I cannot run any executable from nautilus
With Ubuntu 18.04 have a problem. When compiling something, the executable binary is showed as shared-library in Nautilus.
When double clicked any executable file, I got the following message
"There is no application installed for "shared library" ......
18.04 executable
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 18.04 have a problem. When compiling something, the executable binary is showed as shared-library in Nautilus.
When double clicked any executable file, I got the following message
"There is no application installed for "shared library" ......
18.04 executable
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
1
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
1
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28
add a comment |
With Ubuntu 18.04 have a problem. When compiling something, the executable binary is showed as shared-library in Nautilus.
When double clicked any executable file, I got the following message
"There is no application installed for "shared library" ......
18.04 executable
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
With Ubuntu 18.04 have a problem. When compiling something, the executable binary is showed as shared-library in Nautilus.
When double clicked any executable file, I got the following message
"There is no application installed for "shared library" ......
18.04 executable
18.04 executable
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
edited Jul 17 '18 at 12:43
John Puskin
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
asked Jul 17 '18 at 12:23
John PuskinJohn Puskin
62
62
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
1
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
1
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28
add a comment |
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
1
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
1
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
1
1
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
1
1
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you can't try non-extension of Ubuntu 18.04 - It looks like it doesn't work for the newest version. I think it works fine with *.sh because sometimes there's a copy violation of MacOS's shell or non-extension-able executable.
I have tried normal executable under Ubuntu 18.04, then you can replace yourapp with yourapp.sh then you can click yourapp.sh, then it will open the application.
PS: Please remember that for Ubuntu 18.04 need all replacement of yourapp"*" to yourapp".sh" - If system-engine-used binaries because it used by $PATH and any binaries like cp, rm etc don't need *.sh just let. If you are not sure for executable and shell format.
I hope you have tried to open executable and shell.
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1056882%2fi-cannot-run-any-executable-from-nautilus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you can't try non-extension of Ubuntu 18.04 - It looks like it doesn't work for the newest version. I think it works fine with *.sh because sometimes there's a copy violation of MacOS's shell or non-extension-able executable.
I have tried normal executable under Ubuntu 18.04, then you can replace yourapp with yourapp.sh then you can click yourapp.sh, then it will open the application.
PS: Please remember that for Ubuntu 18.04 need all replacement of yourapp"*" to yourapp".sh" - If system-engine-used binaries because it used by $PATH and any binaries like cp, rm etc don't need *.sh just let. If you are not sure for executable and shell format.
I hope you have tried to open executable and shell.
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
add a comment |
If you can't try non-extension of Ubuntu 18.04 - It looks like it doesn't work for the newest version. I think it works fine with *.sh because sometimes there's a copy violation of MacOS's shell or non-extension-able executable.
I have tried normal executable under Ubuntu 18.04, then you can replace yourapp with yourapp.sh then you can click yourapp.sh, then it will open the application.
PS: Please remember that for Ubuntu 18.04 need all replacement of yourapp"*" to yourapp".sh" - If system-engine-used binaries because it used by $PATH and any binaries like cp, rm etc don't need *.sh just let. If you are not sure for executable and shell format.
I hope you have tried to open executable and shell.
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
add a comment |
If you can't try non-extension of Ubuntu 18.04 - It looks like it doesn't work for the newest version. I think it works fine with *.sh because sometimes there's a copy violation of MacOS's shell or non-extension-able executable.
I have tried normal executable under Ubuntu 18.04, then you can replace yourapp with yourapp.sh then you can click yourapp.sh, then it will open the application.
PS: Please remember that for Ubuntu 18.04 need all replacement of yourapp"*" to yourapp".sh" - If system-engine-used binaries because it used by $PATH and any binaries like cp, rm etc don't need *.sh just let. If you are not sure for executable and shell format.
I hope you have tried to open executable and shell.
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
If you can't try non-extension of Ubuntu 18.04 - It looks like it doesn't work for the newest version. I think it works fine with *.sh because sometimes there's a copy violation of MacOS's shell or non-extension-able executable.
I have tried normal executable under Ubuntu 18.04, then you can replace yourapp with yourapp.sh then you can click yourapp.sh, then it will open the application.
PS: Please remember that for Ubuntu 18.04 need all replacement of yourapp"*" to yourapp".sh" - If system-engine-used binaries because it used by $PATH and any binaries like cp, rm etc don't need *.sh just let. If you are not sure for executable and shell format.
I hope you have tried to open executable and shell.
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
edited Jan 3 at 14:06
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
answered Oct 8 '18 at 12:33
Jens EckervogtJens Eckervogt
415
415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1056882%2fi-cannot-run-any-executable-from-nautilus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
However in terminal, I can run whatever I want.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:24
No. Nautilus sees executable as shared library. When double-clicked, it says, "There is no application installed for "shared library" ...... "
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:41
1
askubuntu.com/a/929483/15811
– Rinzwind
Jul 17 '18 at 12:50
1
-fno-pic -no-pie is the solutlion. Thanx.
– John Puskin
Jul 17 '18 at 12:55
Hi John! Pease add an answer for your solution. Is it a Qt (qmake) specific problem?
– abu_bua
Jul 17 '18 at 13:28