Closed Forms of Certain Zeta constants?












0












$begingroup$


The Riemann Zeta function $zeta(s)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n^s}$ converges for $operatorname{Re}(s)>1$. I am interested in some particular "irrational " values of it such as:





  • $zeta(pi)=1.176241738ldots$,


  • $zeta(e)=1.2690096043ldots$,


  • $zeta(sqrt2)=3.020737679ldots$,

  • $ldots$


Are there closed form representations for these and constants? Are there formulas which consists of these constants?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:32












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Patel
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:36












  • $begingroup$
    Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:42






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurkyl
    Sep 28 '13 at 17:32
















0












$begingroup$


The Riemann Zeta function $zeta(s)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n^s}$ converges for $operatorname{Re}(s)>1$. I am interested in some particular "irrational " values of it such as:





  • $zeta(pi)=1.176241738ldots$,


  • $zeta(e)=1.2690096043ldots$,


  • $zeta(sqrt2)=3.020737679ldots$,

  • $ldots$


Are there closed form representations for these and constants? Are there formulas which consists of these constants?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:32












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Patel
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:36












  • $begingroup$
    Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:42






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurkyl
    Sep 28 '13 at 17:32














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The Riemann Zeta function $zeta(s)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n^s}$ converges for $operatorname{Re}(s)>1$. I am interested in some particular "irrational " values of it such as:





  • $zeta(pi)=1.176241738ldots$,


  • $zeta(e)=1.2690096043ldots$,


  • $zeta(sqrt2)=3.020737679ldots$,

  • $ldots$


Are there closed form representations for these and constants? Are there formulas which consists of these constants?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Riemann Zeta function $zeta(s)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n^s}$ converges for $operatorname{Re}(s)>1$. I am interested in some particular "irrational " values of it such as:





  • $zeta(pi)=1.176241738ldots$,


  • $zeta(e)=1.2690096043ldots$,


  • $zeta(sqrt2)=3.020737679ldots$,

  • $ldots$


Are there closed form representations for these and constants? Are there formulas which consists of these constants?







riemann-zeta closed-form constants






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 10:07









José Carlos Santos

166k22132235




166k22132235










asked Sep 28 '13 at 16:24









Shivam PatelShivam Patel

2,11111725




2,11111725








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:32












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Patel
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:36












  • $begingroup$
    Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:42






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurkyl
    Sep 28 '13 at 17:32














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:32












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
    $endgroup$
    – Shivam Patel
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:36












  • $begingroup$
    Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Sep 28 '13 at 16:42






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurkyl
    Sep 28 '13 at 17:32








2




2




$begingroup$
The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 28 '13 at 16:32






$begingroup$
The Riemann Zeta Function exists for all complex numbers except for $;z=1;$ ....Perhaps you meant the summatory form $$sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{n^s};,;;text{which converges for Re},(s)>1; ?$$
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 28 '13 at 16:32














$begingroup$
Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
$endgroup$
– Shivam Patel
Sep 28 '13 at 16:36






$begingroup$
Yes that. Specially !and @DonAntonio does the Riemann zeta function exists for $0$ too?
$endgroup$
– Shivam Patel
Sep 28 '13 at 16:36














$begingroup$
Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 28 '13 at 16:42




$begingroup$
Yes Shivam: for any complex value except $;1;$ .
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Sep 28 '13 at 16:42




2




2




$begingroup$
In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
$endgroup$
– Hurkyl
Sep 28 '13 at 17:32




$begingroup$
In some sense, $zeta(sqrt{2})$ is already a closed form.
$endgroup$
– Hurkyl
Sep 28 '13 at 17:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

There is no reason to suspect that these have a "closed form". There isn't even a known closed form for $zeta(3)$...






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507957%2fclosed-forms-of-certain-zeta-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    There is no reason to suspect that these have a "closed form". There isn't even a known closed form for $zeta(3)$...






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      There is no reason to suspect that these have a "closed form". There isn't even a known closed form for $zeta(3)$...






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        There is no reason to suspect that these have a "closed form". There isn't even a known closed form for $zeta(3)$...






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There is no reason to suspect that these have a "closed form". There isn't even a known closed form for $zeta(3)$...







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Sep 28 '13 at 17:15









        Bruno JoyalBruno Joyal

        42.9k695186




        42.9k695186






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507957%2fclosed-forms-of-certain-zeta-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents