Composition in a multicategory
I am trying to figure out how to draw composition in a multicategory using same depiction used in Leinster's book "Higher Operads, Higher Categories". Here is what I am trying to draw:
I did something similar, but I could not do it completely. Here is what I got
documentclass{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix{
a1 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[dd] ar@{-}[dr] & & \
a2 ar@{-}[r] & & ar@{-}[r] & a \
a3 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[ur] & &
}
end{document}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
diagrams xy-pic tikz-cd
add a comment |
I am trying to figure out how to draw composition in a multicategory using same depiction used in Leinster's book "Higher Operads, Higher Categories". Here is what I am trying to draw:
I did something similar, but I could not do it completely. Here is what I got
documentclass{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix{
a1 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[dd] ar@{-}[dr] & & \
a2 ar@{-}[r] & & ar@{-}[r] & a \
a3 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[ur] & &
}
end{document}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
diagrams xy-pic tikz-cd
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it withdocumentclass{...}
, the requiredusepackage
's,begin{document}
, andend{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.
– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29
add a comment |
I am trying to figure out how to draw composition in a multicategory using same depiction used in Leinster's book "Higher Operads, Higher Categories". Here is what I am trying to draw:
I did something similar, but I could not do it completely. Here is what I got
documentclass{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix{
a1 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[dd] ar@{-}[dr] & & \
a2 ar@{-}[r] & & ar@{-}[r] & a \
a3 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[ur] & &
}
end{document}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
diagrams xy-pic tikz-cd
I am trying to figure out how to draw composition in a multicategory using same depiction used in Leinster's book "Higher Operads, Higher Categories". Here is what I am trying to draw:
I did something similar, but I could not do it completely. Here is what I got
documentclass{article}
usepackage[all]{xy}
begin{document}
xymatrix{
a1 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[dd] ar@{-}[dr] & & \
a2 ar@{-}[r] & & ar@{-}[r] & a \
a3 ar@{-}[r] & ar@{-}[ur] & &
}
end{document}
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
diagrams xy-pic tikz-cd
diagrams xy-pic tikz-cd
edited Mar 18 '16 at 13:32
LaRiFaRi
35.8k246122
35.8k246122
asked Feb 15 '16 at 1:00
DanDan
1162
1162
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it withdocumentclass{...}
, the requiredusepackage
's,begin{document}
, andend{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.
– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29
add a comment |
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it withdocumentclass{...}
, the requiredusepackage
's,begin{document}
, andend{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.
– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29
1
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it with
documentclass{...}
, the required usepackage
's, begin{document}
, and end{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it with
documentclass{...}
, the required usepackage
's, begin{document}
, and end{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here is a very similar picture that can be tweaked accordingly. In my document, all lines are adjacent to the triangles but I didn't want to include all my preamble; the positions of wires are inserted `manually' so they can easily change.
documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
usepackage[a4paper,top=3cm,bottom=3cm,inner=3cm,outer=3cm]{geometry}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,decorations.markings,arrows.meta,calc,fit,quotes,cd,math,arrows,backgrounds,shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{displaymath}
begin{tikzpicture}[triangle/.style = {fill=gray!20, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=3}]
path (0,0) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (a) {$theta_n$} (0,4) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (b) {$theta_1$} (3,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,label=135:$a_1$,label=230:$a_n$,label=178:$vdots$] (c) {$theta$} (9,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=-25pt,label=178:$vdots$] (d) {$qquadthetacirc(theta_1,ldots,theta_n)$};
draw [-] (a) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.220);
draw [-] (b) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.140);
draw [-] (d) to node [above] {$a$} (11.7,2);
draw [-] (c) to node [above] {$a$} (4,2);
draw [-] (7.2,3.5) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (7.85,3.5);
draw [-] (7.2,.5) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (7.85,.5);
draw [-] (-.85,4.3) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (-.3,4.3);
draw [-] (-.85,3.6) to node [below] {$a_{1k_1}$} (-.3,3.6);
draw [-] (-.85,0.3) to node [above] {$a_{n1}$} (-.3,0.3);
draw [-] (-.85,-0.4) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (-.3,-0.4);
node () at (5.5,2) {$mapsto$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{displaymath}
end{document}
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f293948%2fcomposition-in-a-multicategory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here is a very similar picture that can be tweaked accordingly. In my document, all lines are adjacent to the triangles but I didn't want to include all my preamble; the positions of wires are inserted `manually' so they can easily change.
documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
usepackage[a4paper,top=3cm,bottom=3cm,inner=3cm,outer=3cm]{geometry}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,decorations.markings,arrows.meta,calc,fit,quotes,cd,math,arrows,backgrounds,shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{displaymath}
begin{tikzpicture}[triangle/.style = {fill=gray!20, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=3}]
path (0,0) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (a) {$theta_n$} (0,4) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (b) {$theta_1$} (3,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,label=135:$a_1$,label=230:$a_n$,label=178:$vdots$] (c) {$theta$} (9,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=-25pt,label=178:$vdots$] (d) {$qquadthetacirc(theta_1,ldots,theta_n)$};
draw [-] (a) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.220);
draw [-] (b) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.140);
draw [-] (d) to node [above] {$a$} (11.7,2);
draw [-] (c) to node [above] {$a$} (4,2);
draw [-] (7.2,3.5) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (7.85,3.5);
draw [-] (7.2,.5) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (7.85,.5);
draw [-] (-.85,4.3) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (-.3,4.3);
draw [-] (-.85,3.6) to node [below] {$a_{1k_1}$} (-.3,3.6);
draw [-] (-.85,0.3) to node [above] {$a_{n1}$} (-.3,0.3);
draw [-] (-.85,-0.4) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (-.3,-0.4);
node () at (5.5,2) {$mapsto$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{displaymath}
end{document}
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
add a comment |
Here is a very similar picture that can be tweaked accordingly. In my document, all lines are adjacent to the triangles but I didn't want to include all my preamble; the positions of wires are inserted `manually' so they can easily change.
documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
usepackage[a4paper,top=3cm,bottom=3cm,inner=3cm,outer=3cm]{geometry}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,decorations.markings,arrows.meta,calc,fit,quotes,cd,math,arrows,backgrounds,shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{displaymath}
begin{tikzpicture}[triangle/.style = {fill=gray!20, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=3}]
path (0,0) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (a) {$theta_n$} (0,4) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (b) {$theta_1$} (3,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,label=135:$a_1$,label=230:$a_n$,label=178:$vdots$] (c) {$theta$} (9,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=-25pt,label=178:$vdots$] (d) {$qquadthetacirc(theta_1,ldots,theta_n)$};
draw [-] (a) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.220);
draw [-] (b) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.140);
draw [-] (d) to node [above] {$a$} (11.7,2);
draw [-] (c) to node [above] {$a$} (4,2);
draw [-] (7.2,3.5) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (7.85,3.5);
draw [-] (7.2,.5) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (7.85,.5);
draw [-] (-.85,4.3) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (-.3,4.3);
draw [-] (-.85,3.6) to node [below] {$a_{1k_1}$} (-.3,3.6);
draw [-] (-.85,0.3) to node [above] {$a_{n1}$} (-.3,0.3);
draw [-] (-.85,-0.4) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (-.3,-0.4);
node () at (5.5,2) {$mapsto$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{displaymath}
end{document}
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
add a comment |
Here is a very similar picture that can be tweaked accordingly. In my document, all lines are adjacent to the triangles but I didn't want to include all my preamble; the positions of wires are inserted `manually' so they can easily change.
documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
usepackage[a4paper,top=3cm,bottom=3cm,inner=3cm,outer=3cm]{geometry}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,decorations.markings,arrows.meta,calc,fit,quotes,cd,math,arrows,backgrounds,shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{displaymath}
begin{tikzpicture}[triangle/.style = {fill=gray!20, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=3}]
path (0,0) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (a) {$theta_n$} (0,4) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (b) {$theta_1$} (3,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,label=135:$a_1$,label=230:$a_n$,label=178:$vdots$] (c) {$theta$} (9,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=-25pt,label=178:$vdots$] (d) {$qquadthetacirc(theta_1,ldots,theta_n)$};
draw [-] (a) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.220);
draw [-] (b) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.140);
draw [-] (d) to node [above] {$a$} (11.7,2);
draw [-] (c) to node [above] {$a$} (4,2);
draw [-] (7.2,3.5) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (7.85,3.5);
draw [-] (7.2,.5) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (7.85,.5);
draw [-] (-.85,4.3) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (-.3,4.3);
draw [-] (-.85,3.6) to node [below] {$a_{1k_1}$} (-.3,3.6);
draw [-] (-.85,0.3) to node [above] {$a_{n1}$} (-.3,0.3);
draw [-] (-.85,-0.4) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (-.3,-0.4);
node () at (5.5,2) {$mapsto$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{displaymath}
end{document}
Here is a very similar picture that can be tweaked accordingly. In my document, all lines are adjacent to the triangles but I didn't want to include all my preamble; the positions of wires are inserted `manually' so they can easily change.
documentclass[11pt]{amsart}
usepackage[a4paper,top=3cm,bottom=3cm,inner=3cm,outer=3cm]{geometry}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{positioning,decorations.markings,arrows.meta,calc,fit,quotes,cd,math,arrows,backgrounds,shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{displaymath}
begin{tikzpicture}[triangle/.style = {fill=gray!20, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=3}]
path (0,0) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (a) {$theta_n$} (0,4) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=0pt,label=178:$vdots$] (b) {$theta_1$} (3,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,label=135:$a_1$,label=230:$a_n$,label=178:$vdots$] (c) {$theta$} (9,2) node [triangle,draw,shape border rotate=-90,inner sep=-25pt,label=178:$vdots$] (d) {$qquadthetacirc(theta_1,ldots,theta_n)$};
draw [-] (a) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.220);
draw [-] (b) .. controls +(right:2cm) and +(left:1cm).. (c.140);
draw [-] (d) to node [above] {$a$} (11.7,2);
draw [-] (c) to node [above] {$a$} (4,2);
draw [-] (7.2,3.5) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (7.85,3.5);
draw [-] (7.2,.5) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (7.85,.5);
draw [-] (-.85,4.3) to node [above] {$a_{11}$} (-.3,4.3);
draw [-] (-.85,3.6) to node [below] {$a_{1k_1}$} (-.3,3.6);
draw [-] (-.85,0.3) to node [above] {$a_{n1}$} (-.3,0.3);
draw [-] (-.85,-0.4) to node [below] {$a_{nk_n}$} (-.3,-0.4);
node () at (5.5,2) {$mapsto$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{displaymath}
end{document}
answered Jan 28 at 1:06
Christina VChristina V
313
313
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Welcome to TeX.SE!
– Kurt
Jan 28 at 3:01
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
Thanks a lot! :)
– Christina V
Jan 28 at 16:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f293948%2fcomposition-in-a-multicategory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to TeX.SX! Please make your code compilable (if possible), or at least complete it with
documentclass{...}
, the requiredusepackage
's,begin{document}
, andend{document}
. That may seem tedious to you, but think of the extra work it represents for TeX.SX users willing to give you a hand. Help them help you: remove that one hurdle between you and a solution to your problem.– cryingshadow
Feb 15 '16 at 1:15
You have tagged this with a number of apparently irrelevant tags. What does this have to do with TikZ/PGF or friends?
– cfr
Feb 15 '16 at 2:29