What's the intuition behind this chain rule usage in the fundamental theorem of calc?
$begingroup$
I understand this:
but I don't understand this example fully:
So I get the intuition behind the idea that the sliver at some point x in the area function (g(x)) is just the y coordinate of the original function (f(x)), but I'm sure why we need chain rule in the example. Can someone show me an easier example that might pump my intuition?
Like say the example was this instead:
$$ frac{d}{dx} int_{a}^{x^2} t $$
So the original function t is just a line with a slope of 1 going up at a 45 degree angle. (1,1) and (2,2) are points on $t$. Using chain rule, the derivative of this graph is going to be:
$$x^2 cdot 2x = 2x^3$$ right?
And I guess the intuition behind this is that the upper limit (x^2) is increasing exponentially relative to x and so that needs to be taken into account somehow. Chain rule is that way? It's just strange to me that the area isn't just increasing by $$x^2$$ but by $$x^2 cdot 2x$$
integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand this:
but I don't understand this example fully:
So I get the intuition behind the idea that the sliver at some point x in the area function (g(x)) is just the y coordinate of the original function (f(x)), but I'm sure why we need chain rule in the example. Can someone show me an easier example that might pump my intuition?
Like say the example was this instead:
$$ frac{d}{dx} int_{a}^{x^2} t $$
So the original function t is just a line with a slope of 1 going up at a 45 degree angle. (1,1) and (2,2) are points on $t$. Using chain rule, the derivative of this graph is going to be:
$$x^2 cdot 2x = 2x^3$$ right?
And I guess the intuition behind this is that the upper limit (x^2) is increasing exponentially relative to x and so that needs to be taken into account somehow. Chain rule is that way? It's just strange to me that the area isn't just increasing by $$x^2$$ but by $$x^2 cdot 2x$$
integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand this:
but I don't understand this example fully:
So I get the intuition behind the idea that the sliver at some point x in the area function (g(x)) is just the y coordinate of the original function (f(x)), but I'm sure why we need chain rule in the example. Can someone show me an easier example that might pump my intuition?
Like say the example was this instead:
$$ frac{d}{dx} int_{a}^{x^2} t $$
So the original function t is just a line with a slope of 1 going up at a 45 degree angle. (1,1) and (2,2) are points on $t$. Using chain rule, the derivative of this graph is going to be:
$$x^2 cdot 2x = 2x^3$$ right?
And I guess the intuition behind this is that the upper limit (x^2) is increasing exponentially relative to x and so that needs to be taken into account somehow. Chain rule is that way? It's just strange to me that the area isn't just increasing by $$x^2$$ but by $$x^2 cdot 2x$$
integration
$endgroup$
I understand this:
but I don't understand this example fully:
So I get the intuition behind the idea that the sliver at some point x in the area function (g(x)) is just the y coordinate of the original function (f(x)), but I'm sure why we need chain rule in the example. Can someone show me an easier example that might pump my intuition?
Like say the example was this instead:
$$ frac{d}{dx} int_{a}^{x^2} t $$
So the original function t is just a line with a slope of 1 going up at a 45 degree angle. (1,1) and (2,2) are points on $t$. Using chain rule, the derivative of this graph is going to be:
$$x^2 cdot 2x = 2x^3$$ right?
And I guess the intuition behind this is that the upper limit (x^2) is increasing exponentially relative to x and so that needs to be taken into account somehow. Chain rule is that way? It's just strange to me that the area isn't just increasing by $$x^2$$ but by $$x^2 cdot 2x$$
integration
integration
asked Dec 30 '18 at 18:40
Jwan622Jwan622
2,40111632
2,40111632
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I will use the notation in your screenshot. If you understand that $g(x) = int_a^x f(t) , dt$ has derivative $g'(x) = f(x)$, then $int_a^{h(x)} f(t) , dt = g(h(x))$ has derivative $g'(h(x)) h'(x)$ by the chain rule.
I think any more intuitive explanation about rate of change of area would be more generally explained by whatever intuitive explanation you have for why the chain rule works in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, let $H'(t)=h(t)$, then:
$$int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dt=H(t)|_{f(x)}^{g(x)}=H(g(x))-H(f(x)) Rightarrow \
begin{align}left(int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dtright)'_x&=[H(g(x))-H(f(x))]'_x =\
&=h(g(x))cdot (g(x))'_x-h(f(x))cdot (f(x))'_x.end{align}$$
Since $f(x)=1,g(x)=x^4, h(t)=sec t$, then:
$$left(int_{1}^{x^4} sec t dtright)'_x=h(x^4)cdot (x^4)'_x-h(1)cdot (1)'_x=sec x^4cdot 4x^3.$$
Source: See Variable limits form section at Leibniz integral rule
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057104%2fwhats-the-intuition-behind-this-chain-rule-usage-in-the-fundamental-theorem-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I will use the notation in your screenshot. If you understand that $g(x) = int_a^x f(t) , dt$ has derivative $g'(x) = f(x)$, then $int_a^{h(x)} f(t) , dt = g(h(x))$ has derivative $g'(h(x)) h'(x)$ by the chain rule.
I think any more intuitive explanation about rate of change of area would be more generally explained by whatever intuitive explanation you have for why the chain rule works in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the notation in your screenshot. If you understand that $g(x) = int_a^x f(t) , dt$ has derivative $g'(x) = f(x)$, then $int_a^{h(x)} f(t) , dt = g(h(x))$ has derivative $g'(h(x)) h'(x)$ by the chain rule.
I think any more intuitive explanation about rate of change of area would be more generally explained by whatever intuitive explanation you have for why the chain rule works in general.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the notation in your screenshot. If you understand that $g(x) = int_a^x f(t) , dt$ has derivative $g'(x) = f(x)$, then $int_a^{h(x)} f(t) , dt = g(h(x))$ has derivative $g'(h(x)) h'(x)$ by the chain rule.
I think any more intuitive explanation about rate of change of area would be more generally explained by whatever intuitive explanation you have for why the chain rule works in general.
$endgroup$
I will use the notation in your screenshot. If you understand that $g(x) = int_a^x f(t) , dt$ has derivative $g'(x) = f(x)$, then $int_a^{h(x)} f(t) , dt = g(h(x))$ has derivative $g'(h(x)) h'(x)$ by the chain rule.
I think any more intuitive explanation about rate of change of area would be more generally explained by whatever intuitive explanation you have for why the chain rule works in general.
answered Dec 30 '18 at 18:47
angryavianangryavian
42.7k23482
42.7k23482
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, let $H'(t)=h(t)$, then:
$$int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dt=H(t)|_{f(x)}^{g(x)}=H(g(x))-H(f(x)) Rightarrow \
begin{align}left(int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dtright)'_x&=[H(g(x))-H(f(x))]'_x =\
&=h(g(x))cdot (g(x))'_x-h(f(x))cdot (f(x))'_x.end{align}$$
Since $f(x)=1,g(x)=x^4, h(t)=sec t$, then:
$$left(int_{1}^{x^4} sec t dtright)'_x=h(x^4)cdot (x^4)'_x-h(1)cdot (1)'_x=sec x^4cdot 4x^3.$$
Source: See Variable limits form section at Leibniz integral rule
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, let $H'(t)=h(t)$, then:
$$int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dt=H(t)|_{f(x)}^{g(x)}=H(g(x))-H(f(x)) Rightarrow \
begin{align}left(int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dtright)'_x&=[H(g(x))-H(f(x))]'_x =\
&=h(g(x))cdot (g(x))'_x-h(f(x))cdot (f(x))'_x.end{align}$$
Since $f(x)=1,g(x)=x^4, h(t)=sec t$, then:
$$left(int_{1}^{x^4} sec t dtright)'_x=h(x^4)cdot (x^4)'_x-h(1)cdot (1)'_x=sec x^4cdot 4x^3.$$
Source: See Variable limits form section at Leibniz integral rule
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general, let $H'(t)=h(t)$, then:
$$int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dt=H(t)|_{f(x)}^{g(x)}=H(g(x))-H(f(x)) Rightarrow \
begin{align}left(int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dtright)'_x&=[H(g(x))-H(f(x))]'_x =\
&=h(g(x))cdot (g(x))'_x-h(f(x))cdot (f(x))'_x.end{align}$$
Since $f(x)=1,g(x)=x^4, h(t)=sec t$, then:
$$left(int_{1}^{x^4} sec t dtright)'_x=h(x^4)cdot (x^4)'_x-h(1)cdot (1)'_x=sec x^4cdot 4x^3.$$
Source: See Variable limits form section at Leibniz integral rule
.
$endgroup$
In general, let $H'(t)=h(t)$, then:
$$int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dt=H(t)|_{f(x)}^{g(x)}=H(g(x))-H(f(x)) Rightarrow \
begin{align}left(int_{f(x)}^{g(x)} h(t)dtright)'_x&=[H(g(x))-H(f(x))]'_x =\
&=h(g(x))cdot (g(x))'_x-h(f(x))cdot (f(x))'_x.end{align}$$
Since $f(x)=1,g(x)=x^4, h(t)=sec t$, then:
$$left(int_{1}^{x^4} sec t dtright)'_x=h(x^4)cdot (x^4)'_x-h(1)cdot (1)'_x=sec x^4cdot 4x^3.$$
Source: See Variable limits form section at Leibniz integral rule
.
answered Dec 30 '18 at 19:39
farruhotafarruhota
22.2k2942
22.2k2942
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057104%2fwhats-the-intuition-behind-this-chain-rule-usage-in-the-fundamental-theorem-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Let $F(x)=int_a^{g(x)} f(t),dt$ where $f$ is continuous and $g$ is differentiable. Then, $F(x+h)-F(x)=int_{g(x)}^{g(x+h)}f(t),dt$. Using the mean value theorem, there is a number $xiin[g(x),g(x+h)]$ so that $$F(x+h)-F(x)=f(xi) (g(x+h)-g(x))$$ Now divide by $h$ and let $hto0$. Can you finish? Does this provide the intuition you covet?
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Dec 30 '18 at 20:27
$begingroup$
nah I don't see it. I liked the accepted answer better.
$endgroup$
– Jwan622
Jan 4 at 14:47
$begingroup$
If you don't understand this, I suggest you have another look and try your best. It is a very basic development. When you divide by $h$ and let $hto0$ you will get$f(g(x)),times, g'(x)$
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jan 4 at 17:24