Multiple bibliographies using BibTeX and thebibliography?
I'm wondering if it is possible to have multiple bibliography without me needed to update a references.bib file.
I have a main references.bib that contains most of my references, however, since I am combining multiple older latex files together that contain thebibliography environments.
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{lamport94}
Leslie Lamport,
textit{LaTeX: a document preparation system},
Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,
2nd edition,
1994.
end{thebibliography}
I think in the future i will be more consistent in the way I make citations, but I am wondering if there is a way to make both thebibliography and separate bib files work together, or at bare minimum convert thebibliography to valid BibTeX references.
bibliographies
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
add a comment |
I'm wondering if it is possible to have multiple bibliography without me needed to update a references.bib file.
I have a main references.bib that contains most of my references, however, since I am combining multiple older latex files together that contain thebibliography environments.
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{lamport94}
Leslie Lamport,
textit{LaTeX: a document preparation system},
Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,
2nd edition,
1994.
end{thebibliography}
I think in the future i will be more consistent in the way I make citations, but I am wondering if there is a way to make both thebibliography and separate bib files work together, or at bare minimum convert thebibliography to valid BibTeX references.
bibliographies
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
You can just input the oldthebibliographyenvironments in addition to usingbibliography{references}
– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
In theory you can have bothbibliography{...}and athebibliographyenvironment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question thethebibliographyis hidden in a.bblfile and in your question it is explicit in the document).
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51
add a comment |
I'm wondering if it is possible to have multiple bibliography without me needed to update a references.bib file.
I have a main references.bib that contains most of my references, however, since I am combining multiple older latex files together that contain thebibliography environments.
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{lamport94}
Leslie Lamport,
textit{LaTeX: a document preparation system},
Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,
2nd edition,
1994.
end{thebibliography}
I think in the future i will be more consistent in the way I make citations, but I am wondering if there is a way to make both thebibliography and separate bib files work together, or at bare minimum convert thebibliography to valid BibTeX references.
bibliographies
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
I'm wondering if it is possible to have multiple bibliography without me needed to update a references.bib file.
I have a main references.bib that contains most of my references, however, since I am combining multiple older latex files together that contain thebibliography environments.
begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{lamport94}
Leslie Lamport,
textit{LaTeX: a document preparation system},
Addison Wesley, Massachusetts,
2nd edition,
1994.
end{thebibliography}
I think in the future i will be more consistent in the way I make citations, but I am wondering if there is a way to make both thebibliography and separate bib files work together, or at bare minimum convert thebibliography to valid BibTeX references.
bibliographies
bibliographies
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
edited Jan 28 at 6:50
moewe
89.5k10110339
89.5k10110339
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
asked Jan 28 at 5:59
GrandFleetGrandFleet
1788
1788
You can just input the oldthebibliographyenvironments in addition to usingbibliography{references}
– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
In theory you can have bothbibliography{...}and athebibliographyenvironment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question thethebibliographyis hidden in a.bblfile and in your question it is explicit in the document).
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51
add a comment |
You can just input the oldthebibliographyenvironments in addition to usingbibliography{references}
– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
In theory you can have bothbibliography{...}and athebibliographyenvironment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question thethebibliographyis hidden in a.bblfile and in your question it is explicit in the document).
– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51
You can just input the old
thebibliography environments in addition to using bibliography{references}– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
You can just input the old
thebibliography environments in addition to using bibliography{references}– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
In theory you can have both
bibliography{...} and a thebibliography environment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
In theory you can have both
bibliography{...} and a thebibliography environment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question the
thebibliography is hidden in a .bbl file and in your question it is explicit in the document).– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question the
thebibliography is hidden in a .bbl file and in your question it is explicit in the document).– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472181%2fmultiple-bibliographies-using-bibtex-and-thebibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f472181%2fmultiple-bibliographies-using-bibtex-and-thebibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can just input the old
thebibliographyenvironments in addition to usingbibliography{references}– Johannes_B
Jan 28 at 6:01
In theory you can have both
bibliography{...}and athebibliographyenvironment in your document. But by default the numbering in both will start at 1 and it is not easily possible to sort the two to combine into one big bibliography.– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:39
This question is basically a duplicate of tex.stackexchange.com/q/464284/35864 (the only difference being that in the linked question the
thebibliographyis hidden in a.bblfile and in your question it is explicit in the document).– moewe
Jan 28 at 7:40
Thec regular BibTeX procedure produces an thebibliography environment in the bbl file. In your case I would use it and consolidate all the thebibliography into a single one by an easy copy paste in the editor, assuming that there are not to much double that must be fixed by hand. Or if you want to keep them separate, have a look to the multibib package.
– Jhor
Jan 28 at 7:51