How should I represent the conjugate of a term in the denominator?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using overline
for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar
results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar
over one letter at a time.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.
Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar
, might just work.
math-mode amsmath
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using overline
for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar
results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar
over one letter at a time.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.
Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar
, might just work.
math-mode amsmath
New contributor
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
1
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Wait a minute...overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.
– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Using overline
for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar
results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar
over one letter at a time.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.
Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar
, might just work.
math-mode amsmath
New contributor
Using overline
for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar
results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar
over one letter at a time.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.
Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar
, might just work.
math-mode amsmath
math-mode amsmath
New contributor
New contributor
edited Nov 19 at 23:28
Sigur
23.3k354135
23.3k354135
New contributor
asked Nov 19 at 23:17
user475924
182
182
New contributor
New contributor
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
1
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Wait a minute...overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.
– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03
|
show 1 more comment
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
1
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Wait a minute...overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.
– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
1
1
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....
frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....
frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Wait a minute...
overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
Wait a minute...
overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
How about this?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined aconjug
command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
How about this?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined aconjug
command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
How about this?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined aconjug
command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
How about this?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
How about this?
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}
edited Nov 20 at 23:20
answered Nov 19 at 23:53
Bernard
162k767192
162k767192
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined aconjug
command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
add a comment |
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined aconjug
command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a
conjug
command. Is that more like you want?– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a
conjug
command. Is that more like you want?– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh
:P– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05
add a comment |
user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460847%2fhow-should-i-represent-the-conjugate-of-a-term-in-the-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24
1
@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30
Not so good solution, but....
frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30
Wait a minute...
overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1
(if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}
.– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00
@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03