Projective cover of modules












0












$begingroup$


Give me a hand please, how can i prove this sentence.



"Show $mathbb{Z}_{2}$ doesn't have projective cover as $mathbb{Z}$-module."






abstract-algebra modules projective-module







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried so far?
    $endgroup$
    – Y. Forman
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:42
















0












$begingroup$


Give me a hand please, how can i prove this sentence.



"Show $mathbb{Z}_{2}$ doesn't have projective cover as $mathbb{Z}$-module."






abstract-algebra modules projective-module







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried so far?
    $endgroup$
    – Y. Forman
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:42














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Give me a hand please, how can i prove this sentence.



"Show $mathbb{Z}_{2}$ doesn't have projective cover as $mathbb{Z}$-module."






abstract-algebra modules projective-module







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Give me a hand please, how can i prove this sentence.



"Show $mathbb{Z}_{2}$ doesn't have projective cover as $mathbb{Z}$-module."






abstract-algebra modules projective-module




abstract-algebra modules projective-module






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 28 '18 at 0:40









Davis WeDavis We

705




705












  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried so far?
    $endgroup$
    – Y. Forman
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:42


















  • $begingroup$
    What have you tried so far?
    $endgroup$
    – Y. Forman
    Nov 28 '18 at 0:42
















$begingroup$
What have you tried so far?
$endgroup$
– Y. Forman
Nov 28 '18 at 0:42




$begingroup$
What have you tried so far?
$endgroup$
– Y. Forman
Nov 28 '18 at 0:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I think it's helpful to use the fundamental lemma for projective covers.



Suppose $pcolon Ptomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover. There is also the canonical surjection $pi:mathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ given by reduction mod $2$. Since $mathbb{Z}$ is projective, the Fundamental Lemma of Projective Covers gives that there exists a decomposition $mathbb{Z}=P'oplus P''$, where $Psimeq P'$, $pi(P'')=0$, and the restriction $pi|_{P'}colon P'tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover.




But $mathbb{Z}$ is indecomposable, so in any case $mathbb{Z}=P'$. Hence one would get $picolonmathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover, but this is a contradiction since $kerpi=2mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$, since $2mathbb{Z}+3mathbb{Z}=mathbb{Z}$, for instance.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, thank's for ask :)
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
    $endgroup$
    – BWW
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:09













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016538%2fprojective-cover-of-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

I think it's helpful to use the fundamental lemma for projective covers.



Suppose $pcolon Ptomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover. There is also the canonical surjection $pi:mathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ given by reduction mod $2$. Since $mathbb{Z}$ is projective, the Fundamental Lemma of Projective Covers gives that there exists a decomposition $mathbb{Z}=P'oplus P''$, where $Psimeq P'$, $pi(P'')=0$, and the restriction $pi|_{P'}colon P'tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover.




But $mathbb{Z}$ is indecomposable, so in any case $mathbb{Z}=P'$. Hence one would get $picolonmathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover, but this is a contradiction since $kerpi=2mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$, since $2mathbb{Z}+3mathbb{Z}=mathbb{Z}$, for instance.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, thank's for ask :)
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
    $endgroup$
    – BWW
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:09


















1












$begingroup$

I think it's helpful to use the fundamental lemma for projective covers.



Suppose $pcolon Ptomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover. There is also the canonical surjection $pi:mathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ given by reduction mod $2$. Since $mathbb{Z}$ is projective, the Fundamental Lemma of Projective Covers gives that there exists a decomposition $mathbb{Z}=P'oplus P''$, where $Psimeq P'$, $pi(P'')=0$, and the restriction $pi|_{P'}colon P'tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover.




But $mathbb{Z}$ is indecomposable, so in any case $mathbb{Z}=P'$. Hence one would get $picolonmathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover, but this is a contradiction since $kerpi=2mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$, since $2mathbb{Z}+3mathbb{Z}=mathbb{Z}$, for instance.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, thank's for ask :)
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
    $endgroup$
    – BWW
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:09
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

I think it's helpful to use the fundamental lemma for projective covers.



Suppose $pcolon Ptomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover. There is also the canonical surjection $pi:mathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ given by reduction mod $2$. Since $mathbb{Z}$ is projective, the Fundamental Lemma of Projective Covers gives that there exists a decomposition $mathbb{Z}=P'oplus P''$, where $Psimeq P'$, $pi(P'')=0$, and the restriction $pi|_{P'}colon P'tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover.




But $mathbb{Z}$ is indecomposable, so in any case $mathbb{Z}=P'$. Hence one would get $picolonmathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover, but this is a contradiction since $kerpi=2mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$, since $2mathbb{Z}+3mathbb{Z}=mathbb{Z}$, for instance.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I think it's helpful to use the fundamental lemma for projective covers.



Suppose $pcolon Ptomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover. There is also the canonical surjection $pi:mathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ given by reduction mod $2$. Since $mathbb{Z}$ is projective, the Fundamental Lemma of Projective Covers gives that there exists a decomposition $mathbb{Z}=P'oplus P''$, where $Psimeq P'$, $pi(P'')=0$, and the restriction $pi|_{P'}colon P'tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover.




But $mathbb{Z}$ is indecomposable, so in any case $mathbb{Z}=P'$. Hence one would get $picolonmathbb{Z}tomathbb{Z}_2$ is a projective cover, but this is a contradiction since $kerpi=2mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$, since $2mathbb{Z}+3mathbb{Z}=mathbb{Z}$, for instance.








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 28 '18 at 1:32









BWWBWW

9,23622238




9,23622238












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, thank's for ask :)
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
    $endgroup$
    – BWW
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:09




















  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, thank's for ask :)
    $endgroup$
    – Davis We
    Nov 29 '18 at 3:50










  • $begingroup$
    @Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
    $endgroup$
    – BWW
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:09


















$begingroup$
What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
$endgroup$
– Davis We
Nov 29 '18 at 3:50




$begingroup$
What do you mean " $2 mathbb{Z}$ is not superfluous in $mathbb{Z}$ "?
$endgroup$
– Davis We
Nov 29 '18 at 3:50












$begingroup$
By the way, thank's for ask :)
$endgroup$
– Davis We
Nov 29 '18 at 3:50




$begingroup$
By the way, thank's for ask :)
$endgroup$
– Davis We
Nov 29 '18 at 3:50












$begingroup$
@Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
$endgroup$
– BWW
Nov 29 '18 at 4:09






$begingroup$
@Davis In a category of modules, $(P,p)$ is a projective cover when $p$ is a superfluous epimorphism, meaning that $ker p$ is a superfluous submodule of $P$. Generally, $N$ is a superfluous submodule of $M$ if for any submodule $L$ of $M$ such that $N+L=M$, necessarily $L=M$.
$endgroup$
– BWW
Nov 29 '18 at 4:09




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016538%2fprojective-cover-of-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

Image
0 I just uploaded a new plugin to my wordpress site and I got this warning: mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924 Usually if I have a problem, I can find answers on google but this one seems pretty particular and I'm not finding any info on it except for this forum. I'm not terribly techie but if someone can tell me how to read this and how to change it I can follow directions pretty well. Thanks All! PS If I don't have the proper tags here could someone add the appropriate tags? php mysql wordpress share | improve this question asked Nov 16 '18 at 20:41 ...
Read more

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question ...
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"...
Read more