Complex structure : Existence of Local frame
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a real vector bundle $pi : Erightarrow M$ of rank $2n$ over smooth manifold $M$ and $Jin Gamma(E^*otimes E)$(set of smooth sections of vector the bundle) is a complex structure on $E$. And suppose $E$ is trivial over an open set $Usubseteq M$. Show that there is a local frame $(e_1,f_1,dots, e_n, f_n)$ of $E$ over $U$ where $f_i=J(e_i)$.
I have been trying to show this but I have not gotten any advance after I start to think that $e_i$ takes real part and $f_i$ takes imaginary part. I really need help from here. I thank in advance for any help :)
For reference, for any $pin M$, $J$ should satisfy $J(p)^2=-Id_{E_p}$ where $E_p=pi^{-1}({p}).$
differential-geometry vector-bundles
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a real vector bundle $pi : Erightarrow M$ of rank $2n$ over smooth manifold $M$ and $Jin Gamma(E^*otimes E)$(set of smooth sections of vector the bundle) is a complex structure on $E$. And suppose $E$ is trivial over an open set $Usubseteq M$. Show that there is a local frame $(e_1,f_1,dots, e_n, f_n)$ of $E$ over $U$ where $f_i=J(e_i)$.
I have been trying to show this but I have not gotten any advance after I start to think that $e_i$ takes real part and $f_i$ takes imaginary part. I really need help from here. I thank in advance for any help :)
For reference, for any $pin M$, $J$ should satisfy $J(p)^2=-Id_{E_p}$ where $E_p=pi^{-1}({p}).$
differential-geometry vector-bundles
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We have a real vector bundle $pi : Erightarrow M$ of rank $2n$ over smooth manifold $M$ and $Jin Gamma(E^*otimes E)$(set of smooth sections of vector the bundle) is a complex structure on $E$. And suppose $E$ is trivial over an open set $Usubseteq M$. Show that there is a local frame $(e_1,f_1,dots, e_n, f_n)$ of $E$ over $U$ where $f_i=J(e_i)$.
I have been trying to show this but I have not gotten any advance after I start to think that $e_i$ takes real part and $f_i$ takes imaginary part. I really need help from here. I thank in advance for any help :)
For reference, for any $pin M$, $J$ should satisfy $J(p)^2=-Id_{E_p}$ where $E_p=pi^{-1}({p}).$
differential-geometry vector-bundles
We have a real vector bundle $pi : Erightarrow M$ of rank $2n$ over smooth manifold $M$ and $Jin Gamma(E^*otimes E)$(set of smooth sections of vector the bundle) is a complex structure on $E$. And suppose $E$ is trivial over an open set $Usubseteq M$. Show that there is a local frame $(e_1,f_1,dots, e_n, f_n)$ of $E$ over $U$ where $f_i=J(e_i)$.
I have been trying to show this but I have not gotten any advance after I start to think that $e_i$ takes real part and $f_i$ takes imaginary part. I really need help from here. I thank in advance for any help :)
For reference, for any $pin M$, $J$ should satisfy $J(p)^2=-Id_{E_p}$ where $E_p=pi^{-1}({p}).$
differential-geometry vector-bundles
differential-geometry vector-bundles
asked Nov 14 at 12:51
LeB
885217
885217
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34
add a comment |
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998236%2fcomplex-structure-existence-of-local-frame%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you see why there is an inner product on $E$ compatible with $J$ (over $U$)?
– user10354138
Nov 14 at 14:10
@user10354138 Yes. Actually I know that $E$ admits Riemannian metric.
– LeB
Nov 14 at 14:59
@user10354138 But I don't know if that is compatible with $J$
– LeB
Nov 14 at 15:34