Writing equations below each other and using overset [duplicate]
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
overset and align environment: how to get correct alignment?
5 answers
I want to have equations below each other and want to verify the equations by using overset
. I am using:
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
overset{text{...}}{&=}
end{align*}
But now i don't have the equations below each other because the &=
command is not working anymore.
Any clues?
Thank you!
overset
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Werner, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Zarko Nov 18 at 19:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
overset and align environment: how to get correct alignment?
5 answers
I want to have equations below each other and want to verify the equations by using overset
. I am using:
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
overset{text{...}}{&=}
end{align*}
But now i don't have the equations below each other because the &=
command is not working anymore.
Any clues?
Thank you!
overset
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Werner, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Zarko Nov 18 at 19:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
what is purpose ofoverset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.
– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
overset and align environment: how to get correct alignment?
5 answers
I want to have equations below each other and want to verify the equations by using overset
. I am using:
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
overset{text{...}}{&=}
end{align*}
But now i don't have the equations below each other because the &=
command is not working anymore.
Any clues?
Thank you!
overset
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
overset and align environment: how to get correct alignment?
5 answers
I want to have equations below each other and want to verify the equations by using overset
. I am using:
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
overset{text{...}}{&=}
end{align*}
But now i don't have the equations below each other because the &=
command is not working anymore.
Any clues?
Thank you!
This question already has an answer here:
overset and align environment: how to get correct alignment?
5 answers
overset
overset
New contributor
New contributor
edited Nov 18 at 12:51
Zarko
116k865154
116k865154
New contributor
asked Nov 18 at 12:40
chri11
31
31
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Werner, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Zarko Nov 18 at 19:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Werner, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow, TeXnician, Zarko Nov 18 at 19:42
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
what is purpose ofoverset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.
– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
what is purpose ofoverset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.
– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
what is purpose of
overset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58
what is purpose of
overset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's how you can do, but the result is not really pretty, so I add a couple of suggestions.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following works
begin{align*}
3 &overset{hphantom{text{Chebyshev}}}{=} 3\
&overset{text{Chebyshev}}{=} 1+2
end{align*}
but this is much better, in my opinion
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{align*}
If less space is wanted, then you can do like this
begin{alignat*}{2}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &qquad&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{alignat*}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Try
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
& phantom{} overset{a}{=}
end{align*}
end{document}
Alternate
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= b quad text{(Cauchy-Darboux)}
end{align*}
end{document}
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use anoverset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.
– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's how you can do, but the result is not really pretty, so I add a couple of suggestions.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following works
begin{align*}
3 &overset{hphantom{text{Chebyshev}}}{=} 3\
&overset{text{Chebyshev}}{=} 1+2
end{align*}
but this is much better, in my opinion
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{align*}
If less space is wanted, then you can do like this
begin{alignat*}{2}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &qquad&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{alignat*}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's how you can do, but the result is not really pretty, so I add a couple of suggestions.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following works
begin{align*}
3 &overset{hphantom{text{Chebyshev}}}{=} 3\
&overset{text{Chebyshev}}{=} 1+2
end{align*}
but this is much better, in my opinion
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{align*}
If less space is wanted, then you can do like this
begin{alignat*}{2}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &qquad&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{alignat*}
end{document}
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Here's how you can do, but the result is not really pretty, so I add a couple of suggestions.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following works
begin{align*}
3 &overset{hphantom{text{Chebyshev}}}{=} 3\
&overset{text{Chebyshev}}{=} 1+2
end{align*}
but this is much better, in my opinion
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{align*}
If less space is wanted, then you can do like this
begin{alignat*}{2}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &qquad&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{alignat*}
end{document}
Here's how you can do, but the result is not really pretty, so I add a couple of suggestions.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
The following works
begin{align*}
3 &overset{hphantom{text{Chebyshev}}}{=} 3\
&overset{text{Chebyshev}}{=} 1+2
end{align*}
but this is much better, in my opinion
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{align*}
If less space is wanted, then you can do like this
begin{alignat*}{2}
3 &= 3\
&= 1+2 &qquad&text{(Chebyshev)}
end{alignat*}
end{document}
answered Nov 18 at 16:52
egreg
699k8518593130
699k8518593130
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Try
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
& phantom{} overset{a}{=}
end{align*}
end{document}
Alternate
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= b quad text{(Cauchy-Darboux)}
end{align*}
end{document}
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use anoverset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.
– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Try
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
& phantom{} overset{a}{=}
end{align*}
end{document}
Alternate
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= b quad text{(Cauchy-Darboux)}
end{align*}
end{document}
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use anoverset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.
– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Try
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
& phantom{} overset{a}{=}
end{align*}
end{document}
Alternate
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= b quad text{(Cauchy-Darboux)}
end{align*}
end{document}
Try
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
& phantom{} overset{a}{=}
end{align*}
end{document}
Alternate
documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
3 &= 3\
&= b quad text{(Cauchy-Darboux)}
end{align*}
end{document}
edited Nov 18 at 16:10
Kurt
33.9k846156
33.9k846156
answered Nov 18 at 13:01
Denis
2,023520
2,023520
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use anoverset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.
– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
add a comment |
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use anoverset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.
– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
Thank you for your answer. This is almost working but he then puts "a" below the equation so if i have a longer term like Tschebyscheff then the "T" is below the equation but not the equation itself.
– chri11
Nov 18 at 13:23
OK. I would not use an
overset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
OK. I would not use an
overset
construct then. See an alternate construct below.– Denis
Nov 18 at 14:52
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.se! Can you please make your code snippet compilable?
– Kurt
Nov 18 at 12:52
what is purpose of
overset
? the way how you use them is not allowed.– Zarko
Nov 18 at 12:58