Why there's no solution of closed form for the transcendental equations?
$begingroup$
I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
$$
int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
$$
can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
$$
int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
$$
can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
$$
int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
$$
can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
I just saw this question and I saw this kind of question in MSE a lot before. Also, the answers are always same: such equations can't be solved as a closed form in general, and we can only find its numerical solution. I also believe this, but why? There are some similar questions in integral, and I know that can be answered by Liouville's theorem, which proves that integrals such as
$$
int e^{x^{2}}dx, quad int frac{sin x}{x} dx, quad int sqrt{1-x^{4}}dx, quad intfrac{1}{log x}dx
$$
can't be solved in terms of elementary functions (that can be expressed as polynomials, trigonometry functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and their composition and $n$-th root).
Do we have a similar theorem for equations such as $e^{x}(x^{2}+3x+1) = 5sin (log x)$? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra
abstract-algebra
asked Nov 24 '18 at 3:09
Seewoo LeeSeewoo Lee
6,267826
6,267826
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011127%2fwhy-theres-no-solution-of-closed-form-for-the-transcendental-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011127%2fwhy-theres-no-solution-of-closed-form-for-the-transcendental-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown