Intersection of two compact subsets in a Hausdorff space












0












$begingroup$


Prove that if $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets of a Hausdorff space $X$, then $K cap L$ is a compact subset of $X$.



I understand that since $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets, they each have finite coverings. Do I have to show that the intersection of $2$ finite coverings is a compact subset?






general-topology compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 5 '18 at 4:25
















0












$begingroup$


Prove that if $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets of a Hausdorff space $X$, then $K cap L$ is a compact subset of $X$.



I understand that since $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets, they each have finite coverings. Do I have to show that the intersection of $2$ finite coverings is a compact subset?






general-topology compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 5 '18 at 4:25














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Prove that if $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets of a Hausdorff space $X$, then $K cap L$ is a compact subset of $X$.



I understand that since $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets, they each have finite coverings. Do I have to show that the intersection of $2$ finite coverings is a compact subset?






general-topology compactness







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Prove that if $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets of a Hausdorff space $X$, then $K cap L$ is a compact subset of $X$.



I understand that since $K$ and $L$ are compact subsets, they each have finite coverings. Do I have to show that the intersection of $2$ finite coverings is a compact subset?






general-topology compactness




general-topology compactness






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 20:33









Davide Giraudo

127k16151265




127k16151265










asked Dec 5 '18 at 4:09









general1597general1597

313




313








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 5 '18 at 4:25














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 5 '18 at 4:25








1




1




$begingroup$
Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 5 '18 at 4:25




$begingroup$
Hint: $K$ and $L$ must be closed sets and $K cap L subseteq K$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 5 '18 at 4:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$


Theorem:Any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.




You can find a proof here.



Let $mathcal{A}$ be an open cover of $K cap L$. Since $K$ and $L$ are closed sets ,$K cap L$ is also closed. So ${(K cap L)}^C$ is open. Then $mathcal{B}=mathcal{A}cup {(K cap L)}^C$ is an open cover of $K$(and $L$). Since $K$ is compact,$mathcal{B}$ has a finite subcover,say,${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n,{(K cap L)}^C}$. So ${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}$ is a finite subcover of $mathcal{A}$ that covers $K cap L$. Hence, $K cap L$ is compact.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 5 '18 at 6:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Dec 5 '18 at 9:04








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026608%2fintersection-of-two-compact-subsets-in-a-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$


Theorem:Any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.




You can find a proof here.



Let $mathcal{A}$ be an open cover of $K cap L$. Since $K$ and $L$ are closed sets ,$K cap L$ is also closed. So ${(K cap L)}^C$ is open. Then $mathcal{B}=mathcal{A}cup {(K cap L)}^C$ is an open cover of $K$(and $L$). Since $K$ is compact,$mathcal{B}$ has a finite subcover,say,${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n,{(K cap L)}^C}$. So ${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}$ is a finite subcover of $mathcal{A}$ that covers $K cap L$. Hence, $K cap L$ is compact.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 5 '18 at 6:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Dec 5 '18 at 9:04








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:11
















0












$begingroup$


Theorem:Any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.




You can find a proof here.



Let $mathcal{A}$ be an open cover of $K cap L$. Since $K$ and $L$ are closed sets ,$K cap L$ is also closed. So ${(K cap L)}^C$ is open. Then $mathcal{B}=mathcal{A}cup {(K cap L)}^C$ is an open cover of $K$(and $L$). Since $K$ is compact,$mathcal{B}$ has a finite subcover,say,${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n,{(K cap L)}^C}$. So ${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}$ is a finite subcover of $mathcal{A}$ that covers $K cap L$. Hence, $K cap L$ is compact.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 5 '18 at 6:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Dec 5 '18 at 9:04








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:11














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Theorem:Any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.




You can find a proof here.



Let $mathcal{A}$ be an open cover of $K cap L$. Since $K$ and $L$ are closed sets ,$K cap L$ is also closed. So ${(K cap L)}^C$ is open. Then $mathcal{B}=mathcal{A}cup {(K cap L)}^C$ is an open cover of $K$(and $L$). Since $K$ is compact,$mathcal{B}$ has a finite subcover,say,${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n,{(K cap L)}^C}$. So ${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}$ is a finite subcover of $mathcal{A}$ that covers $K cap L$. Hence, $K cap L$ is compact.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




Theorem:Any compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed.




You can find a proof here.



Let $mathcal{A}$ be an open cover of $K cap L$. Since $K$ and $L$ are closed sets ,$K cap L$ is also closed. So ${(K cap L)}^C$ is open. Then $mathcal{B}=mathcal{A}cup {(K cap L)}^C$ is an open cover of $K$(and $L$). Since $K$ is compact,$mathcal{B}$ has a finite subcover,say,${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n,{(K cap L)}^C}$. So ${A_1,A_2,ldots,A_n}$ is a finite subcover of $mathcal{A}$ that covers $K cap L$. Hence, $K cap L$ is compact.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 5 '18 at 5:03









Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby

3,7192525




3,7192525












  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 5 '18 at 6:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Dec 5 '18 at 9:04








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:11


















  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 5 '18 at 6:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Dec 5 '18 at 9:04








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
    $endgroup$
    – user198044
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:11
















$begingroup$
Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 5 '18 at 6:19






$begingroup$
Why don't you have 2 cases to account for whether or not $(Kcap L)^C$ is included in the finite subcover?
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 5 '18 at 6:19






1




1




$begingroup$
@JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Dec 5 '18 at 9:04






$begingroup$
@JackBauer Even if $(Kcap L)^C $ is not included in the finite subcover, still the union of that subcover and $(Kcap L)^C $ will cover $K$, right? So basically I was trying to incorporate the two cases into one by taking the above mentioned subcover. If there is any mistake , please let me know.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Dec 5 '18 at 9:04






1




1




$begingroup$
I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 12 '18 at 20:11




$begingroup$
I didn't analyze anymore, but if you did "incorporate the two cases", then that's brilliant.
$endgroup$
– user198044
Dec 12 '18 at 20:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026608%2fintersection-of-two-compact-subsets-in-a-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Image
3 Recently upgrade to 18.10 from 18.04, and using the terminal is becoming annoying: the new alert sound is a drip ( /usr/share/sounds/gnome/default/alerts/drip.ogg ), and the previous one is still located at ( /usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg ). My issue is that at the gnome-terminal, when autocompleting or pressing left BOTH sounds are reproduced, at the same time. I want to just have ubuntu/stereo/bell.ogg active, not both . At the moment I have been only able to reduce the volume of the alerts (but still both are played), or turn the alerts down (but I dislike both "solutions"). gnome-terminal 18.10 teminal-bell share | improve this question
Read more

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?

Image
0 I want to add Tabulator js to my java project. I added tabulator.min.js, tabulator.min.css to resources folder. After that added to my html page these dependencies as recommending in readme.md. <link rel="stylesheet" th:href="@{/css/tabulator.min.css}"> <script type="text/javascript" th:src="@{/js/tabulator.min.js}"></script> Now my tables view all elements, that I have in the html page, but not correct. In the documentation of Tabulator is example how to create header and table, var table = new Tabulator("#example-table", { columns:[ {title:"Name", field:"name", sorter:"string", width:200, editor:true}, {title:"Age", field:"age", sorter:"
Read more

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Image
up vote 5 down vote favorite 2 I would like to make it so that the vertical space below the title of each chapter is the same when using the Bjornstrup package (i.e. so that the descenders do not affect the spacing - as shown by the red arrow in the picture below). I think I'm fairly happy with the spacing around "A chapter", so I'd really like titles without descenders (e.g. "Contents") to have the same vertical spacing as "A chapter" below the title. I would also like to remove the large "0" in the contents title. Any help appreciated, as always. documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{book} % Packages[![enter image description here][1]][1] usepackage[left=3.5cm, right=3.5cm, top=4.3cm, bottom=4.25cm]{geometry} usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} usepackage{libertine} usepackage[libertine]{newtx
Read more