Why would you need a signal generator to receive early satellite transmissions?
$begingroup$
I recently watched, on You Tube, a NOVA program about the British school masters and students who were the first to publish the news that the Soviets had started launching satellites from a new launch site back in 1958. (School Boys Who Cracked the Soviet Secret). Early in the program (about 8:35, if you watch it), one schoolmaster asks another what he would need in order to receive and record the transmissions from the early Soviet satellites. He was told three items were needed: a receiver, a tape recorder, and a signal generator.
Why would you need a signal generator? The program is short on technical information.
Although interested in radio, I am not an expert, so please excuse me if I have asked a dumb question.
receiver satellites oscillator
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I recently watched, on You Tube, a NOVA program about the British school masters and students who were the first to publish the news that the Soviets had started launching satellites from a new launch site back in 1958. (School Boys Who Cracked the Soviet Secret). Early in the program (about 8:35, if you watch it), one schoolmaster asks another what he would need in order to receive and record the transmissions from the early Soviet satellites. He was told three items were needed: a receiver, a tape recorder, and a signal generator.
Why would you need a signal generator? The program is short on technical information.
Although interested in radio, I am not an expert, so please excuse me if I have asked a dumb question.
receiver satellites oscillator
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I recently watched, on You Tube, a NOVA program about the British school masters and students who were the first to publish the news that the Soviets had started launching satellites from a new launch site back in 1958. (School Boys Who Cracked the Soviet Secret). Early in the program (about 8:35, if you watch it), one schoolmaster asks another what he would need in order to receive and record the transmissions from the early Soviet satellites. He was told three items were needed: a receiver, a tape recorder, and a signal generator.
Why would you need a signal generator? The program is short on technical information.
Although interested in radio, I am not an expert, so please excuse me if I have asked a dumb question.
receiver satellites oscillator
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
$endgroup$
I recently watched, on You Tube, a NOVA program about the British school masters and students who were the first to publish the news that the Soviets had started launching satellites from a new launch site back in 1958. (School Boys Who Cracked the Soviet Secret). Early in the program (about 8:35, if you watch it), one schoolmaster asks another what he would need in order to receive and record the transmissions from the early Soviet satellites. He was told three items were needed: a receiver, a tape recorder, and a signal generator.
Why would you need a signal generator? The program is short on technical information.
Although interested in radio, I am not an expert, so please excuse me if I have asked a dumb question.
receiver satellites oscillator
receiver satellites oscillator
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
asked Feb 14 at 13:28
John WarrenJohn Warren
1483
1483
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for the BFO. If you had a ham receiver or transceiver that could tune the correct frequency, switching to CW mode would do the same job, and a few "world" radios (multiband AM/SW sets) had a BFO function.
The BFO makes the unmodulated signal audible by mixing it with another signal at a few hundred Hertz different frequency. The two signals will reinforce and cancel, forming a "beat", and they'll do it at a frequency equal to the difference between the two (or their sum, but the difference is chosen to be in the audio range, while the sum is radio frequency). This "beat frequency" is then filtered out of the mixed RF and amplified by the receiver. This is the same process used to make a radiotelegraphy signal audible, or to reconstruct a Single Side Band audio signal.
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "520"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f12822%2fwhy-would-you-need-a-signal-generator-to-receive-early-satellite-transmissions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for the BFO. If you had a ham receiver or transceiver that could tune the correct frequency, switching to CW mode would do the same job, and a few "world" radios (multiband AM/SW sets) had a BFO function.
The BFO makes the unmodulated signal audible by mixing it with another signal at a few hundred Hertz different frequency. The two signals will reinforce and cancel, forming a "beat", and they'll do it at a frequency equal to the difference between the two (or their sum, but the difference is chosen to be in the audio range, while the sum is radio frequency). This "beat frequency" is then filtered out of the mixed RF and amplified by the receiver. This is the same process used to make a radiotelegraphy signal audible, or to reconstruct a Single Side Band audio signal.
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for the BFO. If you had a ham receiver or transceiver that could tune the correct frequency, switching to CW mode would do the same job, and a few "world" radios (multiband AM/SW sets) had a BFO function.
The BFO makes the unmodulated signal audible by mixing it with another signal at a few hundred Hertz different frequency. The two signals will reinforce and cancel, forming a "beat", and they'll do it at a frequency equal to the difference between the two (or their sum, but the difference is chosen to be in the audio range, while the sum is radio frequency). This "beat frequency" is then filtered out of the mixed RF and amplified by the receiver. This is the same process used to make a radiotelegraphy signal audible, or to reconstruct a Single Side Band audio signal.
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for the BFO. If you had a ham receiver or transceiver that could tune the correct frequency, switching to CW mode would do the same job, and a few "world" radios (multiband AM/SW sets) had a BFO function.
The BFO makes the unmodulated signal audible by mixing it with another signal at a few hundred Hertz different frequency. The two signals will reinforce and cancel, forming a "beat", and they'll do it at a frequency equal to the difference between the two (or their sum, but the difference is chosen to be in the audio range, while the sum is radio frequency). This "beat frequency" is then filtered out of the mixed RF and amplified by the receiver. This is the same process used to make a radiotelegraphy signal audible, or to reconstruct a Single Side Band audio signal.
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
$endgroup$
The earliest Soviet satellites, like Sputnik 1, transmitted what amounted to a CW stream -- just pulsed RF at pretty low power (later Sputniks transmitted data by pulse width modulation, still essentially CW). In order to hear it, you needed a Beat Frequency Oscillator -- a BFO -- and with a common radio receiver, the signal generator was standing in for the BFO. If you had a ham receiver or transceiver that could tune the correct frequency, switching to CW mode would do the same job, and a few "world" radios (multiband AM/SW sets) had a BFO function.
The BFO makes the unmodulated signal audible by mixing it with another signal at a few hundred Hertz different frequency. The two signals will reinforce and cancel, forming a "beat", and they'll do it at a frequency equal to the difference between the two (or their sum, but the difference is chosen to be in the audio range, while the sum is radio frequency). This "beat frequency" is then filtered out of the mixed RF and amplified by the receiver. This is the same process used to make a radiotelegraphy signal audible, or to reconstruct a Single Side Band audio signal.
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
edited Feb 14 at 16:35
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
answered Feb 14 at 13:45
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
43419
43419
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
1
1
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
$begingroup$
You might want to re-phrase "Morse code signal". I can generate Morse code signals with a flashlight, and you wouldn't need a signal generator to receive those. ;-)
$endgroup$
– DevSolar
Feb 14 at 16:12
1
1
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
$begingroup$
@DevSolar Should be clearer now.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 14 at 16:35
1
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
$begingroup$
@Calchas CW=Continuous Wave.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters♦
Feb 15 at 1:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
$begingroup$
@JohnWarren Few if any receivers have a mixing input for the external oscillator, but the generator's signal can be coupled through the receiver's antenna, or injected with a probe if you know your way around the receiver's circuits.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:13
1
1
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
$begingroup$
@Calchas That's as opposed to "damped wave" that was emitted by the earliest spark gap transmitters.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Feb 15 at 12:14
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Amateur Radio Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fham.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f12822%2fwhy-would-you-need-a-signal-generator-to-receive-early-satellite-transmissions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
