How to fix the version reported by psql?












1















I have been working on an Ansible script for defining the standard template of our corporate servers. For some historical reasons, we chose to stick with PostgreSQL 9.6 even though we're using Ubuntu 18.04, which comes with PostgreSQL 11. We intend to catch up with the latest version after a transition phase of some months.



The 18.04 image we use from AWS has PG 11. After uninstalling version 11 and installing 9.6 on our test server, the result of psql --version is still:



psql (PostgreSQL) 11.1 (Ubuntu 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1)


However, apt-cache policy postgresql-11 gives me:



postgresql-11:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1
Version table:
11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1 500
500 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt bionic-pgdg/main amd64 Packages


pg_lsclusters yields:



Ver Cluster Port Status Owner    Data directory               Log file
9.6 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/9.6/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.6-main.log


I find all that misleading, even in the light of the fact that psql will talk to the server listening on 5432. I'd rather leave things in a consistent and explicit state, and not run the risk of some compatibility problems in our scripts.



My question is: is it possible to fix the version reported by psql so that it can report a version that is actually present?



I feel like the removal of version 11 left some remnants which appear unwanted to me, despite of the task specifying purge and autoremove.



[EDIT 2019-02-10]



The comment by @steeldriver put me on the right track. My Ansible role was installing postgresql-9.6 and postgresql-contrib, which didn't make sense because as I understood it, without the specification of 9.6 as the version, postgresql-contrib would stand for its current most up-to-date package, which is postgresql-contrib-11, which in turn has postgresql-11 as a dependency.



I ended up with versions 9.6 and 11, and erroneously thought that the Amazon image had postgresql-11 in it. I was wrong.



When I removed postgresql-11 (with autoremove) the uninstallation still left behind the /var/lib/postgresql/11/bin folder, where a psql binary remained. The wrapper that launches PostgreSQL binaries enumerates the versions in /var/lib/postgresql and for each, checks whether the psql binary is on the filesystem. If it is, then the most recent version is used.



With the comments and answers, I now understand that this is certainly because the package to remove was a flavor of postgresql-client-common and not just postgresql-11.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

    – steeldriver
    Feb 6 at 13:53
















1















I have been working on an Ansible script for defining the standard template of our corporate servers. For some historical reasons, we chose to stick with PostgreSQL 9.6 even though we're using Ubuntu 18.04, which comes with PostgreSQL 11. We intend to catch up with the latest version after a transition phase of some months.



The 18.04 image we use from AWS has PG 11. After uninstalling version 11 and installing 9.6 on our test server, the result of psql --version is still:



psql (PostgreSQL) 11.1 (Ubuntu 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1)


However, apt-cache policy postgresql-11 gives me:



postgresql-11:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1
Version table:
11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1 500
500 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt bionic-pgdg/main amd64 Packages


pg_lsclusters yields:



Ver Cluster Port Status Owner    Data directory               Log file
9.6 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/9.6/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.6-main.log


I find all that misleading, even in the light of the fact that psql will talk to the server listening on 5432. I'd rather leave things in a consistent and explicit state, and not run the risk of some compatibility problems in our scripts.



My question is: is it possible to fix the version reported by psql so that it can report a version that is actually present?



I feel like the removal of version 11 left some remnants which appear unwanted to me, despite of the task specifying purge and autoremove.



[EDIT 2019-02-10]



The comment by @steeldriver put me on the right track. My Ansible role was installing postgresql-9.6 and postgresql-contrib, which didn't make sense because as I understood it, without the specification of 9.6 as the version, postgresql-contrib would stand for its current most up-to-date package, which is postgresql-contrib-11, which in turn has postgresql-11 as a dependency.



I ended up with versions 9.6 and 11, and erroneously thought that the Amazon image had postgresql-11 in it. I was wrong.



When I removed postgresql-11 (with autoremove) the uninstallation still left behind the /var/lib/postgresql/11/bin folder, where a psql binary remained. The wrapper that launches PostgreSQL binaries enumerates the versions in /var/lib/postgresql and for each, checks whether the psql binary is on the filesystem. If it is, then the most recent version is used.



With the comments and answers, I now understand that this is certainly because the package to remove was a flavor of postgresql-client-common and not just postgresql-11.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

    – steeldriver
    Feb 6 at 13:53














1












1








1








I have been working on an Ansible script for defining the standard template of our corporate servers. For some historical reasons, we chose to stick with PostgreSQL 9.6 even though we're using Ubuntu 18.04, which comes with PostgreSQL 11. We intend to catch up with the latest version after a transition phase of some months.



The 18.04 image we use from AWS has PG 11. After uninstalling version 11 and installing 9.6 on our test server, the result of psql --version is still:



psql (PostgreSQL) 11.1 (Ubuntu 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1)


However, apt-cache policy postgresql-11 gives me:



postgresql-11:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1
Version table:
11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1 500
500 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt bionic-pgdg/main amd64 Packages


pg_lsclusters yields:



Ver Cluster Port Status Owner    Data directory               Log file
9.6 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/9.6/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.6-main.log


I find all that misleading, even in the light of the fact that psql will talk to the server listening on 5432. I'd rather leave things in a consistent and explicit state, and not run the risk of some compatibility problems in our scripts.



My question is: is it possible to fix the version reported by psql so that it can report a version that is actually present?



I feel like the removal of version 11 left some remnants which appear unwanted to me, despite of the task specifying purge and autoremove.



[EDIT 2019-02-10]



The comment by @steeldriver put me on the right track. My Ansible role was installing postgresql-9.6 and postgresql-contrib, which didn't make sense because as I understood it, without the specification of 9.6 as the version, postgresql-contrib would stand for its current most up-to-date package, which is postgresql-contrib-11, which in turn has postgresql-11 as a dependency.



I ended up with versions 9.6 and 11, and erroneously thought that the Amazon image had postgresql-11 in it. I was wrong.



When I removed postgresql-11 (with autoremove) the uninstallation still left behind the /var/lib/postgresql/11/bin folder, where a psql binary remained. The wrapper that launches PostgreSQL binaries enumerates the versions in /var/lib/postgresql and for each, checks whether the psql binary is on the filesystem. If it is, then the most recent version is used.



With the comments and answers, I now understand that this is certainly because the package to remove was a flavor of postgresql-client-common and not just postgresql-11.










share|improve this question
















I have been working on an Ansible script for defining the standard template of our corporate servers. For some historical reasons, we chose to stick with PostgreSQL 9.6 even though we're using Ubuntu 18.04, which comes with PostgreSQL 11. We intend to catch up with the latest version after a transition phase of some months.



The 18.04 image we use from AWS has PG 11. After uninstalling version 11 and installing 9.6 on our test server, the result of psql --version is still:



psql (PostgreSQL) 11.1 (Ubuntu 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1)


However, apt-cache policy postgresql-11 gives me:



postgresql-11:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1
Version table:
11.1-3.pgdg18.04+1 500
500 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt bionic-pgdg/main amd64 Packages


pg_lsclusters yields:



Ver Cluster Port Status Owner    Data directory               Log file
9.6 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/9.6/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-9.6-main.log


I find all that misleading, even in the light of the fact that psql will talk to the server listening on 5432. I'd rather leave things in a consistent and explicit state, and not run the risk of some compatibility problems in our scripts.



My question is: is it possible to fix the version reported by psql so that it can report a version that is actually present?



I feel like the removal of version 11 left some remnants which appear unwanted to me, despite of the task specifying purge and autoremove.



[EDIT 2019-02-10]



The comment by @steeldriver put me on the right track. My Ansible role was installing postgresql-9.6 and postgresql-contrib, which didn't make sense because as I understood it, without the specification of 9.6 as the version, postgresql-contrib would stand for its current most up-to-date package, which is postgresql-contrib-11, which in turn has postgresql-11 as a dependency.



I ended up with versions 9.6 and 11, and erroneously thought that the Amazon image had postgresql-11 in it. I was wrong.



When I removed postgresql-11 (with autoremove) the uninstallation still left behind the /var/lib/postgresql/11/bin folder, where a psql binary remained. The wrapper that launches PostgreSQL binaries enumerates the versions in /var/lib/postgresql and for each, checks whether the psql binary is on the filesystem. If it is, then the most recent version is used.



With the comments and answers, I now understand that this is certainly because the package to remove was a flavor of postgresql-client-common and not just postgresql-11.







postgresql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 10 at 1:52







AbVog

















asked Feb 6 at 13:31









AbVogAbVog

1085




1085








  • 2





    What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

    – steeldriver
    Feb 6 at 13:53














  • 2





    What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

    – steeldriver
    Feb 6 at 13:53








2




2





What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

– steeldriver
Feb 6 at 13:53





What packages did you uninstall / replace exactly? AFAIK the psql binary would be part of the client package (e.g. postgresql-client-11)

– steeldriver
Feb 6 at 13:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














The comment here is completely and totally accurate. You can easily confirm this by utilizing the sadly underused Ubuntu Package Search which for 18.04 reports that psql is part of postgresql-client-common



psql is reporting the version of psql installed as expected.



If you want to see the version of a package that you have installed dpkg -l packagename is useful.






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1116101%2fhow-to-fix-the-version-reported-by-psql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The comment here is completely and totally accurate. You can easily confirm this by utilizing the sadly underused Ubuntu Package Search which for 18.04 reports that psql is part of postgresql-client-common



    psql is reporting the version of psql installed as expected.



    If you want to see the version of a package that you have installed dpkg -l packagename is useful.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      The comment here is completely and totally accurate. You can easily confirm this by utilizing the sadly underused Ubuntu Package Search which for 18.04 reports that psql is part of postgresql-client-common



      psql is reporting the version of psql installed as expected.



      If you want to see the version of a package that you have installed dpkg -l packagename is useful.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        The comment here is completely and totally accurate. You can easily confirm this by utilizing the sadly underused Ubuntu Package Search which for 18.04 reports that psql is part of postgresql-client-common



        psql is reporting the version of psql installed as expected.



        If you want to see the version of a package that you have installed dpkg -l packagename is useful.






        share|improve this answer













        The comment here is completely and totally accurate. You can easily confirm this by utilizing the sadly underused Ubuntu Package Search which for 18.04 reports that psql is part of postgresql-client-common



        psql is reporting the version of psql installed as expected.



        If you want to see the version of a package that you have installed dpkg -l packagename is useful.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 6 at 14:16









        Elder GeekElder Geek

        27.5k1055130




        27.5k1055130






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1116101%2fhow-to-fix-the-version-reported-by-psql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

            How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

            Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?