Function isn't being called in Node Js using REST API
I am writing a code in Node JS, which uses mustache for templating html and REST API as backend.
Here is my code that doesn't work.
function setupRoutes(app) {
const base = app.locals.base;
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
}
function doSearchContent(app) {
return async function(req, res) {
console.log("here");
}; };
When I run my program and go to base/search.html. It never calls the doSearchContent method.
Any idea why and how I can fix this?
EDIT: The doGetContent works as expected. It's when I run the search.html it doesn't
node.js rest
add a comment |
I am writing a code in Node JS, which uses mustache for templating html and REST API as backend.
Here is my code that doesn't work.
function setupRoutes(app) {
const base = app.locals.base;
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
}
function doSearchContent(app) {
return async function(req, res) {
console.log("here");
}; };
When I run my program and go to base/search.html. It never calls the doSearchContent method.
Any idea why and how I can fix this?
EDIT: The doGetContent works as expected. It's when I run the search.html it doesn't
node.js rest
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49
add a comment |
I am writing a code in Node JS, which uses mustache for templating html and REST API as backend.
Here is my code that doesn't work.
function setupRoutes(app) {
const base = app.locals.base;
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
}
function doSearchContent(app) {
return async function(req, res) {
console.log("here");
}; };
When I run my program and go to base/search.html. It never calls the doSearchContent method.
Any idea why and how I can fix this?
EDIT: The doGetContent works as expected. It's when I run the search.html it doesn't
node.js rest
I am writing a code in Node JS, which uses mustache for templating html and REST API as backend.
Here is my code that doesn't work.
function setupRoutes(app) {
const base = app.locals.base;
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
}
function doSearchContent(app) {
return async function(req, res) {
console.log("here");
}; };
When I run my program and go to base/search.html. It never calls the doSearchContent method.
Any idea why and how I can fix this?
EDIT: The doGetContent works as expected. It's when I run the search.html it doesn't
node.js rest
node.js rest
edited Nov 18 '18 at 15:55
Mike Ross
asked Nov 18 '18 at 4:41
Mike RossMike Ross
112
112
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49
add a comment |
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The express paths should be started with a leading slash. Please change your routes addition to something like this:
...
app.get(`/${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`/${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
...
Express matches the path of http request against the 'path' provided for all routes to decide which routes must be called. Since the http paths always start with a slash, your routes also must specify those to match.
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
add a comment |
These lines
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
are not working as you expect. In Express routes we don't invoke functions directly. Instead, we either pass a name of a callback fucntion to invoke, that receives req
and res
params, or an anonymous callback. In your case it could be something like this:
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,(req, res) => {
console.log("It's alive!");
doSearchContent(app);
});
app.get(`${base}/:name`, (req, res) => {
doGetContent(app)
});
The express paths should be started with a leading slash.
This is not true
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes withapp.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
Have you added search.html file or used a template to build the HTML?
Make sure the template is being called and not the html file.
Other than that your code looks fine and it should work
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53357965%2ffunction-isnt-being-called-in-node-js-using-rest-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The express paths should be started with a leading slash. Please change your routes addition to something like this:
...
app.get(`/${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`/${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
...
Express matches the path of http request against the 'path' provided for all routes to decide which routes must be called. Since the http paths always start with a slash, your routes also must specify those to match.
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
add a comment |
The express paths should be started with a leading slash. Please change your routes addition to something like this:
...
app.get(`/${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`/${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
...
Express matches the path of http request against the 'path' provided for all routes to decide which routes must be called. Since the http paths always start with a slash, your routes also must specify those to match.
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
add a comment |
The express paths should be started with a leading slash. Please change your routes addition to something like this:
...
app.get(`/${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`/${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
...
Express matches the path of http request against the 'path' provided for all routes to decide which routes must be called. Since the http paths always start with a slash, your routes also must specify those to match.
The express paths should be started with a leading slash. Please change your routes addition to something like this:
...
app.get(`/${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`/${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
...
Express matches the path of http request against the 'path' provided for all routes to decide which routes must be called. Since the http paths always start with a slash, your routes also must specify those to match.
answered Nov 18 '18 at 7:07
elem4thelem4th
55727
55727
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
add a comment |
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
the thing is doGetContent works as expected.
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
add a comment |
These lines
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
are not working as you expect. In Express routes we don't invoke functions directly. Instead, we either pass a name of a callback fucntion to invoke, that receives req
and res
params, or an anonymous callback. In your case it could be something like this:
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,(req, res) => {
console.log("It's alive!");
doSearchContent(app);
});
app.get(`${base}/:name`, (req, res) => {
doGetContent(app)
});
The express paths should be started with a leading slash.
This is not true
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes withapp.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
These lines
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
are not working as you expect. In Express routes we don't invoke functions directly. Instead, we either pass a name of a callback fucntion to invoke, that receives req
and res
params, or an anonymous callback. In your case it could be something like this:
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,(req, res) => {
console.log("It's alive!");
doSearchContent(app);
});
app.get(`${base}/:name`, (req, res) => {
doGetContent(app)
});
The express paths should be started with a leading slash.
This is not true
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes withapp.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
These lines
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
are not working as you expect. In Express routes we don't invoke functions directly. Instead, we either pass a name of a callback fucntion to invoke, that receives req
and res
params, or an anonymous callback. In your case it could be something like this:
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,(req, res) => {
console.log("It's alive!");
doSearchContent(app);
});
app.get(`${base}/:name`, (req, res) => {
doGetContent(app)
});
The express paths should be started with a leading slash.
This is not true
These lines
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,doSearchContent(app));
app.get(`${base}/:name`,doGetContent(app));
are not working as you expect. In Express routes we don't invoke functions directly. Instead, we either pass a name of a callback fucntion to invoke, that receives req
and res
params, or an anonymous callback. In your case it could be something like this:
app.get(`${base}/search.html`,(req, res) => {
console.log("It's alive!");
doSearchContent(app);
});
app.get(`${base}/:name`, (req, res) => {
doGetContent(app)
});
The express paths should be started with a leading slash.
This is not true
answered Nov 18 '18 at 10:09
Anton PastukhovAnton Pastukhov
1978
1978
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes withapp.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes withapp.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
the thing is doGetContent works as expectef
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 15:56
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
I tried using this method. It's alive still isn't being printed
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 16:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
In OP's example, doSearchContent returns a function so this should still work.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 17:01
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert Ideally this should work, that's why I am not sure why it isn't working
– Mike Ross
Nov 18 '18 at 18:35
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes with
app.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs ${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
@Evert yeah, this is indeed an overlook. @Mike Ross in this case you could prepend your routes with
app.use('*', (req, res, next) => { console.log(req.originalUrl); next() })
to check if you actual route matchs ${base}/search.html
– Anton Pastukhov
Nov 18 '18 at 19:53
|
show 1 more comment
Have you added search.html file or used a template to build the HTML?
Make sure the template is being called and not the html file.
Other than that your code looks fine and it should work
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
Have you added search.html file or used a template to build the HTML?
Make sure the template is being called and not the html file.
Other than that your code looks fine and it should work
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
Have you added search.html file or used a template to build the HTML?
Make sure the template is being called and not the html file.
Other than that your code looks fine and it should work
Have you added search.html file or used a template to build the HTML?
Make sure the template is being called and not the html file.
Other than that your code looks fine and it should work
answered Nov 19 '18 at 23:50
Dipesh DesaiDipesh Desai
409
409
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
1
1
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
I had added an html file. Thanks. I made a template file and it works now :)
– Mike Ross
Nov 19 '18 at 23:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53357965%2ffunction-isnt-being-called-in-node-js-using-rest-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you share what framework you are using? You're using some kind of router.
– Evert
Nov 18 '18 at 18:49