How can I prove non-geometrically that there is a bijective correspondence between polar and cartesian...












1












$begingroup$


We have a function $f: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $f(x,y) = (sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$, $tan^{-1}left(frac{y}{x}right))$ which takes a Cartesian pair $(x,y)$ to its polar form, and a function $g: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $g(r,theta) = (rcostheta, rsintheta)$, which takes a polar pair $(r, theta)$ to its Cartesian representation.



I'm having trouble proving that there's a bijective correspondence between the two representations. It is easy to show, for instance, that $f circ g = text{id}_{mathbb{R}^2}$, but not quite as easy to show the other direction.



Any hints or help would be appreciated.



--



Edit: I have also tried messing around with injectivity and surjectivity between the two functions, so that the one-way composition-identity equality suffices to prove that the two functions are inverses. But I run into the same problems, which the below answer resolves by using trig identities. Is there a way to circumvent this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
    $endgroup$
    – pjs36
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:53
















1












$begingroup$


We have a function $f: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $f(x,y) = (sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$, $tan^{-1}left(frac{y}{x}right))$ which takes a Cartesian pair $(x,y)$ to its polar form, and a function $g: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $g(r,theta) = (rcostheta, rsintheta)$, which takes a polar pair $(r, theta)$ to its Cartesian representation.



I'm having trouble proving that there's a bijective correspondence between the two representations. It is easy to show, for instance, that $f circ g = text{id}_{mathbb{R}^2}$, but not quite as easy to show the other direction.



Any hints or help would be appreciated.



--



Edit: I have also tried messing around with injectivity and surjectivity between the two functions, so that the one-way composition-identity equality suffices to prove that the two functions are inverses. But I run into the same problems, which the below answer resolves by using trig identities. Is there a way to circumvent this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
    $endgroup$
    – pjs36
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:53














1












1








1





$begingroup$


We have a function $f: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $f(x,y) = (sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$, $tan^{-1}left(frac{y}{x}right))$ which takes a Cartesian pair $(x,y)$ to its polar form, and a function $g: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $g(r,theta) = (rcostheta, rsintheta)$, which takes a polar pair $(r, theta)$ to its Cartesian representation.



I'm having trouble proving that there's a bijective correspondence between the two representations. It is easy to show, for instance, that $f circ g = text{id}_{mathbb{R}^2}$, but not quite as easy to show the other direction.



Any hints or help would be appreciated.



--



Edit: I have also tried messing around with injectivity and surjectivity between the two functions, so that the one-way composition-identity equality suffices to prove that the two functions are inverses. But I run into the same problems, which the below answer resolves by using trig identities. Is there a way to circumvent this?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We have a function $f: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $f(x,y) = (sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$, $tan^{-1}left(frac{y}{x}right))$ which takes a Cartesian pair $(x,y)$ to its polar form, and a function $g: mathbb{R}^2 rightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ as $g(r,theta) = (rcostheta, rsintheta)$, which takes a polar pair $(r, theta)$ to its Cartesian representation.



I'm having trouble proving that there's a bijective correspondence between the two representations. It is easy to show, for instance, that $f circ g = text{id}_{mathbb{R}^2}$, but not quite as easy to show the other direction.



Any hints or help would be appreciated.



--



Edit: I have also tried messing around with injectivity and surjectivity between the two functions, so that the one-way composition-identity equality suffices to prove that the two functions are inverses. But I run into the same problems, which the below answer resolves by using trig identities. Is there a way to circumvent this?







coordinate-systems polar-coordinates






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 21 '15 at 21:04







jwalk

















asked Feb 21 '15 at 20:41









jwalkjwalk

1266




1266












  • $begingroup$
    Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
    $endgroup$
    – pjs36
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:53


















  • $begingroup$
    Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
    $endgroup$
    – pjs36
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:42










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:45










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
    $endgroup$
    – copper.hat
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:53
















$begingroup$
Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– pjs36
Feb 21 '15 at 20:42




$begingroup$
Have you restricted $r$ and $theta$ at all?
$endgroup$
– pjs36
Feb 21 '15 at 20:42












$begingroup$
Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
$endgroup$
– jwalk
Feb 21 '15 at 20:44




$begingroup$
Yes, I also have assumed that $rge 0$ and $-pi < theta < pi$.
$endgroup$
– jwalk
Feb 21 '15 at 20:44




1




1




$begingroup$
There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Feb 21 '15 at 20:45




$begingroup$
There is no bijective correspondence if you allow $r=0$. If $r=0$ then $theta$ can be anything without changing the point.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Feb 21 '15 at 20:45












$begingroup$
The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Feb 21 '15 at 20:45




$begingroup$
The function is not defined for $x=0$. You need to use something like $operatorname{arg}$ (or $operatorname{atan2}$) instead, and you need to remove $(0,0)$ from the domain.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Feb 21 '15 at 20:45












$begingroup$
Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Feb 21 '15 at 20:53




$begingroup$
Note that the way $f_2$ is defined does not distinguish between $(x,y)$ and $-(x,y)$.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Feb 21 '15 at 20:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Substitute $r= sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $theta = arctan(frac{y}{x})$ into $g$ and use the Relations for inverse trigonometric functions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:51











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1159257%2fhow-can-i-prove-non-geometrically-that-there-is-a-bijective-correspondence-betwe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Substitute $r= sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $theta = arctan(frac{y}{x})$ into $g$ and use the Relations for inverse trigonometric functions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:51
















2












$begingroup$

Substitute $r= sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $theta = arctan(frac{y}{x})$ into $g$ and use the Relations for inverse trigonometric functions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Substitute $r= sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $theta = arctan(frac{y}{x})$ into $g$ and use the Relations for inverse trigonometric functions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Substitute $r= sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $theta = arctan(frac{y}{x})$ into $g$ and use the Relations for inverse trigonometric functions.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 21 '15 at 20:46









kryomaximkryomaxim

2,3621825




2,3621825












  • $begingroup$
    Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:51


















  • $begingroup$
    Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – jwalk
    Feb 21 '15 at 20:51
















$begingroup$
Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jwalk
Feb 21 '15 at 20:51




$begingroup$
Amazing! Though, that sure was not worth spending hours trying to figure out. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jwalk
Feb 21 '15 at 20:51


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1159257%2fhow-can-i-prove-non-geometrically-that-there-is-a-bijective-correspondence-betwe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to send String Array data to Server using php in android

Title Spacing in Bjornstrup Chapter, Removing Chapter Number From Contents

Is anime1.com a legal site for watching anime?