Reducing time complexity in comparing contiguous subarrays?
So say I have a list sequences such as this.
I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.
For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.
lst = [
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]
E.g.
Input: 4 3
Output: 2 1 2
So what I have right now is
lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]
Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?
python-3.x
add a comment |
So say I have a list sequences such as this.
I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.
For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.
lst = [
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]
E.g.
Input: 4 3
Output: 2 1 2
So what I have right now is
lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]
Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?
python-3.x
add a comment |
So say I have a list sequences such as this.
I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.
For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.
lst = [
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]
E.g.
Input: 4 3
Output: 2 1 2
So what I have right now is
lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]
Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?
python-3.x
So say I have a list sequences such as this.
I want to remove all sequences where its total sum = N and/or it has a contiguous subarray with sum = N.
For example, if N = 4, then (1,1,2) is not valid since its total is 4. (1,1,3) is also not valid since the (1,3) is also 4. (1,3,1) is also not valid for the same reason.
lst = [
(1,1,1), (1,1,2), (1,1,3),
(1,2,1), (1,2,2), (1,2,3),
(1,3,1), (1,3,2), (1,3,3),
(2,1,1), (2,1,2), (2,1,3),
(2,2,1), (2,2,2), (2,2,3),
(2,3,1), (2,3,2), (2,3,3),
(3,1,1), (3,1,2), (3,1,3),
(3,2,1), (3,2,2), (3,2,3),
(3,3,1), (3,3,2), (3,3,3)
]
E.g.
Input: 4 3
Output: 2 1 2
So what I have right now is
lst = [t for t in list(product(range(1,n),repeat=n-1)) if not any((sum(t[l:h+1]) % n == 0) for l, h in combinations(range(len(t)), 2))]
Currently it is in O(n2) if I'm not mistaken. What would be a better way to do this?
python-3.x
python-3.x
asked Nov 19 '18 at 23:59
ThegreatfooThegreatfoo
385
385
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you can use numpy
, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:
arr = np.array(lst)
arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
# or:
arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]
Returning:
array([[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 1, 2],
[2, 3, 2],
[2, 3, 3],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 3],
[3, 3, 2],
[3, 3, 3]])
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384351%2freducing-time-complexity-in-comparing-contiguous-subarrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you can use numpy
, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:
arr = np.array(lst)
arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
# or:
arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]
Returning:
array([[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 1, 2],
[2, 3, 2],
[2, 3, 3],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 3],
[3, 3, 2],
[3, 3, 3]])
add a comment |
If you can use numpy
, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:
arr = np.array(lst)
arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
# or:
arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]
Returning:
array([[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 1, 2],
[2, 3, 2],
[2, 3, 3],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 3],
[3, 3, 2],
[3, 3, 3]])
add a comment |
If you can use numpy
, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:
arr = np.array(lst)
arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
# or:
arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]
Returning:
array([[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 1, 2],
[2, 3, 2],
[2, 3, 3],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 3],
[3, 3, 2],
[3, 3, 3]])
If you can use numpy
, you can concatenate the total sum of each tuple with the contiguous value sums, then check if any of your resultign elements are equal to 4:
arr = np.array(lst)
arr[~(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) == 4).any(1)]
# or:
arr[(np.concatenate((np.sum(arr,axis=1).reshape(-1,1),
(arr[:,:-1]+ arr[:,1:])),axis=1) != 4).all(1)]
Returning:
array([[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 1, 2],
[2, 3, 2],
[2, 3, 3],
[3, 2, 1],
[3, 2, 3],
[3, 3, 2],
[3, 3, 3]])
answered Nov 20 '18 at 0:08
sacuLsacuL
30.1k41940
30.1k41940
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53384351%2freducing-time-complexity-in-comparing-contiguous-subarrays%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown