$mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{2}^{2}X_{2}|x_{1})$ with $Xsim N(0,1)$ and $Ysim Pois(1)$ both independent
Let ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables. Furthermore, $Y$ is a Poisson distributed random variable with parameter $lambda=1$, i.e., $mathbb{P}(Y=n)=frac{e^{-1}}{n!}, n=0,1,2,...$, and Y is independent of the sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$. Compute the following (conditional) expectation
$$
mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})
$$
probability normal-distribution poisson-distribution expected-value
add a comment |
Let ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables. Furthermore, $Y$ is a Poisson distributed random variable with parameter $lambda=1$, i.e., $mathbb{P}(Y=n)=frac{e^{-1}}{n!}, n=0,1,2,...$, and Y is independent of the sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$. Compute the following (conditional) expectation
$$
mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})
$$
probability normal-distribution poisson-distribution expected-value
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
1
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
1
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
Let ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables. Furthermore, $Y$ is a Poisson distributed random variable with parameter $lambda=1$, i.e., $mathbb{P}(Y=n)=frac{e^{-1}}{n!}, n=0,1,2,...$, and Y is independent of the sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$. Compute the following (conditional) expectation
$$
mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})
$$
probability normal-distribution poisson-distribution expected-value
Let ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent standard normal random variables. Furthermore, $Y$ is a Poisson distributed random variable with parameter $lambda=1$, i.e., $mathbb{P}(Y=n)=frac{e^{-1}}{n!}, n=0,1,2,...$, and Y is independent of the sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$. Compute the following (conditional) expectation
$$
mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})
$$
probability normal-distribution poisson-distribution expected-value
probability normal-distribution poisson-distribution expected-value
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:45
asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:42
R.Sluij
236
236
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
1
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
1
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
1
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
1
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
1
1
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
1
1
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I would suggest the following:
$$mathbb{E}left[ X_{Y+1} X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E} left[ X_2X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] + mathbb{P} (Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}left[X_3X_1^2X_2 | X_1right]\ = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E}[X_2^2] X_1^2 + mathbb{P}(Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}[X_2]^2 cdot X_1^2
$$
And now you simply use the distribution of $Y$ and $X_i$...
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001042%2fmathbbex-y1x-22x-2x-1-with-x-sim-n0-1-and-y-sim-pois1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would suggest the following:
$$mathbb{E}left[ X_{Y+1} X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E} left[ X_2X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] + mathbb{P} (Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}left[X_3X_1^2X_2 | X_1right]\ = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E}[X_2^2] X_1^2 + mathbb{P}(Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}[X_2]^2 cdot X_1^2
$$
And now you simply use the distribution of $Y$ and $X_i$...
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
I would suggest the following:
$$mathbb{E}left[ X_{Y+1} X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E} left[ X_2X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] + mathbb{P} (Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}left[X_3X_1^2X_2 | X_1right]\ = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E}[X_2^2] X_1^2 + mathbb{P}(Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}[X_2]^2 cdot X_1^2
$$
And now you simply use the distribution of $Y$ and $X_i$...
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
I would suggest the following:
$$mathbb{E}left[ X_{Y+1} X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E} left[ X_2X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] + mathbb{P} (Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}left[X_3X_1^2X_2 | X_1right]\ = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E}[X_2^2] X_1^2 + mathbb{P}(Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}[X_2]^2 cdot X_1^2
$$
And now you simply use the distribution of $Y$ and $X_i$...
I would suggest the following:
$$mathbb{E}left[ X_{Y+1} X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E} left[ X_2X_1^2 X_2 | X_1 right] + mathbb{P} (Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}left[X_3X_1^2X_2 | X_1right]\ = mathbb{P}(Y=1) mathbb{E}[X_2^2] X_1^2 + mathbb{P}(Ygeq 2) mathbb{E}[X_2]^2 cdot X_1^2
$$
And now you simply use the distribution of $Y$ and $X_i$...
answered Nov 21 '18 at 13:04
cptflint
208
208
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
Thanks, however that gives the same value
– R.Sluij
Nov 22 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001042%2fmathbbex-y1x-22x-2x-1-with-x-sim-n0-1-and-y-sim-pois1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can your show your attempt?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 11:55
Knowing, $X_{1}$ it is possible to take out $X_{1}^{2}$. Using the property of conditional expectation, we can condition on Y, which gives $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}mathbb{E}(mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1}|Y))$. Now, we are able to use the distribution of $Y$ and the fact that $Y$ is independent of sequence ${X_{i},iinmathbb{N}}$, since for $Yneq1$ with probability $1-e^{-1}$ we have $mathbb{E}(X_{2}X_{Y+1})=0$. We may conclude that $mathbb{E}(X_{Y+1}X_{1}^{2}X_{2}|X_{1})=X_{1}^{2}(e^{-1}(1)+(1-e^{-1})(0))$, this was my attempt.
– R.Sluij
Nov 16 '18 at 12:05
1
Congratulations! You have answered the question yourselves.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 16 '18 at 12:12
1
The $lambda$ in Poisson distribution is supposed to be positive. It should be $lambda=1$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 16 '18 at 12:14
Thank you both!
– R.Sluij
Nov 21 '18 at 12:46