How does this example from Spivak that $H_c^n(mathbb R^n) ne 0$?
$begingroup$
I am not sure how this integral that is being calculated using Stoke's theorem shows that the $n$th de Rham cohomology group with compact supports of $mathbb R^n$ is not trivial.
How does the fact that the integral of $omega$ over $mathbb R^n$ is zero show that $H_c^n(mathbb R^n) ne 0$?
differential-geometry proof-explanation differential-topology homology-cohomology de-rham-cohomology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not sure how this integral that is being calculated using Stoke's theorem shows that the $n$th de Rham cohomology group with compact supports of $mathbb R^n$ is not trivial.
How does the fact that the integral of $omega$ over $mathbb R^n$ is zero show that $H_c^n(mathbb R^n) ne 0$?
differential-geometry proof-explanation differential-topology homology-cohomology de-rham-cohomology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not sure how this integral that is being calculated using Stoke's theorem shows that the $n$th de Rham cohomology group with compact supports of $mathbb R^n$ is not trivial.
How does the fact that the integral of $omega$ over $mathbb R^n$ is zero show that $H_c^n(mathbb R^n) ne 0$?
differential-geometry proof-explanation differential-topology homology-cohomology de-rham-cohomology
$endgroup$
I am not sure how this integral that is being calculated using Stoke's theorem shows that the $n$th de Rham cohomology group with compact supports of $mathbb R^n$ is not trivial.
How does the fact that the integral of $omega$ over $mathbb R^n$ is zero show that $H_c^n(mathbb R^n) ne 0$?
differential-geometry proof-explanation differential-topology homology-cohomology de-rham-cohomology
differential-geometry proof-explanation differential-topology homology-cohomology de-rham-cohomology
asked Dec 10 '18 at 23:28
Al JebrAl Jebr
4,37443378
4,37443378
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $mathbf R^n$ has dimension $n$ and $omega$ is an $n$-form, we have that $omega$ has to be closed (as there are no nontrivial $(n+1)$-forms on $mathbf R^n$). Hence $omegain Z_c^n(mathbf R^n)$. But $omeganotin B_c^n(mathbf R^n)$ because we'd would have $eta$ with compact support such that $omega=deta$, and that would imply that $int_{mathbf R^n} omega =0$ as Spivak claims. This is a contradiction because $omega$ is non-negative and positive at some point (hence on a neighborhood of that point by continuity). Hence $omega$ is a nonzero element of $H_c^n(mathbf R^n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034638%2fhow-does-this-example-from-spivak-that-h-cn-mathbb-rn-ne-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $mathbf R^n$ has dimension $n$ and $omega$ is an $n$-form, we have that $omega$ has to be closed (as there are no nontrivial $(n+1)$-forms on $mathbf R^n$). Hence $omegain Z_c^n(mathbf R^n)$. But $omeganotin B_c^n(mathbf R^n)$ because we'd would have $eta$ with compact support such that $omega=deta$, and that would imply that $int_{mathbf R^n} omega =0$ as Spivak claims. This is a contradiction because $omega$ is non-negative and positive at some point (hence on a neighborhood of that point by continuity). Hence $omega$ is a nonzero element of $H_c^n(mathbf R^n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $mathbf R^n$ has dimension $n$ and $omega$ is an $n$-form, we have that $omega$ has to be closed (as there are no nontrivial $(n+1)$-forms on $mathbf R^n$). Hence $omegain Z_c^n(mathbf R^n)$. But $omeganotin B_c^n(mathbf R^n)$ because we'd would have $eta$ with compact support such that $omega=deta$, and that would imply that $int_{mathbf R^n} omega =0$ as Spivak claims. This is a contradiction because $omega$ is non-negative and positive at some point (hence on a neighborhood of that point by continuity). Hence $omega$ is a nonzero element of $H_c^n(mathbf R^n)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $mathbf R^n$ has dimension $n$ and $omega$ is an $n$-form, we have that $omega$ has to be closed (as there are no nontrivial $(n+1)$-forms on $mathbf R^n$). Hence $omegain Z_c^n(mathbf R^n)$. But $omeganotin B_c^n(mathbf R^n)$ because we'd would have $eta$ with compact support such that $omega=deta$, and that would imply that $int_{mathbf R^n} omega =0$ as Spivak claims. This is a contradiction because $omega$ is non-negative and positive at some point (hence on a neighborhood of that point by continuity). Hence $omega$ is a nonzero element of $H_c^n(mathbf R^n)$.
$endgroup$
Since $mathbf R^n$ has dimension $n$ and $omega$ is an $n$-form, we have that $omega$ has to be closed (as there are no nontrivial $(n+1)$-forms on $mathbf R^n$). Hence $omegain Z_c^n(mathbf R^n)$. But $omeganotin B_c^n(mathbf R^n)$ because we'd would have $eta$ with compact support such that $omega=deta$, and that would imply that $int_{mathbf R^n} omega =0$ as Spivak claims. This is a contradiction because $omega$ is non-negative and positive at some point (hence on a neighborhood of that point by continuity). Hence $omega$ is a nonzero element of $H_c^n(mathbf R^n)$.
answered Dec 10 '18 at 23:40
ZirchtZircht
1,623913
1,623913
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
$begingroup$
Why is $int_{partial mathbb R^n} eta =0$?
$endgroup$
– Al Jebr
Dec 11 '18 at 0:34
1
1
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
@AlJebr It's because $partial mathbf R^n = emptyset$.
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 11 '18 at 0:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034638%2fhow-does-this-example-from-spivak-that-h-cn-mathbb-rn-ne-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown