Does the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature grant resistance against spells such as...











up vote
12
down vote

favorite












The Path of the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature (XGtE, p. 10) says:




While you’re raging, the first creature you hit with an attack on your turn becomes the target of the warriors, which hinder its attacks. Until the start of your next turn, [...] when the target hits a creature other than you with an attack, that creature has resistance to the damage dealt by the attack.




Let's say the barbarian hits a wizard, and after the wizard casts a fireball into the party (or even a toll the dead on an individual besides the barbarian).



Do the party members get resistance to the damage? Or because it specifies "attack", and a fireball (and toll the dead) is not described as an attack, do they take full damage?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Related: What counts as an attack?
    – Sdjz
    Dec 4 at 15:39















up vote
12
down vote

favorite












The Path of the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature (XGtE, p. 10) says:




While you’re raging, the first creature you hit with an attack on your turn becomes the target of the warriors, which hinder its attacks. Until the start of your next turn, [...] when the target hits a creature other than you with an attack, that creature has resistance to the damage dealt by the attack.




Let's say the barbarian hits a wizard, and after the wizard casts a fireball into the party (or even a toll the dead on an individual besides the barbarian).



Do the party members get resistance to the damage? Or because it specifies "attack", and a fireball (and toll the dead) is not described as an attack, do they take full damage?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Related: What counts as an attack?
    – Sdjz
    Dec 4 at 15:39













up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











The Path of the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature (XGtE, p. 10) says:




While you’re raging, the first creature you hit with an attack on your turn becomes the target of the warriors, which hinder its attacks. Until the start of your next turn, [...] when the target hits a creature other than you with an attack, that creature has resistance to the damage dealt by the attack.




Let's say the barbarian hits a wizard, and after the wizard casts a fireball into the party (or even a toll the dead on an individual besides the barbarian).



Do the party members get resistance to the damage? Or because it specifies "attack", and a fireball (and toll the dead) is not described as an attack, do they take full damage?










share|improve this question















The Path of the Ancestral Guardian barbarian's Ancestral Protectors feature (XGtE, p. 10) says:




While you’re raging, the first creature you hit with an attack on your turn becomes the target of the warriors, which hinder its attacks. Until the start of your next turn, [...] when the target hits a creature other than you with an attack, that creature has resistance to the damage dealt by the attack.




Let's say the barbarian hits a wizard, and after the wizard casts a fireball into the party (or even a toll the dead on an individual besides the barbarian).



Do the party members get resistance to the damage? Or because it specifies "attack", and a fireball (and toll the dead) is not described as an attack, do they take full damage?







dnd-5e spells class-feature barbarian damage-resistance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 4 at 22:04









V2Blast

18.7k251116




18.7k251116










asked Dec 4 at 15:33









James

633211




633211








  • 1




    Related: What counts as an attack?
    – Sdjz
    Dec 4 at 15:39














  • 1




    Related: What counts as an attack?
    – Sdjz
    Dec 4 at 15:39








1




1




Related: What counts as an attack?
– Sdjz
Dec 4 at 15:39




Related: What counts as an attack?
– Sdjz
Dec 4 at 15:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










The party takes full damage from both spells



Unless the spell says you are making an attack roll or labels itself an attack you are not attacking.




If there’s ever any question whether something you’re doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you’re making an attack roll, you’re making an attack. (PHB 194)




Fireball says:




Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw.




This is a saving throw made by the affected creatures, not an attack roll. Thus it is not an attack.



The same is true of toll the dead which says:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d8 necrotic damage.




Ancestral Protectors specifically requires an attack:




When the target hits a creature other than you with an attack...




Thus, the party will get no protection from a fireball or toll the dead since they are not attacks.






share|improve this answer























  • I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
    – MarkTO
    Dec 4 at 20:38






  • 5




    @MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 4 at 20:41








  • 1




    You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
    – Pyrotechnical
    Dec 4 at 23:27










  • @Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 5 at 15:21


















up vote
5
down vote













The fireball does not count as an attack because there is no attack roll; it simply calls for a (Dexterity) saving throw. The same is true for toll the dead:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw




Therefore, the Barbarian's ability does not apply.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
    – GreySage
    Dec 4 at 17:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136766%2fdoes-the-ancestral-guardian-barbarians-ancestral-protectors-feature-grant-resis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
18
down vote



accepted










The party takes full damage from both spells



Unless the spell says you are making an attack roll or labels itself an attack you are not attacking.




If there’s ever any question whether something you’re doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you’re making an attack roll, you’re making an attack. (PHB 194)




Fireball says:




Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw.




This is a saving throw made by the affected creatures, not an attack roll. Thus it is not an attack.



The same is true of toll the dead which says:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d8 necrotic damage.




Ancestral Protectors specifically requires an attack:




When the target hits a creature other than you with an attack...




Thus, the party will get no protection from a fireball or toll the dead since they are not attacks.






share|improve this answer























  • I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
    – MarkTO
    Dec 4 at 20:38






  • 5




    @MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 4 at 20:41








  • 1




    You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
    – Pyrotechnical
    Dec 4 at 23:27










  • @Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 5 at 15:21















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










The party takes full damage from both spells



Unless the spell says you are making an attack roll or labels itself an attack you are not attacking.




If there’s ever any question whether something you’re doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you’re making an attack roll, you’re making an attack. (PHB 194)




Fireball says:




Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw.




This is a saving throw made by the affected creatures, not an attack roll. Thus it is not an attack.



The same is true of toll the dead which says:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d8 necrotic damage.




Ancestral Protectors specifically requires an attack:




When the target hits a creature other than you with an attack...




Thus, the party will get no protection from a fireball or toll the dead since they are not attacks.






share|improve this answer























  • I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
    – MarkTO
    Dec 4 at 20:38






  • 5




    @MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 4 at 20:41








  • 1




    You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
    – Pyrotechnical
    Dec 4 at 23:27










  • @Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 5 at 15:21













up vote
18
down vote



accepted







up vote
18
down vote



accepted






The party takes full damage from both spells



Unless the spell says you are making an attack roll or labels itself an attack you are not attacking.




If there’s ever any question whether something you’re doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you’re making an attack roll, you’re making an attack. (PHB 194)




Fireball says:




Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw.




This is a saving throw made by the affected creatures, not an attack roll. Thus it is not an attack.



The same is true of toll the dead which says:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d8 necrotic damage.




Ancestral Protectors specifically requires an attack:




When the target hits a creature other than you with an attack...




Thus, the party will get no protection from a fireball or toll the dead since they are not attacks.






share|improve this answer














The party takes full damage from both spells



Unless the spell says you are making an attack roll or labels itself an attack you are not attacking.




If there’s ever any question whether something you’re doing counts as an attack, the rule is simple: if you’re making an attack roll, you’re making an attack. (PHB 194)




Fireball says:




Each creature in a 20-foot-radius sphere centered on that point must make a Dexterity saving throw.




This is a saving throw made by the affected creatures, not an attack roll. Thus it is not an attack.



The same is true of toll the dead which says:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d8 necrotic damage.




Ancestral Protectors specifically requires an attack:




When the target hits a creature other than you with an attack...




Thus, the party will get no protection from a fireball or toll the dead since they are not attacks.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 5 at 15:20

























answered Dec 4 at 16:21









Rubiksmoose

46.2k6232353




46.2k6232353












  • I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
    – MarkTO
    Dec 4 at 20:38






  • 5




    @MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 4 at 20:41








  • 1




    You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
    – Pyrotechnical
    Dec 4 at 23:27










  • @Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 5 at 15:21


















  • I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
    – MarkTO
    Dec 4 at 20:38






  • 5




    @MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 4 at 20:41








  • 1




    You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
    – Pyrotechnical
    Dec 4 at 23:27










  • @Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Dec 5 at 15:21
















I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
– MarkTO
Dec 4 at 20:38




I look forward to a player fireballing a busy marketplace then arguing it wasn't 'an attack' on the marketplace. DnD specificity leads to weirdness.
– MarkTO
Dec 4 at 20:38




5




5




@MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
– Rubiksmoose
Dec 4 at 20:41






@MarkTO Good luck trying to convince the guards based on game meta logic! Murderhobo: "Well you see I didn't roll an attack roll, so legally I did not attack and murder those people" Guard: "A what roll?" [Puts handcuffs on muderhobo]
– Rubiksmoose
Dec 4 at 20:41






1




1




You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
– Pyrotechnical
Dec 4 at 23:27




You may want to improve this answer by citing the relevant portions of the PHB that specify what is and isn't an attack as well as clarify the situation were the Wizard to use a spell that did have an attack roll.
– Pyrotechnical
Dec 4 at 23:27












@Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
– Rubiksmoose
Dec 5 at 15:21




@Pyrotechnical the first part is done. Do you really think the part with spells with attack rolls is necessary? It doesn't seem to me that is the area OP is confused about, but maybe I'm missing something.
– Rubiksmoose
Dec 5 at 15:21












up vote
5
down vote













The fireball does not count as an attack because there is no attack roll; it simply calls for a (Dexterity) saving throw. The same is true for toll the dead:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw




Therefore, the Barbarian's ability does not apply.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
    – GreySage
    Dec 4 at 17:59















up vote
5
down vote













The fireball does not count as an attack because there is no attack roll; it simply calls for a (Dexterity) saving throw. The same is true for toll the dead:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw




Therefore, the Barbarian's ability does not apply.






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
    – GreySage
    Dec 4 at 17:59













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









The fireball does not count as an attack because there is no attack roll; it simply calls for a (Dexterity) saving throw. The same is true for toll the dead:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw




Therefore, the Barbarian's ability does not apply.






share|improve this answer














The fireball does not count as an attack because there is no attack roll; it simply calls for a (Dexterity) saving throw. The same is true for toll the dead:




The target must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw




Therefore, the Barbarian's ability does not apply.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 4 at 23:13









V2Blast

18.7k251116




18.7k251116










answered Dec 4 at 15:41









Destruktor

3,3211952




3,3211952








  • 3




    Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
    – GreySage
    Dec 4 at 17:59














  • 3




    Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
    – GreySage
    Dec 4 at 17:59








3




3




Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
– GreySage
Dec 4 at 17:59




Care to expand this to explain how toll the dead works too? I think you're right, but if you cover both cases it will be clearer.
– GreySage
Dec 4 at 17:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136766%2fdoes-the-ancestral-guardian-barbarians-ancestral-protectors-feature-grant-resis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?