File not found error on Visual Studio Code when clicking on problems window (using make, gcc and gcc...
I work on a project which uses "make and gcc" to compile all its modules. These modules are on their own folders and have their own Makefiles. A global Makefile calls them in order to compile the binary.
So now I am trying to use Visual Studio Code as my IDE. I have set up the compilation environment and it works well.
The only problem is whenever there is some warning/compilation, clicking on them doesn’t open the proper file. My working directory will be similar to the below shown simplified code.
D:SO
|-- common
| |-- main.c
| `-- Makefile
`-- Makefile
From the tasks I will be calling the outside Makefile, which will call the Makefile inside common. And in the main.c, I have deliberately deleted stdio.h header file inclusion, which should show an implicit declaration error.
But when I click warnings on problem window, VS code throws an error showing the file is not found. VS Code tries to open "D:SOmain.c", but the file is actually inside "D:SOcommonmain.c"
Outer Makefile
all:
(cd common && make )
Inner Makefile (inside common directory)
all:
gcc main.c
main.c
int main(int argc, char *argv)
{
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
tasks.json
{
// See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=733558
// for the documentation about the tasks.json format
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "make",
"command": "make",
"type": "shell",
"problemMatcher": [
"$gcc"
]
}
]
}
I have tried to tweak the problemMatcher by giving different combinations for fileLocation parameter. But they don’t yield a proper result. So I haven't included it here.
I am using Visual Studio Code 1.14.2 on Windows 10 1607 x64 with a mingw-gcc.
visual-studio-code vscode-settings vscode-tasks
add a comment |
I work on a project which uses "make and gcc" to compile all its modules. These modules are on their own folders and have their own Makefiles. A global Makefile calls them in order to compile the binary.
So now I am trying to use Visual Studio Code as my IDE. I have set up the compilation environment and it works well.
The only problem is whenever there is some warning/compilation, clicking on them doesn’t open the proper file. My working directory will be similar to the below shown simplified code.
D:SO
|-- common
| |-- main.c
| `-- Makefile
`-- Makefile
From the tasks I will be calling the outside Makefile, which will call the Makefile inside common. And in the main.c, I have deliberately deleted stdio.h header file inclusion, which should show an implicit declaration error.
But when I click warnings on problem window, VS code throws an error showing the file is not found. VS Code tries to open "D:SOmain.c", but the file is actually inside "D:SOcommonmain.c"
Outer Makefile
all:
(cd common && make )
Inner Makefile (inside common directory)
all:
gcc main.c
main.c
int main(int argc, char *argv)
{
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
tasks.json
{
// See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=733558
// for the documentation about the tasks.json format
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "make",
"command": "make",
"type": "shell",
"problemMatcher": [
"$gcc"
]
}
]
}
I have tried to tweak the problemMatcher by giving different combinations for fileLocation parameter. But they don’t yield a proper result. So I haven't included it here.
I am using Visual Studio Code 1.14.2 on Windows 10 1607 x64 with a mingw-gcc.
visual-studio-code vscode-settings vscode-tasks
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is forfileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.
– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
I work on a project which uses "make and gcc" to compile all its modules. These modules are on their own folders and have their own Makefiles. A global Makefile calls them in order to compile the binary.
So now I am trying to use Visual Studio Code as my IDE. I have set up the compilation environment and it works well.
The only problem is whenever there is some warning/compilation, clicking on them doesn’t open the proper file. My working directory will be similar to the below shown simplified code.
D:SO
|-- common
| |-- main.c
| `-- Makefile
`-- Makefile
From the tasks I will be calling the outside Makefile, which will call the Makefile inside common. And in the main.c, I have deliberately deleted stdio.h header file inclusion, which should show an implicit declaration error.
But when I click warnings on problem window, VS code throws an error showing the file is not found. VS Code tries to open "D:SOmain.c", but the file is actually inside "D:SOcommonmain.c"
Outer Makefile
all:
(cd common && make )
Inner Makefile (inside common directory)
all:
gcc main.c
main.c
int main(int argc, char *argv)
{
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
tasks.json
{
// See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=733558
// for the documentation about the tasks.json format
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "make",
"command": "make",
"type": "shell",
"problemMatcher": [
"$gcc"
]
}
]
}
I have tried to tweak the problemMatcher by giving different combinations for fileLocation parameter. But they don’t yield a proper result. So I haven't included it here.
I am using Visual Studio Code 1.14.2 on Windows 10 1607 x64 with a mingw-gcc.
visual-studio-code vscode-settings vscode-tasks
I work on a project which uses "make and gcc" to compile all its modules. These modules are on their own folders and have their own Makefiles. A global Makefile calls them in order to compile the binary.
So now I am trying to use Visual Studio Code as my IDE. I have set up the compilation environment and it works well.
The only problem is whenever there is some warning/compilation, clicking on them doesn’t open the proper file. My working directory will be similar to the below shown simplified code.
D:SO
|-- common
| |-- main.c
| `-- Makefile
`-- Makefile
From the tasks I will be calling the outside Makefile, which will call the Makefile inside common. And in the main.c, I have deliberately deleted stdio.h header file inclusion, which should show an implicit declaration error.
But when I click warnings on problem window, VS code throws an error showing the file is not found. VS Code tries to open "D:SOmain.c", but the file is actually inside "D:SOcommonmain.c"
Outer Makefile
all:
(cd common && make )
Inner Makefile (inside common directory)
all:
gcc main.c
main.c
int main(int argc, char *argv)
{
printf("Hello World");
return 0;
}
tasks.json
{
// See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=733558
// for the documentation about the tasks.json format
"version": "2.0.0",
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "make",
"command": "make",
"type": "shell",
"problemMatcher": [
"$gcc"
]
}
]
}
I have tried to tweak the problemMatcher by giving different combinations for fileLocation parameter. But they don’t yield a proper result. So I haven't included it here.
I am using Visual Studio Code 1.14.2 on Windows 10 1607 x64 with a mingw-gcc.
visual-studio-code vscode-settings vscode-tasks
visual-studio-code vscode-settings vscode-tasks
edited Aug 9 '17 at 16:05
halfer
14.7k759116
14.7k759116
asked Aug 9 '17 at 14:54
MrPavanayiMrPavanayi
512412
512412
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is forfileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.
– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is forfileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.
– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is for
fileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is for
fileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This isn't an answer to your question, but I expect it would be a prerequisite to any solution that Microsoft or others could provide.
You have a bug in your nested Makefiles. You should never do this pattern in a Makefile:
cd somewhere; make target
The cd
is unnecessary (see below), but the use of make
directly is a problem. Such a pattern messes up the ability for one invocation of make to pass information to sub-makes. In particular, it messes up parallel make. It also invokes make
with the current shell path, which might not be the make
that was originally used. You should always use this pattern instead:
$(MAKE) -C somewhere target
The -C dir
parameter tells make where to set its current working directory. And using $(MAKE)
allows flags and parameters to be passed down.
Since this is the recommended nested-Makefile pattern, I would think that any parsing that vscode would do to determine the appropriate fileLocation
would likely require it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45594118%2ffile-not-found-error-on-visual-studio-code-when-clicking-on-problems-window-usi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This isn't an answer to your question, but I expect it would be a prerequisite to any solution that Microsoft or others could provide.
You have a bug in your nested Makefiles. You should never do this pattern in a Makefile:
cd somewhere; make target
The cd
is unnecessary (see below), but the use of make
directly is a problem. Such a pattern messes up the ability for one invocation of make to pass information to sub-makes. In particular, it messes up parallel make. It also invokes make
with the current shell path, which might not be the make
that was originally used. You should always use this pattern instead:
$(MAKE) -C somewhere target
The -C dir
parameter tells make where to set its current working directory. And using $(MAKE)
allows flags and parameters to be passed down.
Since this is the recommended nested-Makefile pattern, I would think that any parsing that vscode would do to determine the appropriate fileLocation
would likely require it.
add a comment |
This isn't an answer to your question, but I expect it would be a prerequisite to any solution that Microsoft or others could provide.
You have a bug in your nested Makefiles. You should never do this pattern in a Makefile:
cd somewhere; make target
The cd
is unnecessary (see below), but the use of make
directly is a problem. Such a pattern messes up the ability for one invocation of make to pass information to sub-makes. In particular, it messes up parallel make. It also invokes make
with the current shell path, which might not be the make
that was originally used. You should always use this pattern instead:
$(MAKE) -C somewhere target
The -C dir
parameter tells make where to set its current working directory. And using $(MAKE)
allows flags and parameters to be passed down.
Since this is the recommended nested-Makefile pattern, I would think that any parsing that vscode would do to determine the appropriate fileLocation
would likely require it.
add a comment |
This isn't an answer to your question, but I expect it would be a prerequisite to any solution that Microsoft or others could provide.
You have a bug in your nested Makefiles. You should never do this pattern in a Makefile:
cd somewhere; make target
The cd
is unnecessary (see below), but the use of make
directly is a problem. Such a pattern messes up the ability for one invocation of make to pass information to sub-makes. In particular, it messes up parallel make. It also invokes make
with the current shell path, which might not be the make
that was originally used. You should always use this pattern instead:
$(MAKE) -C somewhere target
The -C dir
parameter tells make where to set its current working directory. And using $(MAKE)
allows flags and parameters to be passed down.
Since this is the recommended nested-Makefile pattern, I would think that any parsing that vscode would do to determine the appropriate fileLocation
would likely require it.
This isn't an answer to your question, but I expect it would be a prerequisite to any solution that Microsoft or others could provide.
You have a bug in your nested Makefiles. You should never do this pattern in a Makefile:
cd somewhere; make target
The cd
is unnecessary (see below), but the use of make
directly is a problem. Such a pattern messes up the ability for one invocation of make to pass information to sub-makes. In particular, it messes up parallel make. It also invokes make
with the current shell path, which might not be the make
that was originally used. You should always use this pattern instead:
$(MAKE) -C somewhere target
The -C dir
parameter tells make where to set its current working directory. And using $(MAKE)
allows flags and parameters to be passed down.
Since this is the recommended nested-Makefile pattern, I would think that any parsing that vscode would do to determine the appropriate fileLocation
would likely require it.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 20:54
seanahernseanahern
10510
10510
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f45594118%2ffile-not-found-error-on-visual-studio-code-when-clicking-on-problems-window-usi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
this problem just started for me after the last vscode update. Sucks because i was just starting to like it after using it for about 3 weeks. We should be coding....not troubleshooting our IDE.
– jtlindsey
Mar 13 '18 at 0:31
FWIW, I'm also running into this problem. More than a year later. What we want is for
fileLocation
to be automatically computed on a per-Makefile basis.– seanahern
Nov 21 '18 at 20:48