14 at 0:21










    • $begingroup$
      This is a bad answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Christian Blatter
      Nov 27 '17 at 18:44














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
    $$
    int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
    $$
    and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The integrals are over the surface $S$ of the sphere (at radius $R$). The confusion might be because you overlooked a $cdot$. The integrand is the dot product of $vec{E}$ with the unit normal to the surface, which your professor has written as $dvec{r}$ but wouild more commonly be written as $dS$. The integral can be read in spherical coordinates as
    $$
    int_S E_r(R, theta, phi) r,dtheta,dphi
    $$
    and the $vec{E}cdot vec{r}$ is just expressing that you need to take the $r$ component of the field.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jun 25 '14 at 22:28









    Mark FischlerMark Fischler

    33.8k12552




    33.8k12552












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
      $endgroup$
      – James Machin
      Jun 27 '14 at 0:21










    • $begingroup$
      This is a bad answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Christian Blatter
      Nov 27 '17 at 18:44


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
      $endgroup$
      – James Machin
      Jun 27 '14 at 0:21










    • $begingroup$
      This is a bad answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Christian Blatter
      Nov 27 '17 at 18:44
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
    $endgroup$
    – James Machin
    Jun 27 '14 at 0:21




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for the reply! Yeah the dot wasn't written in the solutions but I assumed that that's what my professor meant. I don't understand why this surface integral gives the potential though. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by the $r$ component - is that $E_r$? I don't know what $E_r$ is if I'm honest!
    $endgroup$
    – James Machin
    Jun 27 '14 at 0:21












    $begingroup$
    This is a bad answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:44




    $begingroup$
    This is a bad answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 27 '17 at 18:44











    0












    $begingroup$

    $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
    newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
    newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
    newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
    newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
    newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
    newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
    newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
    newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
    newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
    newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
    begin{align}
    Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
    left{begin{array}{l}
    mbox{Note that}
    \
    ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
    \ =
    ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
    end{array}right.}}
    + Phipars{vec{a}}
    \[5mm] & =
    -,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
    end{align}




    Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
    $bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
      $endgroup$
      – splitcomplexes
      Nov 2 '18 at 9:02


















    0












    $begingroup$

    $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
    newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
    newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
    newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
    newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
    newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
    newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
    newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
    newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
    newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
    newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
    begin{align}
    Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
    left{begin{array}{l}
    mbox{Note that}
    \
    ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
    \ =
    ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
    end{array}right.}}
    + Phipars{vec{a}}
    \[5mm] & =
    -,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
    end{align}




    Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
    $bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
      $endgroup$
      – splitcomplexes
      Nov 2 '18 at 9:02
















    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
    newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
    newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
    newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
    newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
    newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
    newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
    newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
    newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
    newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
    newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
    begin{align}
    Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
    left{begin{array}{l}
    mbox{Note that}
    \
    ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
    \ =
    ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
    end{array}right.}}
    + Phipars{vec{a}}
    \[5mm] & =
    -,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
    end{align}




    Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
    $bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.







    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $newcommand{bbx}[1]{,bbox[15px,border:1px groove navy]{displaystyle{#1}},}
    newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
    newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
    newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
    newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
    newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
    newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
    newcommand{mc}[1]{mathcal{#1}}
    newcommand{mrm}[1]{mathrm{#1}}
    newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
    newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
    newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
    newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
    begin{align}
    Phipars{vec{r}} & = -int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}vec{mrm{E}}pars{vec{s}}cdotddvec{s} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    overbrace{int_{vec{a}}^{vec{r}}{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}s^{2}},{vec{s} over s}cdotddvec{s}}^{ds{%
    left{begin{array}{l}
    mbox{Note that}
    \
    ds{vec{s}cdotddvec{s} = {1 over 2},ddpars{vec{s}cdotvec{s}}}
    \ =
    ds{{1 over 2},ddpars{s^{2}} = color{red}{s,dd s}}
    end{array}right.}}
    + Phipars{vec{a}}
    \[5mm] & =
    -,{Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}int_{a}^{r}{dd s over s^{2}} + Phipars{vec{a}} =
    {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}}pars{{1 over r} - {1 over a}} + Phipars{vec{a}}
    end{align}




    Set $ds{Phipars{vec{a}} = 0}$ as $ds{a to infty}$ such that
    $bbx{ds{Phipars{vec{r}} = {Q over 4piepsilon_{0}r}}}$.








    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered May 12 '18 at 17:04









    Felix MarinFelix Marin

    68.8k7109146




    68.8k7109146












    • $begingroup$
      -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
      $endgroup$
      – splitcomplexes
      Nov 2 '18 at 9:02




















    • $begingroup$
      -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
      $endgroup$
      – splitcomplexes
      Nov 2 '18 at 9:02


















    $begingroup$
    -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
    $endgroup$
    – splitcomplexes
    Nov 2 '18 at 9:02






    $begingroup$
    -this is the potential only for $r geq R$, correct? Its gradient does not give the electric field $vec{E}_{in}$ for $r leq R$.
    $endgroup$
    – splitcomplexes
    Nov 2 '18 at 9:02













    0












    $begingroup$

    What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
    $$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
      $$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
        $$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        What the OP has given as the electric fields inside and outside the sphere are only the magnitudes of these fields, as has been emphasized in other comments and answers. I suspect that those expressions were derived using Gauss' Law, which relied on spherical symmetry to assume two things: (i) that the field at a point with position vector $vec{r}$, a distance $r = |vec{r}|$ from the center of the sphere, depended only on this distance, and (ii) that the field was directed radially outward from the center of the sphere along the unit vector $hat{r} = vec{r}/r$. So the electric field vector is a piecewise continuous function of the radial coordinate $r$ alone, with direction $hat{r}$, given by
        $$begin{align}vec{E}(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~vec{E}_{in}(r) = dfrac{q}{R^3},r,hat{r}, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ vec{E}_{out}(r) = dfrac{q}{r^2},hat{r}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ where I am writing $$q = dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0}$$ for convenience. Since $vec{E}(r)= -nabla phi(r)$ depends only on the radial coordinate $r$, it reduces to $$vec{E}(r) = -dfrac{dphi}{dr}(r),hat{r}.$$ The negative derivative of the scalar function $phi(r)$ with respect to $r$ thus gives the radial (and only) component of $vec{E}$, so from the piecewise expressions for the electric field we find the piecewise expressions for the derivative of $phi$: $$begin{align}-dfrac{dphi}{dr} = begin{cases}~~dfrac{q}{R^3},r, ~~~ r leq R, \ \~~ dfrac{q}{r^2}, ~~~ r geq R, end{cases}end{align}$$ The indefinite integral of each side in the two cases gives $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{R^3},r,dr = - dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + C_1, ~~~~r leq R,$$ and $$phi(r) = -intdfrac{q}{r^2},dr = dfrac{q}{r} + C_2, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In the second expression with $r geq R$, in order for the potential to vanish as $r to infty$, we must set the integration constant $C_2 = 0$, hence $$phi(r) = dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~~r geq R.$$ In order for the potential to be continuous at $r = R$, the potentials must be equal at the boundary: $$-dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{R^2}{2} + C_1 = dfrac{q}{R},$$ from which we find $$C_1 = dfrac{3q}{2R}.$$ The scalar potential is thus given by the piecewise continuous function $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~ -dfrac{q}{R^3}dfrac{r^2}{2} + dfrac{3q}{2R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \~~ dfrac{q}{r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$ In terms of $q = Q/4piepsilon_0$, these are $$begin{align}phi(r) ,=, begin{cases}~~-dfrac{Q}{8piepsilon_0 R^3},r^2 + dfrac{3Q}{8piepsilon_0 R}, ~~~r leq R,\ \ ~~dfrac{Q}{4piepsilon_0 r}, ~~~r geq R.end{cases}end{align}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 2 '18 at 9:05

























        answered Nov 2 '18 at 8:58









        splitcomplexessplitcomplexes

        864




        864






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f847607%2ffinding-a-scalar-field-whose-gradient-is-a-given-conservative-vector-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?