How to say “How to aim [well/right/correctly]”?












4















Imagine reading this as a headline in a learner's text book on a shooting range:




How to aim right

How to aim correctly

How to aim well




Basically, I want to say "how to aim to hit the target" in this passive manner and I'm trying to find the proper adjective to use for this. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question


















  • 5





    Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

    – Juhasz
    Feb 8 at 14:44











  • Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

    – Robusto
    Feb 8 at 14:46






  • 1





    [You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 8 at 14:51













  • @FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

    – Aethenosity
    Feb 9 at 20:36













  • @Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 10 at 17:20
















4















Imagine reading this as a headline in a learner's text book on a shooting range:




How to aim right

How to aim correctly

How to aim well




Basically, I want to say "how to aim to hit the target" in this passive manner and I'm trying to find the proper adjective to use for this. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question


















  • 5





    Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

    – Juhasz
    Feb 8 at 14:44











  • Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

    – Robusto
    Feb 8 at 14:46






  • 1





    [You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 8 at 14:51













  • @FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

    – Aethenosity
    Feb 9 at 20:36













  • @Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 10 at 17:20














4












4








4








Imagine reading this as a headline in a learner's text book on a shooting range:




How to aim right

How to aim correctly

How to aim well




Basically, I want to say "how to aim to hit the target" in this passive manner and I'm trying to find the proper adjective to use for this. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question














Imagine reading this as a headline in a learner's text book on a shooting range:




How to aim right

How to aim correctly

How to aim well




Basically, I want to say "how to aim to hit the target" in this passive manner and I'm trying to find the proper adjective to use for this. Any suggestions?







word-choice






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 8 at 14:41









SteevenSteeven

309513




309513








  • 5





    Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

    – Juhasz
    Feb 8 at 14:44











  • Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

    – Robusto
    Feb 8 at 14:46






  • 1





    [You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 8 at 14:51













  • @FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

    – Aethenosity
    Feb 9 at 20:36













  • @Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 10 at 17:20














  • 5





    Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

    – Juhasz
    Feb 8 at 14:44











  • Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

    – Robusto
    Feb 8 at 14:46






  • 1





    [You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 8 at 14:51













  • @FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

    – Aethenosity
    Feb 9 at 20:36













  • @Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

    – FumbleFingers
    Feb 10 at 17:20








5




5





Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

– Juhasz
Feb 8 at 14:44





Are you sure you need any adverb (not adjective)? What's wrong with "How to Aim"? There is no way "how to aim" would ever mean "how to aim poorly."

– Juhasz
Feb 8 at 14:44













Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

– Robusto
Feb 8 at 14:46





Instead of those, how about "How to hit the target?" or "Aiming to hit the target?"

– Robusto
Feb 8 at 14:46




1




1





[You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

– FumbleFingers
Feb 8 at 14:51







[You must learn] how to aim sounds just a bit too "clipped" for me in this context. I'd prefer ...how to take aim.

– FumbleFingers
Feb 8 at 14:51















@FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

– Aethenosity
Feb 9 at 20:36







@FumbleFingers how to aim a shotgun sounds much better than how to take aim with a shotgun. Even if it ends with aim, take aim makes it sound wordy. The addition of take even adds a bit of ambiguity imo

– Aethenosity
Feb 9 at 20:36















@Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

– FumbleFingers
Feb 10 at 17:20





@Aethenosity: Unlike you, I have no particular preference for or against either if followed by [with, using,...] a shotgun. But the question as posed doesn't include that additional context.

– FumbleFingers
Feb 10 at 17:20










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11














Aim right is a little ambiguous. It could mean to aim in the appropriate manner, to aim so as to hit the target, or to adjust your aim to the right.



Aim correctly would, to me, mean to aim in the correct manner - to do so in the way you are taught to aim.



Aim well would, to me, mean to take your time to aim, not rush. Unless it were "how to aim well", in which case it would mean instructions on how to aim effectively or correctly.



Aim accurately would be to aim in a way that means you hit the target.



Aim properly would capture several of these, not rushing, doing it in the correct manner, and that doing so would tend to allow you to hit the target.






share|improve this answer
























  • I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

    – jpmc26
    Feb 9 at 7:14






  • 1





    Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

    – SamBC
    Feb 9 at 10:13











  • Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

    – Steeven
    Feb 12 at 8:04



















8














Actually, no qualifier is needed. The expression:




How to aim a [pistol/rifle/weapon/etc]




is perfectly natural (example). By default, when you instruct someone how to do something, it's assumed you are telling them how to do it correctly.



However, if you want to emphasize that there is a correct method and and an incorrect method you could say something like:




How to correctly aim [a weapon].




As SamBC mentions, you can substitute various synonyms for "correctly": properly, accurately, appropriately, effectively, etc. You can also suggest you're teaching a particular technique: quickly, smoothly, steadily, etc. Example:




How to safely and accurately aim and fire a fully automatic weapon.




Also, by default, when you "aim" a weapon it's assumed to be at some target. Otherwise you're not really aiming it, but rather just pointing it in some vague direction.



As an alternative, you can use the idiomatic expression "take aim", which is commonly associated with the action of aiming a weapon, rather than some metaphorical aim.




How to correctly take aim at your target (when firing a semiautomatic rifle).







share|improve this answer


























  • Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

    – SamBC
    Feb 8 at 16:59






  • 1





    @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

    – Andrew
    Feb 8 at 18:42





















1














Idiomatically, the phrase to aim true might work. "True" here is in the sense of "straight, accurate, and without deviation", rather than the more common sense of "a statement agreeing with the facts". As an example, we have the headline How to Aim True at the F-class World Championships.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195871%2fhow-to-say-how-to-aim-well-right-correctly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    Aim right is a little ambiguous. It could mean to aim in the appropriate manner, to aim so as to hit the target, or to adjust your aim to the right.



    Aim correctly would, to me, mean to aim in the correct manner - to do so in the way you are taught to aim.



    Aim well would, to me, mean to take your time to aim, not rush. Unless it were "how to aim well", in which case it would mean instructions on how to aim effectively or correctly.



    Aim accurately would be to aim in a way that means you hit the target.



    Aim properly would capture several of these, not rushing, doing it in the correct manner, and that doing so would tend to allow you to hit the target.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

      – jpmc26
      Feb 9 at 7:14






    • 1





      Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

      – SamBC
      Feb 9 at 10:13











    • Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

      – Steeven
      Feb 12 at 8:04
















    11














    Aim right is a little ambiguous. It could mean to aim in the appropriate manner, to aim so as to hit the target, or to adjust your aim to the right.



    Aim correctly would, to me, mean to aim in the correct manner - to do so in the way you are taught to aim.



    Aim well would, to me, mean to take your time to aim, not rush. Unless it were "how to aim well", in which case it would mean instructions on how to aim effectively or correctly.



    Aim accurately would be to aim in a way that means you hit the target.



    Aim properly would capture several of these, not rushing, doing it in the correct manner, and that doing so would tend to allow you to hit the target.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

      – jpmc26
      Feb 9 at 7:14






    • 1





      Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

      – SamBC
      Feb 9 at 10:13











    • Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

      – Steeven
      Feb 12 at 8:04














    11












    11








    11







    Aim right is a little ambiguous. It could mean to aim in the appropriate manner, to aim so as to hit the target, or to adjust your aim to the right.



    Aim correctly would, to me, mean to aim in the correct manner - to do so in the way you are taught to aim.



    Aim well would, to me, mean to take your time to aim, not rush. Unless it were "how to aim well", in which case it would mean instructions on how to aim effectively or correctly.



    Aim accurately would be to aim in a way that means you hit the target.



    Aim properly would capture several of these, not rushing, doing it in the correct manner, and that doing so would tend to allow you to hit the target.






    share|improve this answer













    Aim right is a little ambiguous. It could mean to aim in the appropriate manner, to aim so as to hit the target, or to adjust your aim to the right.



    Aim correctly would, to me, mean to aim in the correct manner - to do so in the way you are taught to aim.



    Aim well would, to me, mean to take your time to aim, not rush. Unless it were "how to aim well", in which case it would mean instructions on how to aim effectively or correctly.



    Aim accurately would be to aim in a way that means you hit the target.



    Aim properly would capture several of these, not rushing, doing it in the correct manner, and that doing so would tend to allow you to hit the target.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Feb 8 at 14:45









    SamBCSamBC

    3,738321




    3,738321













    • I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

      – jpmc26
      Feb 9 at 7:14






    • 1





      Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

      – SamBC
      Feb 9 at 10:13











    • Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

      – Steeven
      Feb 12 at 8:04



















    • I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

      – jpmc26
      Feb 9 at 7:14






    • 1





      Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

      – SamBC
      Feb 9 at 10:13











    • Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

      – Steeven
      Feb 12 at 8:04

















    I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

    – jpmc26
    Feb 9 at 7:14





    I would say "well" and "properly" are extremely similar in many if not most contexts.

    – jpmc26
    Feb 9 at 7:14




    1




    1





    Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

    – SamBC
    Feb 9 at 10:13





    Well is one of those words that can have a subtle range of meanings, I think. "Think well" can mean "think carefully", but to "do well" at something means to be successful - and to "think well of" someone means to have a positive view of them. In this context, I would tend to read it towards the "carefully" sense.

    – SamBC
    Feb 9 at 10:13













    Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

    – Steeven
    Feb 12 at 8:04





    Thanks for the answers. I chose to go with Aim properly for my context.

    – Steeven
    Feb 12 at 8:04













    8














    Actually, no qualifier is needed. The expression:




    How to aim a [pistol/rifle/weapon/etc]




    is perfectly natural (example). By default, when you instruct someone how to do something, it's assumed you are telling them how to do it correctly.



    However, if you want to emphasize that there is a correct method and and an incorrect method you could say something like:




    How to correctly aim [a weapon].




    As SamBC mentions, you can substitute various synonyms for "correctly": properly, accurately, appropriately, effectively, etc. You can also suggest you're teaching a particular technique: quickly, smoothly, steadily, etc. Example:




    How to safely and accurately aim and fire a fully automatic weapon.




    Also, by default, when you "aim" a weapon it's assumed to be at some target. Otherwise you're not really aiming it, but rather just pointing it in some vague direction.



    As an alternative, you can use the idiomatic expression "take aim", which is commonly associated with the action of aiming a weapon, rather than some metaphorical aim.




    How to correctly take aim at your target (when firing a semiautomatic rifle).







    share|improve this answer


























    • Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

      – SamBC
      Feb 8 at 16:59






    • 1





      @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

      – Andrew
      Feb 8 at 18:42


















    8














    Actually, no qualifier is needed. The expression:




    How to aim a [pistol/rifle/weapon/etc]




    is perfectly natural (example). By default, when you instruct someone how to do something, it's assumed you are telling them how to do it correctly.



    However, if you want to emphasize that there is a correct method and and an incorrect method you could say something like:




    How to correctly aim [a weapon].




    As SamBC mentions, you can substitute various synonyms for "correctly": properly, accurately, appropriately, effectively, etc. You can also suggest you're teaching a particular technique: quickly, smoothly, steadily, etc. Example:




    How to safely and accurately aim and fire a fully automatic weapon.




    Also, by default, when you "aim" a weapon it's assumed to be at some target. Otherwise you're not really aiming it, but rather just pointing it in some vague direction.



    As an alternative, you can use the idiomatic expression "take aim", which is commonly associated with the action of aiming a weapon, rather than some metaphorical aim.




    How to correctly take aim at your target (when firing a semiautomatic rifle).







    share|improve this answer


























    • Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

      – SamBC
      Feb 8 at 16:59






    • 1





      @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

      – Andrew
      Feb 8 at 18:42
















    8












    8








    8







    Actually, no qualifier is needed. The expression:




    How to aim a [pistol/rifle/weapon/etc]




    is perfectly natural (example). By default, when you instruct someone how to do something, it's assumed you are telling them how to do it correctly.



    However, if you want to emphasize that there is a correct method and and an incorrect method you could say something like:




    How to correctly aim [a weapon].




    As SamBC mentions, you can substitute various synonyms for "correctly": properly, accurately, appropriately, effectively, etc. You can also suggest you're teaching a particular technique: quickly, smoothly, steadily, etc. Example:




    How to safely and accurately aim and fire a fully automatic weapon.




    Also, by default, when you "aim" a weapon it's assumed to be at some target. Otherwise you're not really aiming it, but rather just pointing it in some vague direction.



    As an alternative, you can use the idiomatic expression "take aim", which is commonly associated with the action of aiming a weapon, rather than some metaphorical aim.




    How to correctly take aim at your target (when firing a semiautomatic rifle).







    share|improve this answer















    Actually, no qualifier is needed. The expression:




    How to aim a [pistol/rifle/weapon/etc]




    is perfectly natural (example). By default, when you instruct someone how to do something, it's assumed you are telling them how to do it correctly.



    However, if you want to emphasize that there is a correct method and and an incorrect method you could say something like:




    How to correctly aim [a weapon].




    As SamBC mentions, you can substitute various synonyms for "correctly": properly, accurately, appropriately, effectively, etc. You can also suggest you're teaching a particular technique: quickly, smoothly, steadily, etc. Example:




    How to safely and accurately aim and fire a fully automatic weapon.




    Also, by default, when you "aim" a weapon it's assumed to be at some target. Otherwise you're not really aiming it, but rather just pointing it in some vague direction.



    As an alternative, you can use the idiomatic expression "take aim", which is commonly associated with the action of aiming a weapon, rather than some metaphorical aim.




    How to correctly take aim at your target (when firing a semiautomatic rifle).








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 9 at 7:14









    V2Blast

    14317




    14317










    answered Feb 8 at 15:21









    AndrewAndrew

    67.9k676150




    67.9k676150













    • Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

      – SamBC
      Feb 8 at 16:59






    • 1





      @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

      – Andrew
      Feb 8 at 18:42





















    • Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

      – SamBC
      Feb 8 at 16:59






    • 1





      @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

      – Andrew
      Feb 8 at 18:42



















    Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

    – SamBC
    Feb 8 at 16:59





    Now I'm kicking myself for not thinking of the "no adverb" case...

    – SamBC
    Feb 8 at 16:59




    1




    1





    @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

    – Andrew
    Feb 8 at 18:42







    @SamBC No particular genius insight on my part -- I just Googled "how to aim ..." and picked the first auto-suggestion ("how to aim a shotgun") . :)

    – Andrew
    Feb 8 at 18:42













    1














    Idiomatically, the phrase to aim true might work. "True" here is in the sense of "straight, accurate, and without deviation", rather than the more common sense of "a statement agreeing with the facts". As an example, we have the headline How to Aim True at the F-class World Championships.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Idiomatically, the phrase to aim true might work. "True" here is in the sense of "straight, accurate, and without deviation", rather than the more common sense of "a statement agreeing with the facts". As an example, we have the headline How to Aim True at the F-class World Championships.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Idiomatically, the phrase to aim true might work. "True" here is in the sense of "straight, accurate, and without deviation", rather than the more common sense of "a statement agreeing with the facts". As an example, we have the headline How to Aim True at the F-class World Championships.






        share|improve this answer













        Idiomatically, the phrase to aim true might work. "True" here is in the sense of "straight, accurate, and without deviation", rather than the more common sense of "a statement agreeing with the facts". As an example, we have the headline How to Aim True at the F-class World Championships.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 8 at 17:00









        Michael SeifertMichael Seifert

        1513




        1513






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195871%2fhow-to-say-how-to-aim-well-right-correctly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?