WPF chart control for medical software
I am going to rewrite chart from some medical software to WPF. The chart is pretty complex and to save time I decided to use/buy 3rd party control. I understand to answer specifically you need more details but could you advise best WPF chart control from your personal experience.
.net wpf
add a comment |
I am going to rewrite chart from some medical software to WPF. The chart is pretty complex and to save time I decided to use/buy 3rd party control. I understand to answer specifically you need more details but could you advise best WPF chart control from your personal experience.
.net wpf
add a comment |
I am going to rewrite chart from some medical software to WPF. The chart is pretty complex and to save time I decided to use/buy 3rd party control. I understand to answer specifically you need more details but could you advise best WPF chart control from your personal experience.
.net wpf
I am going to rewrite chart from some medical software to WPF. The chart is pretty complex and to save time I decided to use/buy 3rd party control. I understand to answer specifically you need more details but could you advise best WPF chart control from your personal experience.
.net wpf
.net wpf
asked Oct 4 '11 at 8:27
SiberianGuySiberianGuy
6,20136116226
6,20136116226
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Full disclosure: I own SciChart Ltd and was involved in the development of SciChart
Admitedly I am biased, but I have developed a lightweight chart component for precisely this use. There are plenty of choices for WPF chart components, but few that offer truly high performance for scientific or financial use.
As a response to this need, I created a high performance WPF chart component called SciChart. SciChart seeks to fill the gap for ultra high performance scientific / stock charts and as part of its optimisation it uses proprietary resampling algorithms to reduce the dataset before drawing, immediate mode rendering and a host of other optimisations such as object pooling and resource re-use.
Please click on following link to view a performance comparison. The chart is able to draw multiple series totalling 5 or 6-figure point counts at interactive framerates (30FPS depending on hardware). This is equivalent to around 2million datapoints per second.
Best regards,
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
add a comment |
For me Microsoft chart (included in .Net 4.0) is really good and free.
(Microsoft buy Dundas chart, so it's a kind of evolution, the client side is really good but the webcontrol is really limited).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f7645108%2fwpf-chart-control-for-medical-software%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Full disclosure: I own SciChart Ltd and was involved in the development of SciChart
Admitedly I am biased, but I have developed a lightweight chart component for precisely this use. There are plenty of choices for WPF chart components, but few that offer truly high performance for scientific or financial use.
As a response to this need, I created a high performance WPF chart component called SciChart. SciChart seeks to fill the gap for ultra high performance scientific / stock charts and as part of its optimisation it uses proprietary resampling algorithms to reduce the dataset before drawing, immediate mode rendering and a host of other optimisations such as object pooling and resource re-use.
Please click on following link to view a performance comparison. The chart is able to draw multiple series totalling 5 or 6-figure point counts at interactive framerates (30FPS depending on hardware). This is equivalent to around 2million datapoints per second.
Best regards,
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
add a comment |
Full disclosure: I own SciChart Ltd and was involved in the development of SciChart
Admitedly I am biased, but I have developed a lightweight chart component for precisely this use. There are plenty of choices for WPF chart components, but few that offer truly high performance for scientific or financial use.
As a response to this need, I created a high performance WPF chart component called SciChart. SciChart seeks to fill the gap for ultra high performance scientific / stock charts and as part of its optimisation it uses proprietary resampling algorithms to reduce the dataset before drawing, immediate mode rendering and a host of other optimisations such as object pooling and resource re-use.
Please click on following link to view a performance comparison. The chart is able to draw multiple series totalling 5 or 6-figure point counts at interactive framerates (30FPS depending on hardware). This is equivalent to around 2million datapoints per second.
Best regards,
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
add a comment |
Full disclosure: I own SciChart Ltd and was involved in the development of SciChart
Admitedly I am biased, but I have developed a lightweight chart component for precisely this use. There are plenty of choices for WPF chart components, but few that offer truly high performance for scientific or financial use.
As a response to this need, I created a high performance WPF chart component called SciChart. SciChart seeks to fill the gap for ultra high performance scientific / stock charts and as part of its optimisation it uses proprietary resampling algorithms to reduce the dataset before drawing, immediate mode rendering and a host of other optimisations such as object pooling and resource re-use.
Please click on following link to view a performance comparison. The chart is able to draw multiple series totalling 5 or 6-figure point counts at interactive framerates (30FPS depending on hardware). This is equivalent to around 2million datapoints per second.
Best regards,
Full disclosure: I own SciChart Ltd and was involved in the development of SciChart
Admitedly I am biased, but I have developed a lightweight chart component for precisely this use. There are plenty of choices for WPF chart components, but few that offer truly high performance for scientific or financial use.
As a response to this need, I created a high performance WPF chart component called SciChart. SciChart seeks to fill the gap for ultra high performance scientific / stock charts and as part of its optimisation it uses proprietary resampling algorithms to reduce the dataset before drawing, immediate mode rendering and a host of other optimisations such as object pooling and resource re-use.
Please click on following link to view a performance comparison. The chart is able to draw multiple series totalling 5 or 6-figure point counts at interactive framerates (30FPS depending on hardware). This is equivalent to around 2million datapoints per second.
Best regards,
edited Jan 29 '16 at 19:18
answered Dec 21 '11 at 12:50
Dr. ABTDr. ABT
14.9k455124
14.9k455124
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
add a comment |
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
1
1
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
We've been using SciChart for the past 12 months and have been quite pleased.
– Seth
Jun 22 '15 at 8:00
add a comment |
For me Microsoft chart (included in .Net 4.0) is really good and free.
(Microsoft buy Dundas chart, so it's a kind of evolution, the client side is really good but the webcontrol is really limited).
add a comment |
For me Microsoft chart (included in .Net 4.0) is really good and free.
(Microsoft buy Dundas chart, so it's a kind of evolution, the client side is really good but the webcontrol is really limited).
add a comment |
For me Microsoft chart (included in .Net 4.0) is really good and free.
(Microsoft buy Dundas chart, so it's a kind of evolution, the client side is really good but the webcontrol is really limited).
For me Microsoft chart (included in .Net 4.0) is really good and free.
(Microsoft buy Dundas chart, so it's a kind of evolution, the client side is really good but the webcontrol is really limited).
answered Oct 4 '11 at 8:55
ykatchouykatchou
3,44411725
3,44411725
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f7645108%2fwpf-chart-control-for-medical-software%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown