What's the difference between `yum install ` and `yum localinstall `

up vote
8
down vote

favorite

If I have an RPM located on a local disk -

what is the diffrefence between the following yum commands?

sudo yum install /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

sudo yum localinstall /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

Note:

I use RedHat/CentOS 7.

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

add a comment |

up vote
8
down vote

favorite

If I have an RPM located on a local disk -

what is the diffrefence between the following yum commands?

sudo yum install /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

sudo yum localinstall /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

Note:

I use RedHat/CentOS 7.

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

add a comment |

up vote
8
down vote

favorite

If I have an RPM located on a local disk -

what is the diffrefence between the following yum commands?

sudo yum install /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

sudo yum localinstall /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

Note:

I use RedHat/CentOS 7.

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

If I have an RPM located on a local disk -

what is the diffrefence between the following yum commands?

sudo yum install /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

sudo yum localinstall /tmp/rpm_name.rpm

Note:

I use RedHat/CentOS 7.

yum rpm

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

edited Nov 20 at 0:28

yagmoth555♦

11k31641

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

asked Nov 19 at 23:54

boardrider

284312

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
9
down vote

accepted

In RHEL 5 and previous versions, yum install only accepted package names from enabled repositories, and did not accept paths to local RPMs; you had to use yum localinstall to install these.

In RHEL 6 and later, yum install accepts both package names and local filenames, so localinstall is no longer necesary, but it's included for backward compatibility.

In RHEL 8, dnf localinstall is simply an alias for dnf install.

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f940791%2fwhats-the-difference-between-yum-install-local-path-and-yum-localinstall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
9
down vote

accepted

In RHEL 5 and previous versions, yum install only accepted package names from enabled repositories, and did not accept paths to local RPMs; you had to use yum localinstall to install these.

In RHEL 6 and later, yum install accepts both package names and local filenames, so localinstall is no longer necesary, but it's included for backward compatibility.

In RHEL 8, dnf localinstall is simply an alias for dnf install.

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

add a comment |

up vote
9
down vote

accepted

In RHEL 5 and previous versions, yum install only accepted package names from enabled repositories, and did not accept paths to local RPMs; you had to use yum localinstall to install these.

In RHEL 6 and later, yum install accepts both package names and local filenames, so localinstall is no longer necesary, but it's included for backward compatibility.

In RHEL 8, dnf localinstall is simply an alias for dnf install.

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

add a comment |

up vote
9
down vote

accepted

In RHEL 5 and previous versions, yum install only accepted package names from enabled repositories, and did not accept paths to local RPMs; you had to use yum localinstall to install these.

In RHEL 6 and later, yum install accepts both package names and local filenames, so localinstall is no longer necesary, but it's included for backward compatibility.

In RHEL 8, dnf localinstall is simply an alias for dnf install.

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

In RHEL 5 and previous versions, yum install only accepted package names from enabled repositories, and did not accept paths to local RPMs; you had to use yum localinstall to install these.

In RHEL 6 and later, yum install accepts both package names and local filenames, so localinstall is no longer necesary, but it's included for backward compatibility.

In RHEL 8, dnf localinstall is simply an alias for dnf install.

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

edited Nov 20 at 2:53

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

answered Nov 20 at 2:02

Michael Hampton♦

162k26299612

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

add a comment |

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

In RHEL 6 and 7, what's the difference, if it wasn't simply an alias until 8? Is it that localinstall only accepts paths until 8?
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Nov 20 at 10:27

@LightnessRacesinOrbit Right, localinstall was the old code and only accepts local paths through RHEL 7. In 8, the old code is gone and localinstall is simply install.
– Michael Hampton♦
Nov 20 at 13:07

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Cfrgtkky