Relation between trace of matrix $A^*A$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
Is there any relation between $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ and invertibility of the matrix $A$? What information about the matrix $A$ does $A^*A$ gives ?
I was confused about this when I came across the following statements:
Is it true that :
- If $A$ is invertible, then $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)$ is non zero.
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|<n^2$, then $|a_{ij}|<1$ for some $i,j$
- If $|mathrm{tr}(A^*A)|=0$, then $A$ is a zero matrix.
Can someone help me with the answer? Thank you in advance.
linear-algebra trace
linear-algebra trace
edited Nov 19 at 13:48
Jean-Claude Arbaut
14.7k63363
14.7k63363
asked Nov 19 at 13:31
math math
84
84
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45
add a comment |
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
3
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
Let $A in mathbb{C}^{n times n}$ be a complex square matrix.
Since for a complex number $z = x + iy$ we have
$$
z^* z = (x - iy)(x + iy) = x^2 + y^2 = |z|^2,
quad text{where } |z| := sqrt{x^2 + y^2}
$$
Now we have
$$
A^* A =
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1}^* & ldots & a_{n,1}^* \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{1,n}^* & ldots & a_{n,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
begin{pmatrix}
a_{1,1} & ldots & a_{1,n} \
vdots & ddots & vdots \
a_{n,1} & ldots & a_{n,n}
end{pmatrix}
= begin{pmatrix}
sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,1} a_{i,1}^* & & ast \
& ddots & \
ast & & sum_{i = 1}^{n} a_{i,n} a_{i,n}^*
end{pmatrix}
$$
therefore we have $operatorname{tr}(A^* A) = sum_{i,j=1}^{n} |a_{i,j}|^2$
- Let let $operatorname{tr}(A^*A) = 0$ then $|a_{i,j}|=0$ for all so the $A$ is the zero matrix, so $det(A)=0$, so it's not invertible, proving (1) by contraposition.
- From the above sum formula for the trace, since all summands are positive, when the sum is smaller than $n^2$, which is the number of summands, one of the summands has to be smaller than 1.
- Proven in (1).
edited Nov 19 at 14:38
answered Nov 19 at 14:14
Viktor Glombik
500421
500421
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004936%2frelation-between-trace-of-matrix-aa-and-invertibility-of-the-matrix-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is $A^*$ in context? Complex conjugate of $A$? Conjugate-transpose of $A$?
– Richard Martin
Nov 19 at 13:43
@RichardMartin Conjugate transpose
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:44
3
Hint: $mathrm{tr}(A^*A)=sum_{i,j} |a_{ij}|^2$. @RichardMartin No, it's not the "sum of squares", there is a modulus.
– Jean-Claude Arbaut
Nov 19 at 13:45