an approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.
I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.
I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):
%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)
lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);
N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;
% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;
theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1
z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);
B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;
B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;
p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;
and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)
%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;
% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;
pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );
relError = (p-pApprox)/p;
I will be happy for any suggestions!
Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):
The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)
$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$
For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$
Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).
We have
$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$
which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}
where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.
For the Engeworth approximation:
$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).
The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.
matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.
I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.
I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):
%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)
lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);
N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;
% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;
theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1
z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);
B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;
B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;
p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;
and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)
%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;
% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;
pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );
relError = (p-pApprox)/p;
I will be happy for any suggestions!
Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):
The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)
$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$
For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$
Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).
We have
$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$
which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}
where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.
For the Engeworth approximation:
$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).
The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.
matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.
I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.
I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):
%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)
lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);
N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;
% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;
theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1
z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);
B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;
B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;
p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;
and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)
%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;
% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;
pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );
relError = (p-pApprox)/p;
I will be happy for any suggestions!
Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):
The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)
$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$
For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$
Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).
We have
$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$
which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}
where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.
For the Engeworth approximation:
$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).
The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.
matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing
Relating to the article An approximation to the generalized hypergeometric function, I would like to calculated example of the Poisson distribution $Po(10)$. If you have the possibility, please see the article.
I am seeking advice on reproducing the example 5.1 of the poisson distribution $Po(10)$. According to table 2.1, (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). E.g. $N=1000$? $(a_0,b_0,c_0,d_0)=(1,1,1,1)$? And then $(alpha_0,beta_0,gamma_0,delta_0)=(0,0,0,0)$? But then is $A_2=B_2=0$.
I was trying to implement the formula (3.12) of Takeuchi's approximation approximation in Matlab (the results are different):
%% Takuchi (1984) approximation is formula (3.12)
lambda = 10; x=1;
trueVal=poisspdf(x,lambda);
N = 1000000; % N to infty
% eps=0.01;
% greek=eps/N; % greek=alpha=beta..
greek = 0;
theta=lambda; theta0=lambda/N; mu=N/lambda; % as stated in example 5.1
z=(x-N*mu)/sqrt(N);
B1 = 1/(mu)-1/(greek-mu)-1/(greek+mu)+1/(greek-mu);
sigma=1/sqrt(B1);
% sigma=mu;
B2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2;
B3 = 1/(greek+mu)^3-1/(greek-mu)^3-1/(greek+mu)^3+1/(greek-mu)^3;
A1 = 1/(greek+mu) +1/(greek-mu) -1/(greek+mu) -1/(greek-mu);
A2 = 1/(greek+mu)^2+1/(greek-mu)^2-1/(greek+mu)^2-1/(greek-mu)^2;
p = 1./(sqrt(2*pi*N)*sigma)*exp(-z^2/(2*sigma^2))*...
(...
1+1/(6*sqrt(N))*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)-1/(24*N)*(2*B3*z^4-6*B2*z^2)+ ...
1/(72*N)*(A2*z^3-3*A1*z)^2 ...
);
relErr=(p-trueVal)/trueVal;
and the Engeworth approximation in formula (4.1)
%% Edgeworth approximation
% Example 5.1: Poisson Po(10)
lambda = 10; x=10 ; p=poisspdf(x,lambda);
sigma = lambda; mu = lambda;
n = lambda; % according to the article
y = x;
% z = ( y-n*mu+0.5 )/(sqrt(n)*sigma);
z = ( y-mu )/(sigma);
beta3 = mu/sigma^3; beta4 = mu/sigma^4;
pApprox = 1/( sqrt(2*pi*n*sigma) )*exp( -z^2/2 )*( 1+beta3/(6*sqrt(n))*( ...
z^3-3*z ) + beta4/(24*n)*( z^4-6*z^2+3 ) + beta3^2/(72*n)*( ...
z^6-15*z^4 ) );
relError = (p-pApprox)/p;
I will be happy for any suggestions!
Please see the formulas below (from the discussed article):
The generalizes hypergeometric distribution
has the form GHG(k, l, m, n; $vec{a}$, $vec{b}$, $vec{c}$, $vec{d}$, $theta$)
$$P{X=x}=ccdot frac{prod_{j=1}^m c_j(x)prod_{j=1}^n d_j^-[x]}{x!prod_{j=1}^ka_j(x)prod_{j=1}^l b_j^-[x]}theta^x$$
For the Poisson case (k,l,m,n)=(0,0,0,0). Letting $theta=lambda$ and $theta_0=lambda/N$, we conclude $mu=N/lambda$
Using Takeuchi's approximation in the article, we should use $a_j=alpha_jN+1$, $b_j=beta_jN+1$, $c_j=gamma_jN+1$, $d_j=delta_jN+1$, $alpha_j>0$, $beta_j>0$, $gamma_j>0$, for $alpha_0=0$, we have $a_0=0$ (sure, whether also for the other variables).
We have
$$begin{equation}begin{split}
A_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}\
B_i&=sum_{j=0}^kfrac{1}{(alpha_j+mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^lfrac{1}{(beta_j-mu)^i}-sum_{j=1}^mfrac{1}{(gamma_j+mu)^i}+sum_{j=1}^nfrac{1}{(delta_j-mu)^i}
end{split}end{equation}$$
which we input into
begin{equation}label{eq:approxHida}
begin{split}
p_X(x)&=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi Nsigma}}e^{-frac{z^2}{2sigma^2}}Big[1+(A_2z^3-3A_1z)-frac{1}{24N}( 2B_2z^4-6B_2z^2)\
&+frac{1}{72N}(A_2z^3-3A_1z)^2+oleft(frac{1}{N}right)Big],
end{split}
end{equation}
where $z=(x-Nmu)/sqrt{N}$.
For the Engeworth approximation:
$$P{Y_n=y}=frac{1}{sqrt{2pi n}sigma}e^{-z^2/2}Big( 1+frac{beta_3}{6sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_4}{24sqrt{n}}H_3(z)+frac{beta_3^2}{72sqrt{n}}H_6(z)Big)$$,
where
$z=(y-nmu+0.5)/(sqrt{n}sigma)$
$H_i$'s the Hermite polynomials: $H_3(z)=z^3-3z$, $H_4(z)=z^4-6z^2+3$, $H_6(z)=z^6-15z^4+45z^2-15$. $beta_i=kappa_i/sigma^i$. $kappa_i$ is the i-th cummulant. (in the poisson example are the $beta_i=frac{lambda}{lambda^i}$ and $lambda=n$).
The results should be for $x=1$, the true value 0.00045399 and the relative error for Takeuchi -0.112287 and Edgeworth. -0.163343. The results should be for $x=2$, the true value 0.00227 and the relative error for Takeuchi 0.0604028 and Edgeworth -0.163343.
matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing
matlab hypergeometric-function approximation-theory article-writing
edited Nov 14 at 13:48
asked Nov 14 at 12:53
Rafael
133
133
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05
add a comment |
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998241%2fan-approximation-to-the-generalized-hypergeometric-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
While the question is no doubt interesting, using a pay walled article as the only source is not a good idea. Not everyone will be able to download it. Could you reproduce the relevant definitions?
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 12:56
Happy to do it, just must check, whether posting the definitions from the article will not violate some copy right. Don't you know, whether I can post it here?
– Rafael
Nov 14 at 13:02
Can't say for sure, but if one is not allowed to write a formula down then what is the point of publishing an article at all? As long as you cite it, and don't copy blocks of text, you are good, I think
– Yuriy S
Nov 14 at 13:05