Zombie process actually slowing system down ~100 fold
I was using vlc and started up another vlc which did not actually start.
System became slow. I checked top and noticed that vlc had become a zombie.
top was showing vlc to be 99-101% cpu which was changing in value but near 100%. I could not open up a Qterminal. I decided to read up on zombie processes. I noted that people were saying cpu may read 100% but actual resources would not be used. Memory in top did show zero for vlc zombie.
I tried to renice to 39 which top shown was done.
The system was about 100 times as slow as normal. I decided to open up lightweight terminal rvxt and sudo reboot. After one minute no change in the screen so I did a hard power restart.
What should I do to collect more information and how can I monitor this to produce data for say a bug report?
Lubuntu: LXQT : Laptop HP Pavilion dv9000 2Gb Ram
Linux ub2 4.18.0-10-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 11 15:13:55 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cpu zombie
add a comment |
I was using vlc and started up another vlc which did not actually start.
System became slow. I checked top and noticed that vlc had become a zombie.
top was showing vlc to be 99-101% cpu which was changing in value but near 100%. I could not open up a Qterminal. I decided to read up on zombie processes. I noted that people were saying cpu may read 100% but actual resources would not be used. Memory in top did show zero for vlc zombie.
I tried to renice to 39 which top shown was done.
The system was about 100 times as slow as normal. I decided to open up lightweight terminal rvxt and sudo reboot. After one minute no change in the screen so I did a hard power restart.
What should I do to collect more information and how can I monitor this to produce data for say a bug report?
Lubuntu: LXQT : Laptop HP Pavilion dv9000 2Gb Ram
Linux ub2 4.18.0-10-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 11 15:13:55 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cpu zombie
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16
add a comment |
I was using vlc and started up another vlc which did not actually start.
System became slow. I checked top and noticed that vlc had become a zombie.
top was showing vlc to be 99-101% cpu which was changing in value but near 100%. I could not open up a Qterminal. I decided to read up on zombie processes. I noted that people were saying cpu may read 100% but actual resources would not be used. Memory in top did show zero for vlc zombie.
I tried to renice to 39 which top shown was done.
The system was about 100 times as slow as normal. I decided to open up lightweight terminal rvxt and sudo reboot. After one minute no change in the screen so I did a hard power restart.
What should I do to collect more information and how can I monitor this to produce data for say a bug report?
Lubuntu: LXQT : Laptop HP Pavilion dv9000 2Gb Ram
Linux ub2 4.18.0-10-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 11 15:13:55 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cpu zombie
I was using vlc and started up another vlc which did not actually start.
System became slow. I checked top and noticed that vlc had become a zombie.
top was showing vlc to be 99-101% cpu which was changing in value but near 100%. I could not open up a Qterminal. I decided to read up on zombie processes. I noted that people were saying cpu may read 100% but actual resources would not be used. Memory in top did show zero for vlc zombie.
I tried to renice to 39 which top shown was done.
The system was about 100 times as slow as normal. I decided to open up lightweight terminal rvxt and sudo reboot. After one minute no change in the screen so I did a hard power restart.
What should I do to collect more information and how can I monitor this to produce data for say a bug report?
Lubuntu: LXQT : Laptop HP Pavilion dv9000 2Gb Ram
Linux ub2 4.18.0-10-generic #11-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 11 15:13:55 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cpu zombie
cpu zombie
edited Jan 3 at 13:22
Keith5001
asked Jan 3 at 12:58
Keith5001Keith5001
13
13
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16
add a comment |
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1106571%2fzombie-process-actually-slowing-system-down-100-fold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1106571%2fzombie-process-actually-slowing-system-down-100-fold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Should vlc be started that way?
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 13:49
Good point, I did not say how I started vlc. I started vlc from the spacefm file manager by opening a video file. Vlc preferences can allow more than one instance.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:02
Then that's perhaps a bug report!
– George Udosen
Jan 3 at 14:05
Yes the zombie might only happen on a 2nd or more vlc starting. I was concerned that the greater bug is in the OS as zombie processes according to my understanding should have zero resource use. Not only was the process at 100% but the scheduler was not controlling the process either. The process was acting in real time scheduling mode and effectively locking resources or at least slowing them down. As I said was unable to soft reboot.
– Keith5001
Jan 3 at 14:16