Is the ability of Sphinx of New Prahv cumulative? [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
How does having multiple permanents with the same name affect those permanents' abilities?
1 answer
The passive ability says
Spells your opponents cast that target Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
If I have two copies in play, does the opponent has to pay {4} extra to target one Sphinx with a spell?
magic-the-gathering
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 19 at 14:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
How does having multiple permanents with the same name affect those permanents' abilities?
1 answer
The passive ability says
Spells your opponents cast that target Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
If I have two copies in play, does the opponent has to pay {4} extra to target one Sphinx with a spell?
magic-the-gathering
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 19 at 14:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
How does having multiple permanents with the same name affect those permanents' abilities?
1 answer
The passive ability says
Spells your opponents cast that target Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
If I have two copies in play, does the opponent has to pay {4} extra to target one Sphinx with a spell?
magic-the-gathering
This question already has an answer here:
How does having multiple permanents with the same name affect those permanents' abilities?
1 answer
The passive ability says
Spells your opponents cast that target Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
If I have two copies in play, does the opponent has to pay {4} extra to target one Sphinx with a spell?
This question already has an answer here:
How does having multiple permanents with the same name affect those permanents' abilities?
1 answer
magic-the-gathering
magic-the-gathering
edited Mar 19 at 12:00
Glorfindel
5,98611843
5,98611843
asked Mar 19 at 11:27
DorukoDoruko
424111
424111
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 19 at 14:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by GendoIkari
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 19 at 14:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, just {2}; in this case, Sphinx of New Prahv refers only to itself. (Also, if the card's name somehow changes, it would still refer to itself.) The relevant rule is
201.4. Text that refers to the object it's on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.
It would be different ({4}) if the card would read
Spells your opponents cast that target a card named Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
but it doesn't.
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, just {2}; in this case, Sphinx of New Prahv refers only to itself. (Also, if the card's name somehow changes, it would still refer to itself.) The relevant rule is
201.4. Text that refers to the object it's on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.
It would be different ({4}) if the card would read
Spells your opponents cast that target a card named Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
but it doesn't.
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
No, just {2}; in this case, Sphinx of New Prahv refers only to itself. (Also, if the card's name somehow changes, it would still refer to itself.) The relevant rule is
201.4. Text that refers to the object it's on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.
It would be different ({4}) if the card would read
Spells your opponents cast that target a card named Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
but it doesn't.
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
No, just {2}; in this case, Sphinx of New Prahv refers only to itself. (Also, if the card's name somehow changes, it would still refer to itself.) The relevant rule is
201.4. Text that refers to the object it's on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.
It would be different ({4}) if the card would read
Spells your opponents cast that target a card named Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
but it doesn't.
No, just {2}; in this case, Sphinx of New Prahv refers only to itself. (Also, if the card's name somehow changes, it would still refer to itself.) The relevant rule is
201.4. Text that refers to the object it's on by name means just that particular object and not any other objects with that name, regardless of any name changes caused by game effects.
It would be different ({4}) if the card would read
Spells your opponents cast that target a card named Sphinx of New Prahv cost {2} more to cast.
but it doesn't.
edited Mar 19 at 11:59
answered Mar 19 at 11:29
GlorfindelGlorfindel
5,98611843
5,98611843
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
add a comment |
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
If the opponent's spell targets both Sphinxes then each would apply the +2 making +4
– Alopex
Mar 22 at 12:42
add a comment |