Opposite of “Rarer for younger, yet also the opposite”
Inspired by this puzzle
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
riddle word family
add a comment |
Inspired by this puzzle
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
riddle word family
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23
add a comment |
Inspired by this puzzle
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
riddle word family
Inspired by this puzzle
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
riddle word family
riddle word family
edited Jan 4 at 20:03
JonMark Perry
17.9k63786
17.9k63786
asked Jan 4 at 19:56
AcccumulationAcccumulation
387110
387110
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23
add a comment |
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
I believe the answer is:
Junior
This is because:
While Junior may be a nickname for anyone young, it is a generational title that is more commonly bestowed upon the eldest child. Thus, it is more likely for (e.g.) Fred Senior (the father) to have his firstborn son named Fred Junior, and any other sons named 'not-Fred' than for the 'Junior' to be bestowed upon a younger son.
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
I believe the word is
Baby -- the younger someone is the more likely they are to be called baby
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
But if you take two random siblings, the older one is likely to start dating sooner than the younger. A common term of endearment for a significant other is Baby. So the older sibling would be more likely to be called baby than their younger sibling... assuming neither of them are actual babies...
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
add a comment |
That could be...
Heir (or next in line, etc)
Because obviously...
Given two siblings, the older one is more likely to be the heir. But the older he/she is, the more likely it is that their predecessor has already passed away, in which case they have already inherited whatever title or property they had to, and (usually) are not called "heir" anymore.
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
A child
I often refer to very young people.
Children are very young.
In fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
Again, children are very young.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
If you pick two random siblings, the younger one could be a baby and the older one could still be a child
I thought about this a million times and another answer could be:
A teen
Although I doubt I'm right. :D
add a comment |
Perhaps
Sibling
Because
Children are often referred to as sibling or brother or sister. As in "he is so and so's sibling". When you get older you are referred to that less commonly (often defined by other relationships). However, a first child is not a sibling until a second one gets born, so when still young there's a higher chance that they don't have younger siblings.
add a comment |
I think following can be answer for:
" I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me"
Bachelor
Because some older persons calls themselves by this status to claim that they are younger!
"However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me."
Obviously older sibling will get this status earlier
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78127%2fopposite-of-rarer-for-younger-yet-also-the-opposite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I believe the answer is:
Junior
This is because:
While Junior may be a nickname for anyone young, it is a generational title that is more commonly bestowed upon the eldest child. Thus, it is more likely for (e.g.) Fred Senior (the father) to have his firstborn son named Fred Junior, and any other sons named 'not-Fred' than for the 'Junior' to be bestowed upon a younger son.
add a comment |
I believe the answer is:
Junior
This is because:
While Junior may be a nickname for anyone young, it is a generational title that is more commonly bestowed upon the eldest child. Thus, it is more likely for (e.g.) Fred Senior (the father) to have his firstborn son named Fred Junior, and any other sons named 'not-Fred' than for the 'Junior' to be bestowed upon a younger son.
add a comment |
I believe the answer is:
Junior
This is because:
While Junior may be a nickname for anyone young, it is a generational title that is more commonly bestowed upon the eldest child. Thus, it is more likely for (e.g.) Fred Senior (the father) to have his firstborn son named Fred Junior, and any other sons named 'not-Fred' than for the 'Junior' to be bestowed upon a younger son.
I believe the answer is:
Junior
This is because:
While Junior may be a nickname for anyone young, it is a generational title that is more commonly bestowed upon the eldest child. Thus, it is more likely for (e.g.) Fred Senior (the father) to have his firstborn son named Fred Junior, and any other sons named 'not-Fred' than for the 'Junior' to be bestowed upon a younger son.
answered Jan 5 at 4:31
VanVan
2163
2163
add a comment |
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
I believe the word is
Baby -- the younger someone is the more likely they are to be called baby
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
But if you take two random siblings, the older one is likely to start dating sooner than the younger. A common term of endearment for a significant other is Baby. So the older sibling would be more likely to be called baby than their younger sibling... assuming neither of them are actual babies...
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
I believe the word is
Baby -- the younger someone is the more likely they are to be called baby
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
But if you take two random siblings, the older one is likely to start dating sooner than the younger. A common term of endearment for a significant other is Baby. So the older sibling would be more likely to be called baby than their younger sibling... assuming neither of them are actual babies...
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
I believe the word is
Baby -- the younger someone is the more likely they are to be called baby
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
But if you take two random siblings, the older one is likely to start dating sooner than the younger. A common term of endearment for a significant other is Baby. So the older sibling would be more likely to be called baby than their younger sibling... assuming neither of them are actual babies...
I am a common word that refers to a person.
I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
I believe the word is
Baby -- the younger someone is the more likely they are to be called baby
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
But if you take two random siblings, the older one is likely to start dating sooner than the younger. A common term of endearment for a significant other is Baby. So the older sibling would be more likely to be called baby than their younger sibling... assuming neither of them are actual babies...
answered Jan 4 at 20:44
grinchgrinch
427310
427310
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
add a comment |
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
Or the term "sweetie". Mothers tend to call their child sweetie, but an older sibling's boyfriend/girlfriend could call them sweetie as well.
– Sweet_Cherry
Jan 4 at 20:58
add a comment |
That could be...
Heir (or next in line, etc)
Because obviously...
Given two siblings, the older one is more likely to be the heir. But the older he/she is, the more likely it is that their predecessor has already passed away, in which case they have already inherited whatever title or property they had to, and (usually) are not called "heir" anymore.
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
add a comment |
That could be...
Heir (or next in line, etc)
Because obviously...
Given two siblings, the older one is more likely to be the heir. But the older he/she is, the more likely it is that their predecessor has already passed away, in which case they have already inherited whatever title or property they had to, and (usually) are not called "heir" anymore.
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
add a comment |
That could be...
Heir (or next in line, etc)
Because obviously...
Given two siblings, the older one is more likely to be the heir. But the older he/she is, the more likely it is that their predecessor has already passed away, in which case they have already inherited whatever title or property they had to, and (usually) are not called "heir" anymore.
That could be...
Heir (or next in line, etc)
Because obviously...
Given two siblings, the older one is more likely to be the heir. But the older he/she is, the more likely it is that their predecessor has already passed away, in which case they have already inherited whatever title or property they had to, and (usually) are not called "heir" anymore.
answered Jan 5 at 16:31
ablabl
2814
2814
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
add a comment |
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
Good answer, but I was thinking of Van's answer. It's more common (most people are referred to as it at some point in their lives).
– Acccumulation
Jan 7 at 20:41
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
A child
I often refer to very young people.
Children are very young.
In fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
Again, children are very young.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
If you pick two random siblings, the younger one could be a baby and the older one could still be a child
I thought about this a million times and another answer could be:
A teen
Although I doubt I'm right. :D
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
A child
I often refer to very young people.
Children are very young.
In fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
Again, children are very young.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
If you pick two random siblings, the younger one could be a baby and the older one could still be a child
I thought about this a million times and another answer could be:
A teen
Although I doubt I'm right. :D
add a comment |
I am a common word that refers to a person.
A child
I often refer to very young people.
Children are very young.
In fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
Again, children are very young.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
If you pick two random siblings, the younger one could be a baby and the older one could still be a child
I thought about this a million times and another answer could be:
A teen
Although I doubt I'm right. :D
I am a common word that refers to a person.
A child
I often refer to very young people.
Children are very young.
In fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me.
Again, children are very young.
However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me.
If you pick two random siblings, the younger one could be a baby and the older one could still be a child
I thought about this a million times and another answer could be:
A teen
Although I doubt I'm right. :D
answered Jan 4 at 20:31
Sweet_CherrySweet_Cherry
1337
1337
add a comment |
add a comment |
Perhaps
Sibling
Because
Children are often referred to as sibling or brother or sister. As in "he is so and so's sibling". When you get older you are referred to that less commonly (often defined by other relationships). However, a first child is not a sibling until a second one gets born, so when still young there's a higher chance that they don't have younger siblings.
add a comment |
Perhaps
Sibling
Because
Children are often referred to as sibling or brother or sister. As in "he is so and so's sibling". When you get older you are referred to that less commonly (often defined by other relationships). However, a first child is not a sibling until a second one gets born, so when still young there's a higher chance that they don't have younger siblings.
add a comment |
Perhaps
Sibling
Because
Children are often referred to as sibling or brother or sister. As in "he is so and so's sibling". When you get older you are referred to that less commonly (often defined by other relationships). However, a first child is not a sibling until a second one gets born, so when still young there's a higher chance that they don't have younger siblings.
Perhaps
Sibling
Because
Children are often referred to as sibling or brother or sister. As in "he is so and so's sibling". When you get older you are referred to that less commonly (often defined by other relationships). However, a first child is not a sibling until a second one gets born, so when still young there's a higher chance that they don't have younger siblings.
answered Jan 5 at 2:33
Dr XorileDr Xorile
11.7k22466
11.7k22466
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think following can be answer for:
" I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me"
Bachelor
Because some older persons calls themselves by this status to claim that they are younger!
"However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me."
Obviously older sibling will get this status earlier
add a comment |
I think following can be answer for:
" I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me"
Bachelor
Because some older persons calls themselves by this status to claim that they are younger!
"However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me."
Obviously older sibling will get this status earlier
add a comment |
I think following can be answer for:
" I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me"
Bachelor
Because some older persons calls themselves by this status to claim that they are younger!
"However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me."
Obviously older sibling will get this status earlier
I think following can be answer for:
" I often refer to very young people – in fact, the younger a person is, the more likely they are to be called me"
Bachelor
Because some older persons calls themselves by this status to claim that they are younger!
"However, if you pick two random siblings, the older of them is more likely than the younger one to be called me."
Obviously older sibling will get this status earlier
answered Jan 5 at 14:06
PandyaPandya
1011
1011
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78127%2fopposite-of-rarer-for-younger-yet-also-the-opposite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Any update or hint on this?
– grinch
Jan 7 at 15:23