If the closed unit ball of Banach space has at least one extreme point, must the Banach space the be a dual...












4














Let $X$ be a Banach space.
By Banach-Alaoglu and Krein-Milman Theorems, one can show that if $X$ is a dual space, then $X$ must have at least one extreme point of the closed unit ball.



I am interested in its converse.
More precisely,




Question: Let $X$ be a Banach space.
If the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least one extreme point, must $X$ be a dual space?




I feel that the statement above is negative.
However, I could not produce a counterexample.



In fact, the only Banach spaces which I know that are not dual spaces are $c_0$ and $C_0(mathbb{R})$ (the latter set is the collection of all real-valued continuous function vanishing at infinity) because both sets have no extreme point.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:11










  • I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:13






  • 4




    This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:20










  • @MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
    – Idonknow
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:42






  • 1




    @TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
    – Dirk Werner
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:04
















4














Let $X$ be a Banach space.
By Banach-Alaoglu and Krein-Milman Theorems, one can show that if $X$ is a dual space, then $X$ must have at least one extreme point of the closed unit ball.



I am interested in its converse.
More precisely,




Question: Let $X$ be a Banach space.
If the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least one extreme point, must $X$ be a dual space?




I feel that the statement above is negative.
However, I could not produce a counterexample.



In fact, the only Banach spaces which I know that are not dual spaces are $c_0$ and $C_0(mathbb{R})$ (the latter set is the collection of all real-valued continuous function vanishing at infinity) because both sets have no extreme point.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:11










  • I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:13






  • 4




    This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:20










  • @MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
    – Idonknow
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:42






  • 1




    @TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
    – Dirk Werner
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:04














4












4








4


2





Let $X$ be a Banach space.
By Banach-Alaoglu and Krein-Milman Theorems, one can show that if $X$ is a dual space, then $X$ must have at least one extreme point of the closed unit ball.



I am interested in its converse.
More precisely,




Question: Let $X$ be a Banach space.
If the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least one extreme point, must $X$ be a dual space?




I feel that the statement above is negative.
However, I could not produce a counterexample.



In fact, the only Banach spaces which I know that are not dual spaces are $c_0$ and $C_0(mathbb{R})$ (the latter set is the collection of all real-valued continuous function vanishing at infinity) because both sets have no extreme point.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $X$ be a Banach space.
By Banach-Alaoglu and Krein-Milman Theorems, one can show that if $X$ is a dual space, then $X$ must have at least one extreme point of the closed unit ball.



I am interested in its converse.
More precisely,




Question: Let $X$ be a Banach space.
If the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least one extreme point, must $X$ be a dual space?




I feel that the statement above is negative.
However, I could not produce a counterexample.



In fact, the only Banach spaces which I know that are not dual spaces are $c_0$ and $C_0(mathbb{R})$ (the latter set is the collection of all real-valued continuous function vanishing at infinity) because both sets have no extreme point.







fa.functional-analysis banach-spaces convexity duality extreme-points






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 23:09

























asked Dec 2 '18 at 7:06









Idonknow

213312




213312








  • 3




    When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:11










  • I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:13






  • 4




    This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:20










  • @MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
    – Idonknow
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:42






  • 1




    @TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
    – Dirk Werner
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:04














  • 3




    When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:11










  • I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:13






  • 4




    This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:20










  • @MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
    – Idonknow
    Dec 2 '18 at 7:42






  • 1




    @TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
    – Dirk Werner
    Dec 2 '18 at 22:04








3




3




When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:11




When you say that "$X$ has at least one extreme point" do you mean that the closed unit ball of $X$ has at least on extreme point?
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:11












I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:13




I have added the tag (extreme-points), since it seems to me a good fit to the question. There exists also (krein-milman-theorem) tag, but that one would probably be a stretch.
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:13




4




4




This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:20




This post on Mathematics site seems to be about the same question: Krein-Milman and dual spaces.
– Martin Sleziak
Dec 2 '18 at 7:20












@MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
– Idonknow
Dec 2 '18 at 7:42




@MartinSleziak Yes, I mean the closed unit ball of $X.$
– Idonknow
Dec 2 '18 at 7:42




1




1




@TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
– Dirk Werner
Dec 2 '18 at 22:04




@TarasBanakh: There are infinite compact $K$ for which $C(K)$ is a dual space: these are precisely the hyperstonean $K$, e.g., $betamathbb{N}$. (On the other hand there are non-dual $C(K)$ for which the unit ball is the norm-closed convex hull of its extreme points, e.g. $alphamathbb{N}$. These are precisely the totally disconected $K$.)
– Dirk Werner
Dec 2 '18 at 22:04










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8














Every separable Banach space $X$ can be equivalently renormed so that every point in the unit sphere is an extreme point: Take an injective bounded linear operator $T$ from $X$ into $ell_2$ and use $|x| := |x|_X + |Tx|_2$. Of course, there are many separable Banach spaces that are not isomorphic to a separable conjugate space, including (as Dirk pointed out) those that fail the Radon Nikodym property.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    7














    No. Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces, and set $Z=Xoplus Y$, with $||(x,y)||:=|x|+|y|$. Assume that $x$ is a extreme point of $X$ with $|x|=1$. Then $(x,0)$ becomes an extreme point of $Z$; indeed, if
    $$(x,0)=frac12(a,y)+frac12(b,z)$$
    for $(a,y),(b,z)$ in the unit ball of $Z$, we then have $a=x=b$, since $x$ is an extreme point, but then $1=|x|=|a|leq||(a,y)||leq 1$, so $y=0$, and analogously, $z=0$.



    So, $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$, is not a dual space, but its unit ball has extreme points.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
      – Idonknow
      Dec 2 '18 at 14:56






    • 1




      @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
      – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
      Dec 2 '18 at 16:03






    • 3




      @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
      – Dirk Werner
      Dec 2 '18 at 22:03










    • @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
      – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
      Dec 3 '18 at 3:01











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316701%2fif-the-closed-unit-ball-of-banach-space-has-at-least-one-extreme-point-must-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    Every separable Banach space $X$ can be equivalently renormed so that every point in the unit sphere is an extreme point: Take an injective bounded linear operator $T$ from $X$ into $ell_2$ and use $|x| := |x|_X + |Tx|_2$. Of course, there are many separable Banach spaces that are not isomorphic to a separable conjugate space, including (as Dirk pointed out) those that fail the Radon Nikodym property.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      8














      Every separable Banach space $X$ can be equivalently renormed so that every point in the unit sphere is an extreme point: Take an injective bounded linear operator $T$ from $X$ into $ell_2$ and use $|x| := |x|_X + |Tx|_2$. Of course, there are many separable Banach spaces that are not isomorphic to a separable conjugate space, including (as Dirk pointed out) those that fail the Radon Nikodym property.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        8












        8








        8






        Every separable Banach space $X$ can be equivalently renormed so that every point in the unit sphere is an extreme point: Take an injective bounded linear operator $T$ from $X$ into $ell_2$ and use $|x| := |x|_X + |Tx|_2$. Of course, there are many separable Banach spaces that are not isomorphic to a separable conjugate space, including (as Dirk pointed out) those that fail the Radon Nikodym property.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Every separable Banach space $X$ can be equivalently renormed so that every point in the unit sphere is an extreme point: Take an injective bounded linear operator $T$ from $X$ into $ell_2$ and use $|x| := |x|_X + |Tx|_2$. Of course, there are many separable Banach spaces that are not isomorphic to a separable conjugate space, including (as Dirk pointed out) those that fail the Radon Nikodym property.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:25









        Bill Johnson

        24.1k369116




        24.1k369116























            7














            No. Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces, and set $Z=Xoplus Y$, with $||(x,y)||:=|x|+|y|$. Assume that $x$ is a extreme point of $X$ with $|x|=1$. Then $(x,0)$ becomes an extreme point of $Z$; indeed, if
            $$(x,0)=frac12(a,y)+frac12(b,z)$$
            for $(a,y),(b,z)$ in the unit ball of $Z$, we then have $a=x=b$, since $x$ is an extreme point, but then $1=|x|=|a|leq||(a,y)||leq 1$, so $y=0$, and analogously, $z=0$.



            So, $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$, is not a dual space, but its unit ball has extreme points.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
              – Idonknow
              Dec 2 '18 at 14:56






            • 1




              @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 2 '18 at 16:03






            • 3




              @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
              – Dirk Werner
              Dec 2 '18 at 22:03










            • @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 3 '18 at 3:01
















            7














            No. Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces, and set $Z=Xoplus Y$, with $||(x,y)||:=|x|+|y|$. Assume that $x$ is a extreme point of $X$ with $|x|=1$. Then $(x,0)$ becomes an extreme point of $Z$; indeed, if
            $$(x,0)=frac12(a,y)+frac12(b,z)$$
            for $(a,y),(b,z)$ in the unit ball of $Z$, we then have $a=x=b$, since $x$ is an extreme point, but then $1=|x|=|a|leq||(a,y)||leq 1$, so $y=0$, and analogously, $z=0$.



            So, $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$, is not a dual space, but its unit ball has extreme points.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
              – Idonknow
              Dec 2 '18 at 14:56






            • 1




              @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 2 '18 at 16:03






            • 3




              @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
              – Dirk Werner
              Dec 2 '18 at 22:03










            • @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 3 '18 at 3:01














            7












            7








            7






            No. Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces, and set $Z=Xoplus Y$, with $||(x,y)||:=|x|+|y|$. Assume that $x$ is a extreme point of $X$ with $|x|=1$. Then $(x,0)$ becomes an extreme point of $Z$; indeed, if
            $$(x,0)=frac12(a,y)+frac12(b,z)$$
            for $(a,y),(b,z)$ in the unit ball of $Z$, we then have $a=x=b$, since $x$ is an extreme point, but then $1=|x|=|a|leq||(a,y)||leq 1$, so $y=0$, and analogously, $z=0$.



            So, $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$, is not a dual space, but its unit ball has extreme points.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            No. Let $X$ and $Y$ be Banach spaces, and set $Z=Xoplus Y$, with $||(x,y)||:=|x|+|y|$. Assume that $x$ is a extreme point of $X$ with $|x|=1$. Then $(x,0)$ becomes an extreme point of $Z$; indeed, if
            $$(x,0)=frac12(a,y)+frac12(b,z)$$
            for $(a,y),(b,z)$ in the unit ball of $Z$, we then have $a=x=b$, since $x$ is an extreme point, but then $1=|x|=|a|leq||(a,y)||leq 1$, so $y=0$, and analogously, $z=0$.



            So, $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$, is not a dual space, but its unit ball has extreme points.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 2 '18 at 10:24

























            answered Dec 2 '18 at 9:33









            Meisam Soleimani Malekan

            1,1091411




            1,1091411








            • 1




              How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
              – Idonknow
              Dec 2 '18 at 14:56






            • 1




              @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 2 '18 at 16:03






            • 3




              @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
              – Dirk Werner
              Dec 2 '18 at 22:03










            • @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 3 '18 at 3:01














            • 1




              How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
              – Idonknow
              Dec 2 '18 at 14:56






            • 1




              @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 2 '18 at 16:03






            • 3




              @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
              – Dirk Werner
              Dec 2 '18 at 22:03










            • @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
              – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
              Dec 3 '18 at 3:01








            1




            1




            How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
            – Idonknow
            Dec 2 '18 at 14:56




            How can we prove that $L^2(mathbb R)oplus L^1(mathbb R)$ is not a dual space?
            – Idonknow
            Dec 2 '18 at 14:56




            1




            1




            @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
            – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
            Dec 2 '18 at 16:03




            @Idonknow This is because, $Xoplus Y$ is dual iff both $X$ and $Y$ are dual.
            – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
            Dec 2 '18 at 16:03




            3




            3




            @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
            – Dirk Werner
            Dec 2 '18 at 22:03




            @MeisamSoleimaniMalekan: I am not absolutely positive about your previous comment: Write $C[0,1]^*$ as $L_1[0,1] oplus_1 Y$ with $Y=$ singular measures w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure. So a dual can have a non-dual $ell_1$-direct summand. My argument: If $L_2oplus L_1$ were a dual, it would, being separable, have the RNP, and hence $L_1$ would have the RNP, which it doesn't.
            – Dirk Werner
            Dec 2 '18 at 22:03












            @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
            – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
            Dec 3 '18 at 3:01




            @DirkWerner Thanks for the comment, you are right!
            – Meisam Soleimani Malekan
            Dec 3 '18 at 3:01


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316701%2fif-the-closed-unit-ball-of-banach-space-has-at-least-one-extreme-point-must-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?