Apostol Calculus, Method of Exhaustion
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In Apostol's Calculus, he goes through the method of exhaustion to find the area under a parabola from $0 to b$. Using the fact that,
begin{align}
&1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2 < frac{n^3}{3} < 1^2+2^2+...+n^2label{1} \
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2) < frac{b^3}{3} < frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2) nonumber \
&Rightarrow s_{n} < frac{b^3}{3} < S_{n} nonumber
end{align}
where $s_{n}$ and $S_{n}$ are the lower and upper approximation (rectangles), respectively, for the area under the parabola. We then have to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ is the only number that satisfies
begin{equation}
s_{n}<A<S_{n} label{2}
end{equation}
for every $ngeq1$. Using the left-most side of the first inequality, he adds $n^2$ and then multiplies both sides by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2} \
&Rightarrow S_{n}<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
for the right-most side of the inequality, he subtracts $n^2$ and multiplies by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2)\
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^3}<s_{n}
end{align*}
this implies,
begin{align*}
frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<A<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
This is where it gets confusing. He says the only possibilities are:
$$begin{array}{ccc}
A>frac{b^3}{3},& A<frac{b^3}{3},& A=frac{b^3}{3}
end{array}$$
and proceeds to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ via contradictions for the first two cases. This is fine, but what about $frac{b^3}{n^2}$ in the inequality? why don't we have to consider the possible relationships between $A$ and $frac{b^3}{n^2}$?
calculus area
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In Apostol's Calculus, he goes through the method of exhaustion to find the area under a parabola from $0 to b$. Using the fact that,
begin{align}
&1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2 < frac{n^3}{3} < 1^2+2^2+...+n^2label{1} \
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2) < frac{b^3}{3} < frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2) nonumber \
&Rightarrow s_{n} < frac{b^3}{3} < S_{n} nonumber
end{align}
where $s_{n}$ and $S_{n}$ are the lower and upper approximation (rectangles), respectively, for the area under the parabola. We then have to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ is the only number that satisfies
begin{equation}
s_{n}<A<S_{n} label{2}
end{equation}
for every $ngeq1$. Using the left-most side of the first inequality, he adds $n^2$ and then multiplies both sides by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2} \
&Rightarrow S_{n}<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
for the right-most side of the inequality, he subtracts $n^2$ and multiplies by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2)\
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^3}<s_{n}
end{align*}
this implies,
begin{align*}
frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<A<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
This is where it gets confusing. He says the only possibilities are:
$$begin{array}{ccc}
A>frac{b^3}{3},& A<frac{b^3}{3},& A=frac{b^3}{3}
end{array}$$
and proceeds to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ via contradictions for the first two cases. This is fine, but what about $frac{b^3}{n^2}$ in the inequality? why don't we have to consider the possible relationships between $A$ and $frac{b^3}{n^2}$?
calculus area
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
1
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In Apostol's Calculus, he goes through the method of exhaustion to find the area under a parabola from $0 to b$. Using the fact that,
begin{align}
&1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2 < frac{n^3}{3} < 1^2+2^2+...+n^2label{1} \
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2) < frac{b^3}{3} < frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2) nonumber \
&Rightarrow s_{n} < frac{b^3}{3} < S_{n} nonumber
end{align}
where $s_{n}$ and $S_{n}$ are the lower and upper approximation (rectangles), respectively, for the area under the parabola. We then have to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ is the only number that satisfies
begin{equation}
s_{n}<A<S_{n} label{2}
end{equation}
for every $ngeq1$. Using the left-most side of the first inequality, he adds $n^2$ and then multiplies both sides by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2} \
&Rightarrow S_{n}<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
for the right-most side of the inequality, he subtracts $n^2$ and multiplies by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2)\
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^3}<s_{n}
end{align*}
this implies,
begin{align*}
frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<A<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
This is where it gets confusing. He says the only possibilities are:
$$begin{array}{ccc}
A>frac{b^3}{3},& A<frac{b^3}{3},& A=frac{b^3}{3}
end{array}$$
and proceeds to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ via contradictions for the first two cases. This is fine, but what about $frac{b^3}{n^2}$ in the inequality? why don't we have to consider the possible relationships between $A$ and $frac{b^3}{n^2}$?
calculus area
In Apostol's Calculus, he goes through the method of exhaustion to find the area under a parabola from $0 to b$. Using the fact that,
begin{align}
&1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2 < frac{n^3}{3} < 1^2+2^2+...+n^2label{1} \
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2) < frac{b^3}{3} < frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2) nonumber \
&Rightarrow s_{n} < frac{b^3}{3} < S_{n} nonumber
end{align}
where $s_{n}$ and $S_{n}$ are the lower and upper approximation (rectangles), respectively, for the area under the parabola. We then have to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ is the only number that satisfies
begin{equation}
s_{n}<A<S_{n} label{2}
end{equation}
for every $ngeq1$. Using the left-most side of the first inequality, he adds $n^2$ and then multiplies both sides by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+n^2)<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2} \
&Rightarrow S_{n}<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
for the right-most side of the inequality, he subtracts $n^2$ and multiplies by $frac{b^3}{n^3}$,
begin{align*}
&frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<frac{b^3}{n^3}(1^2+2^2+...+(n-1)^2)\
&Rightarrow frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^3}<s_{n}
end{align*}
this implies,
begin{align*}
frac{b^3}{3}-frac{b^3}{n^2}<A<frac{b^3}{3}+frac{b^3}{n^2}
end{align*}
This is where it gets confusing. He says the only possibilities are:
$$begin{array}{ccc}
A>frac{b^3}{3},& A<frac{b^3}{3},& A=frac{b^3}{3}
end{array}$$
and proceeds to show that $A=frac{b^3}{3}$ via contradictions for the first two cases. This is fine, but what about $frac{b^3}{n^2}$ in the inequality? why don't we have to consider the possible relationships between $A$ and $frac{b^3}{n^2}$?
calculus area
calculus area
edited Nov 14 at 17:59
asked Nov 14 at 5:32
Jonathan Duran
504
504
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
1
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39
add a comment |
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
1
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
1
1
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997831%2fapostol-calculus-method-of-exhaustion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You have a confusing typo. The far LHS and far RHS of the inequality above "This is where it get confusing" are identical. Please edit.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 14 at 10:58
I see! I have fixed it, thank you very much.
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 14 at 18:00
1
For $bne 0$ we have $|b^{-3}(A-b^3/3|<1/n^2$ for $all$ $nin Bbb Z^+$, which is not possible unless $b^{-3}(A-b^3/3)=0$, which is not possible unless $A=b^3/3$. Note that $A$ and $b$ have no relation to $n$.
– DanielWainfleet
Nov 15 at 6:12
What about $A<frac{b^3}{3}$, wouldn't that satisfy the inequality in your response?
– Jonathan Duran
Nov 15 at 18:39