A result concluded by Dirichlet's theorem
We know from the Prime Number Theorem (PNT) that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N Lambda(n)= 1+ o(1),$$
where $Lambda$ is von Mangoldt function. Now consider $ W in mathbb{N}$ and define
$$tilde{Lambda} (n) :=
frac{Phi(W)}{W} ln(Wn+1) $$
if $Wn+1$ is prime and $0$ otherwise.$Phi$ is the Euler function. I saw somewhere that by Dirichlet's famous theorem about primes in arithmetic progressions and the PNT, it can be proved that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N tildeLambda(n)= 1+ o(1).$$
Would anyone please introduce me some references to read the proof?
number-theory prime-numbers fourier-analysis analytic-number-theory
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
add a comment |
We know from the Prime Number Theorem (PNT) that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N Lambda(n)= 1+ o(1),$$
where $Lambda$ is von Mangoldt function. Now consider $ W in mathbb{N}$ and define
$$tilde{Lambda} (n) :=
frac{Phi(W)}{W} ln(Wn+1) $$
if $Wn+1$ is prime and $0$ otherwise.$Phi$ is the Euler function. I saw somewhere that by Dirichlet's famous theorem about primes in arithmetic progressions and the PNT, it can be proved that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N tildeLambda(n)= 1+ o(1).$$
Would anyone please introduce me some references to read the proof?
number-theory prime-numbers fourier-analysis analytic-number-theory
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
We know from the Prime Number Theorem (PNT) that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N Lambda(n)= 1+ o(1),$$
where $Lambda$ is von Mangoldt function. Now consider $ W in mathbb{N}$ and define
$$tilde{Lambda} (n) :=
frac{Phi(W)}{W} ln(Wn+1) $$
if $Wn+1$ is prime and $0$ otherwise.$Phi$ is the Euler function. I saw somewhere that by Dirichlet's famous theorem about primes in arithmetic progressions and the PNT, it can be proved that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N tildeLambda(n)= 1+ o(1).$$
Would anyone please introduce me some references to read the proof?
number-theory prime-numbers fourier-analysis analytic-number-theory
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
We know from the Prime Number Theorem (PNT) that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N Lambda(n)= 1+ o(1),$$
where $Lambda$ is von Mangoldt function. Now consider $ W in mathbb{N}$ and define
$$tilde{Lambda} (n) :=
frac{Phi(W)}{W} ln(Wn+1) $$
if $Wn+1$ is prime and $0$ otherwise.$Phi$ is the Euler function. I saw somewhere that by Dirichlet's famous theorem about primes in arithmetic progressions and the PNT, it can be proved that
$$frac{1}{N}sum_{n=1}^N tildeLambda(n)= 1+ o(1).$$
Would anyone please introduce me some references to read the proof?
number-theory prime-numbers fourier-analysis analytic-number-theory
number-theory prime-numbers fourier-analysis analytic-number-theory
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:09
amWhy
192k28224439
192k28224439
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
asked Jul 11 '18 at 20:16
user115608
1,2531026
1,2531026
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2848016%2fa-result-concluded-by-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2848016%2fa-result-concluded-by-dirichlets-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It is not so much a consequence of Dirichlet's theorem and PNT, but the proof comes out of combining the proof of PNT with the $L$-functions and characters that Dirichlet had already used in his proof about 60 years earlier. The technical details of this combination were worked out by de la Vallée-Poussin shortly after the proof of PNT. You'll want to search for "Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions".
– Erick Wong
Jul 12 '18 at 23:27
@ErickWong Thanks.I searched but I found nothing. would you please help?
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 6:36
Did you sincerely find nothing? Literally searching for that exact phrase in Google results in at least 3 PDF proofs on the first page alone. One of them by Soprounov is particularly simple at only 3 pages long.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 7:04
@ErickWong yes I did. None of them was exactly the proof I want.
– user115608
Jul 13 '18 at 7:13
That is completely different from “I found nothing”, and completely different from your question which merely asks for references. If you can’t specify exactly what proof you want, no one can provide any references.
– Erick Wong
Jul 13 '18 at 20:07