Is Hom scheme between projective curves of large genus finite etale?
$begingroup$
Let $K$ be a number field, $T$ be a finite set containing some finite places of $K$, and $S=operatorname{Spec} O_{K,T}$. If $X,Y$ are two projective smooth curves over $S$ with genus large than $1$ and $0$ respectively. Then is the Hom scheme $Hom(X,Y)$ finite etale over $S$?
Motivation: Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $mathbb Q$, then $E$ can be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$ where $N$ is the conductor of $E$. We know there is a non-constant map $phi:X_0(N) rightarrow E$ over $mathbb Q$ where the modular curve $X_0(N)$ is also defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$, then can $phi$ also be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$?
number-theory algebraic-geometry arithmetic-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K$ be a number field, $T$ be a finite set containing some finite places of $K$, and $S=operatorname{Spec} O_{K,T}$. If $X,Y$ are two projective smooth curves over $S$ with genus large than $1$ and $0$ respectively. Then is the Hom scheme $Hom(X,Y)$ finite etale over $S$?
Motivation: Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $mathbb Q$, then $E$ can be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$ where $N$ is the conductor of $E$. We know there is a non-constant map $phi:X_0(N) rightarrow E$ over $mathbb Q$ where the modular curve $X_0(N)$ is also defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$, then can $phi$ also be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$?
number-theory algebraic-geometry arithmetic-geometry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $K$ be a number field, $T$ be a finite set containing some finite places of $K$, and $S=operatorname{Spec} O_{K,T}$. If $X,Y$ are two projective smooth curves over $S$ with genus large than $1$ and $0$ respectively. Then is the Hom scheme $Hom(X,Y)$ finite etale over $S$?
Motivation: Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $mathbb Q$, then $E$ can be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$ where $N$ is the conductor of $E$. We know there is a non-constant map $phi:X_0(N) rightarrow E$ over $mathbb Q$ where the modular curve $X_0(N)$ is also defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$, then can $phi$ also be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$?
number-theory algebraic-geometry arithmetic-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $K$ be a number field, $T$ be a finite set containing some finite places of $K$, and $S=operatorname{Spec} O_{K,T}$. If $X,Y$ are two projective smooth curves over $S$ with genus large than $1$ and $0$ respectively. Then is the Hom scheme $Hom(X,Y)$ finite etale over $S$?
Motivation: Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $mathbb Q$, then $E$ can be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$ where $N$ is the conductor of $E$. We know there is a non-constant map $phi:X_0(N) rightarrow E$ over $mathbb Q$ where the modular curve $X_0(N)$ is also defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$, then can $phi$ also be defined over $mathbb Z[1/N]$?
number-theory algebraic-geometry arithmetic-geometry
number-theory algebraic-geometry arithmetic-geometry
edited Dec 10 '18 at 20:52
zzy
asked Dec 9 '18 at 19:08
zzyzzy
2,6431420
2,6431420
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032811%2fis-hom-scheme-between-projective-curves-of-large-genus-finite-etale%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032811%2fis-hom-scheme-between-projective-curves-of-large-genus-finite-etale%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If $Y$ is an elliptic curve, then this is false. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism. Now, any isogeny $phi:Yto Y$ defines a new morphism $phi circ f:Xto Y$ and the degree of this map increases. Thus, $Hom(X,Y)$ is not even finite etale over $mathbb{C}$. Anyway, if genus(Y) > 1, then $Hom(X,Y)$ is finite (assuming $X$ and $Y$ are projective smooth curves of genus >1). It is not etale in general, as there are maps $Xto Y$ over $mathbb{F}_p$ which can't be lifted in general. (Hint: find a curve $X$ and an automorphism over $mathbb{F}_p$ of order $> 84(g-1)$.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Oh, thank you! What I thought before is if $Hom$ is finite etale over $O_{K,T}$, the existence of a $K$ point will imply $Hom$ has an irreducible component isomorphic to $O_{K,T}$ thus $Hom$ has a $O_{K,T}$ point.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 20:08
$begingroup$
You're welcome. I think that the hom-scheme will complicate things here a bit. It is not of finite type over $O_{K,T}$. However, the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion for properness. Indeed, any morphism $X_Kto Y_K$ with $X$ and $Y$ smooth proper curves of genus $>0$ over $O_{K,T}$ extends (uniquely) to a morphism $Xto Y$. You can read Liu-Tong's paper on Neron models for a proof.
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:15
$begingroup$
What you ask in your motivation has nothing to do with the "finite etaleness" of the Hom-scheme. The extension you desire exists by the Neron mapping property of a smooth proper model of E over ℤ[1/N] (and the fact that X0(N) is smooth over ℤ[1/N]). (Thus: the hom-scheme satisfies the valuative criterion of properness. It is not necessarily proper though, because it is not of finite type.)
$endgroup$
– Ariyan Javanpeykar
Dec 12 '18 at 20:16
$begingroup$
@AriyanJavanpeykar Thank you!The reference is useful.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 12 '18 at 22:33