Flutter: Shared Preference or Scoped Model for speed
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I will be storing many small data strings in both scoped model and shared preferences. My question is, in order to retrieve this data back are there any significant speed differences in retrieving this data from either of these sources?
Since I will be doing many "sets" and "gets" I would like to know if anybody has seen any differences in performance using one more than another.
I understand Shared preferences is persistent and scoped model is not however after the app is loaded, the data is synced and I would rather access the data from the fastest source.
database performance dart flutter persistent-storage
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I will be storing many small data strings in both scoped model and shared preferences. My question is, in order to retrieve this data back are there any significant speed differences in retrieving this data from either of these sources?
Since I will be doing many "sets" and "gets" I would like to know if anybody has seen any differences in performance using one more than another.
I understand Shared preferences is persistent and scoped model is not however after the app is loaded, the data is synced and I would rather access the data from the fastest source.
database performance dart flutter persistent-storage
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I will be storing many small data strings in both scoped model and shared preferences. My question is, in order to retrieve this data back are there any significant speed differences in retrieving this data from either of these sources?
Since I will be doing many "sets" and "gets" I would like to know if anybody has seen any differences in performance using one more than another.
I understand Shared preferences is persistent and scoped model is not however after the app is loaded, the data is synced and I would rather access the data from the fastest source.
database performance dart flutter persistent-storage
I will be storing many small data strings in both scoped model and shared preferences. My question is, in order to retrieve this data back are there any significant speed differences in retrieving this data from either of these sources?
Since I will be doing many "sets" and "gets" I would like to know if anybody has seen any differences in performance using one more than another.
I understand Shared preferences is persistent and scoped model is not however after the app is loaded, the data is synced and I would rather access the data from the fastest source.
database performance dart flutter persistent-storage
database performance dart flutter persistent-storage
asked Nov 13 at 7:10
ZeroNine
129213
129213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Firstly, understand that they are not alternatives. You will likely want to back certain parts of your model using shared preferences and this can be done behind scoped model (or BLoC etc). Note that simply updating a shared preference will not trigger a rebuild, which is why you should use one of the shared state patterns and then have that update those items it wants to persist to shared preferences.
Shared preferences is actually implemented as an in memory map that triggers a background write to storage on each update. So 'reads' from shared preferences are inexpensive.
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Firstly, understand that they are not alternatives. You will likely want to back certain parts of your model using shared preferences and this can be done behind scoped model (or BLoC etc). Note that simply updating a shared preference will not trigger a rebuild, which is why you should use one of the shared state patterns and then have that update those items it wants to persist to shared preferences.
Shared preferences is actually implemented as an in memory map that triggers a background write to storage on each update. So 'reads' from shared preferences are inexpensive.
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Firstly, understand that they are not alternatives. You will likely want to back certain parts of your model using shared preferences and this can be done behind scoped model (or BLoC etc). Note that simply updating a shared preference will not trigger a rebuild, which is why you should use one of the shared state patterns and then have that update those items it wants to persist to shared preferences.
Shared preferences is actually implemented as an in memory map that triggers a background write to storage on each update. So 'reads' from shared preferences are inexpensive.
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Firstly, understand that they are not alternatives. You will likely want to back certain parts of your model using shared preferences and this can be done behind scoped model (or BLoC etc). Note that simply updating a shared preference will not trigger a rebuild, which is why you should use one of the shared state patterns and then have that update those items it wants to persist to shared preferences.
Shared preferences is actually implemented as an in memory map that triggers a background write to storage on each update. So 'reads' from shared preferences are inexpensive.
Firstly, understand that they are not alternatives. You will likely want to back certain parts of your model using shared preferences and this can be done behind scoped model (or BLoC etc). Note that simply updating a shared preference will not trigger a rebuild, which is why you should use one of the shared state patterns and then have that update those items it wants to persist to shared preferences.
Shared preferences is actually implemented as an in memory map that triggers a background write to storage on each update. So 'reads' from shared preferences are inexpensive.
answered Nov 13 at 15:57
Richard Heap
4,6692212
4,6692212
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
add a comment |
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
Thank you for the details. I appreciate it.
– ZeroNine
Nov 13 at 18:34
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53275647%2fflutter-shared-preference-or-scoped-model-for-speed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown