Compactness of the space of measure-preserving maps
$begingroup$
Let $X, Y$ be Polish spaces and $mu, nu$ be Borel probablity measures on $X, Y$, respectively. Assume that $mu$ is non-atomic. Denote by $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ a set of Borel measurable mappings $T$ from $X$ to $Y$ which preserve measures (i.e. for any Borel set $B$ of $Y$, we have $mu(T^{-1}(B))=nu(B)$). Is the set $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ compact with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X, Y$ be Polish spaces and $mu, nu$ be Borel probablity measures on $X, Y$, respectively. Assume that $mu$ is non-atomic. Denote by $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ a set of Borel measurable mappings $T$ from $X$ to $Y$ which preserve measures (i.e. for any Borel set $B$ of $Y$, we have $mu(T^{-1}(B))=nu(B)$). Is the set $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ compact with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
1
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X, Y$ be Polish spaces and $mu, nu$ be Borel probablity measures on $X, Y$, respectively. Assume that $mu$ is non-atomic. Denote by $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ a set of Borel measurable mappings $T$ from $X$ to $Y$ which preserve measures (i.e. for any Borel set $B$ of $Y$, we have $mu(T^{-1}(B))=nu(B)$). Is the set $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ compact with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
Let $X, Y$ be Polish spaces and $mu, nu$ be Borel probablity measures on $X, Y$, respectively. Assume that $mu$ is non-atomic. Denote by $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ a set of Borel measurable mappings $T$ from $X$ to $Y$ which preserve measures (i.e. for any Borel set $B$ of $Y$, we have $mu(T^{-1}(B))=nu(B)$). Is the set $mathcal{M}(mu,nu)$ compact with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure?
real-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis measure-theory
asked Dec 7 '18 at 11:22
NickNick
162
162
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
1
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
1
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
1
1
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029795%2fcompactness-of-the-space-of-measure-preserving-maps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029795%2fcompactness-of-the-space-of-measure-preserving-maps%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What do mean with 'with respect to the convergence of $mu$-measure'?
$endgroup$
– p4sch
Dec 7 '18 at 12:29
1
$begingroup$
I made some mistakes. Convergence ''in'' $mu$-measure, not convergence ''of'' $mu$-measure. We need to fix a distance $d$ on $Y$. A sequence ${T_n}$ of Borel measurable maps from $X$ to $Y$ converges in $mu$-measure to a Borel measurable map $Tcolon Xto Y$ if for any $epsilon>0$, $mu({xin X mid d(T_n(x),T(x))>varepsilon})$ tends to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Dec 7 '18 at 13:04