What is the sufficient and necessary conditions that $-1 in G$, where $G$ is a multiplicative group of a...












4












$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following conjecture.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be a finite ring with an identity. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.




My attempt:



$Leftarrow$:
Case 1:If $text{Char}(R)=2$, then $-1=1$. Since $G$ is a multiplicative group, the indentity $1in G$. Hence $-1in G$.



Case 2: If $2mid d$, then ...(I do not know how to prove in this case.)



$Rightarrow$: Suppose that $-1 in G$. Then $(-1)^2=1in G$. The multiplicative order of $-1$ is either $2$ or $1$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=1$, then $-1=1$. Consequently, $text{Char}(R)=2$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=2$, then it must have $text{Ord}(-1) mid text{Ord}(G)$, i.e., $2mid d$.



===============



So does $2mid d$ implies that $-1in G$ ? If the conjecture does not hold, then can we have a sufficient and necessary condition of $-1 in G$?



Thanks to Arthur, we have the following result using the fact that $-1$ is the only element of order $2$.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be an integral domain. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:44










  • $begingroup$
    If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:58
















4












$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following conjecture.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be a finite ring with an identity. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.




My attempt:



$Leftarrow$:
Case 1:If $text{Char}(R)=2$, then $-1=1$. Since $G$ is a multiplicative group, the indentity $1in G$. Hence $-1in G$.



Case 2: If $2mid d$, then ...(I do not know how to prove in this case.)



$Rightarrow$: Suppose that $-1 in G$. Then $(-1)^2=1in G$. The multiplicative order of $-1$ is either $2$ or $1$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=1$, then $-1=1$. Consequently, $text{Char}(R)=2$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=2$, then it must have $text{Ord}(-1) mid text{Ord}(G)$, i.e., $2mid d$.



===============



So does $2mid d$ implies that $-1in G$ ? If the conjecture does not hold, then can we have a sufficient and necessary condition of $-1 in G$?



Thanks to Arthur, we have the following result using the fact that $-1$ is the only element of order $2$.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be an integral domain. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:44










  • $begingroup$
    If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:58














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following conjecture.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be a finite ring with an identity. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.




My attempt:



$Leftarrow$:
Case 1:If $text{Char}(R)=2$, then $-1=1$. Since $G$ is a multiplicative group, the indentity $1in G$. Hence $-1in G$.



Case 2: If $2mid d$, then ...(I do not know how to prove in this case.)



$Rightarrow$: Suppose that $-1 in G$. Then $(-1)^2=1in G$. The multiplicative order of $-1$ is either $2$ or $1$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=1$, then $-1=1$. Consequently, $text{Char}(R)=2$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=2$, then it must have $text{Ord}(-1) mid text{Ord}(G)$, i.e., $2mid d$.



===============



So does $2mid d$ implies that $-1in G$ ? If the conjecture does not hold, then can we have a sufficient and necessary condition of $-1 in G$?



Thanks to Arthur, we have the following result using the fact that $-1$ is the only element of order $2$.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be an integral domain. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to prove the following conjecture.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be a finite ring with an identity. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.




My attempt:



$Leftarrow$:
Case 1:If $text{Char}(R)=2$, then $-1=1$. Since $G$ is a multiplicative group, the indentity $1in G$. Hence $-1in G$.



Case 2: If $2mid d$, then ...(I do not know how to prove in this case.)



$Rightarrow$: Suppose that $-1 in G$. Then $(-1)^2=1in G$. The multiplicative order of $-1$ is either $2$ or $1$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=1$, then $-1=1$. Consequently, $text{Char}(R)=2$. If $text{Ord}(-1)=2$, then it must have $text{Ord}(-1) mid text{Ord}(G)$, i.e., $2mid d$.



===============



So does $2mid d$ implies that $-1in G$ ? If the conjecture does not hold, then can we have a sufficient and necessary condition of $-1 in G$?



Thanks to Arthur, we have the following result using the fact that $-1$ is the only element of order $2$.




Let $(R, +,times)$ be an integral domain. Let $G$ be a
subgroup of $(R,times)$ with order $d$. Then $-1in G$, if and only
if $2mid d$ or $text{Char}(R)=2$.








abstract-algebra ring-theory finite-groups conjectures






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 12:29









Shaun

10.9k113687




10.9k113687










asked Dec 31 '18 at 8:33









zongxiang yizongxiang yi

352110




352110








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:44










  • $begingroup$
    If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:58














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:44










  • $begingroup$
    If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Pongrácz
    Dec 31 '18 at 8:58








1




1




$begingroup$
@A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Dec 31 '18 at 8:43




$begingroup$
@A.Pongrácz Nice. To obtain the sufficient and necessary condition, can the original conjecture be modified a bit ?
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Dec 31 '18 at 8:43




1




1




$begingroup$
Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:44




$begingroup$
Arthur's answer covers that elegantly.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:44












$begingroup$
If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:58




$begingroup$
If I were you, I would accept Arthur's answer. That pretty much solves your problem.
$endgroup$
– A. Pongrácz
Dec 31 '18 at 8:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Counterexample: let $R=Bbb Z_{12}$ with standard addition and multiplication, and $G={1,5}$.



As for sufficient conditions, if $R$ is an integral domain with characteristic different from $2$, then the equation $x^2=1$ has exactly two solutions (rewrite to $(x-1)(x+1)=0$ and use the definition of integral domains). Thus $-1$ is the only element with multiplicative order $2$, and by Cauchy's theorem must be in $G$ if $2mid ord(G)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    It is clearly not true: let $R:= (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)times (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)$. Then $(1,1)$ is the identity element, and the $2$-element subgroup in the multiplicative group ${(1,-1),(1,1)}$ does not contain $(-1,-1)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057512%2fwhat-is-the-sufficient-and-necessary-conditions-that-1-in-g-where-g-is-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      Counterexample: let $R=Bbb Z_{12}$ with standard addition and multiplication, and $G={1,5}$.



      As for sufficient conditions, if $R$ is an integral domain with characteristic different from $2$, then the equation $x^2=1$ has exactly two solutions (rewrite to $(x-1)(x+1)=0$ and use the definition of integral domains). Thus $-1$ is the only element with multiplicative order $2$, and by Cauchy's theorem must be in $G$ if $2mid ord(G)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        7












        $begingroup$

        Counterexample: let $R=Bbb Z_{12}$ with standard addition and multiplication, and $G={1,5}$.



        As for sufficient conditions, if $R$ is an integral domain with characteristic different from $2$, then the equation $x^2=1$ has exactly two solutions (rewrite to $(x-1)(x+1)=0$ and use the definition of integral domains). Thus $-1$ is the only element with multiplicative order $2$, and by Cauchy's theorem must be in $G$ if $2mid ord(G)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Counterexample: let $R=Bbb Z_{12}$ with standard addition and multiplication, and $G={1,5}$.



          As for sufficient conditions, if $R$ is an integral domain with characteristic different from $2$, then the equation $x^2=1$ has exactly two solutions (rewrite to $(x-1)(x+1)=0$ and use the definition of integral domains). Thus $-1$ is the only element with multiplicative order $2$, and by Cauchy's theorem must be in $G$ if $2mid ord(G)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Counterexample: let $R=Bbb Z_{12}$ with standard addition and multiplication, and $G={1,5}$.



          As for sufficient conditions, if $R$ is an integral domain with characteristic different from $2$, then the equation $x^2=1$ has exactly two solutions (rewrite to $(x-1)(x+1)=0$ and use the definition of integral domains). Thus $-1$ is the only element with multiplicative order $2$, and by Cauchy's theorem must be in $G$ if $2mid ord(G)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 31 '18 at 8:42









          ArthurArthur

          123k7122211




          123k7122211























              4












              $begingroup$

              It is clearly not true: let $R:= (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)times (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)$. Then $(1,1)$ is the identity element, and the $2$-element subgroup in the multiplicative group ${(1,-1),(1,1)}$ does not contain $(-1,-1)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                It is clearly not true: let $R:= (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)times (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)$. Then $(1,1)$ is the identity element, and the $2$-element subgroup in the multiplicative group ${(1,-1),(1,1)}$ does not contain $(-1,-1)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  It is clearly not true: let $R:= (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)times (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)$. Then $(1,1)$ is the identity element, and the $2$-element subgroup in the multiplicative group ${(1,-1),(1,1)}$ does not contain $(-1,-1)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It is clearly not true: let $R:= (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)times (mathbb{Z}_3, +, cdot)$. Then $(1,1)$ is the identity element, and the $2$-element subgroup in the multiplicative group ${(1,-1),(1,1)}$ does not contain $(-1,-1)$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 31 '18 at 8:38









                  A. PongráczA. Pongrácz

                  6,1171929




                  6,1171929






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057512%2fwhat-is-the-sufficient-and-necessary-conditions-that-1-in-g-where-g-is-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

                      How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

                      Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?