Holder continuity of the derivate of $|x|^alpha$ for $alpha>1$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $U=B(0,1)$ is an open ball in $mathbb R^m$ and $alpha>1$. My question is if $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ for some $gammain (0,1]$. I know that $|x|^alphain C^1(U)$ and
$$
f_i(x):=frac{partial}{partial x_i}|x|^alpha=alpha|x|^{alpha-2}x_i, mbox{ if }xneq 0.
$$
If $alphageq 2$, it is easy because we obtain $|x|^alphain C^2(U)subset C^{1,1}(U)$, with $gamma=1$ in this case.
We can suppose $1<alpha<2$. If $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ then using $x_n=frac{e_i}n$ and $y_n=-frac{e_i}n$ we obtain
$$
frac{|f_i(x_n)-f_i(y_n)|}{|x_n-y_n|^gamma}=frac{alpha}{2^{gamma-1}}n^{gamma-(alpha-1)}overset{nrightarrow+infty}longrightarrow+infty,
$$
if $gamma>alpha-1$. If this $gamma$ exist we must have $gammaleqalpha-1$. I guess that $|x|^alphain C^{1,alpha-1}(U)$.
I try proof that exist $C>0$ such that
$$
|f_i(x)-f_i(y)|leq C|x-y|^{alpha-1},
$$
but I only succeeded in the case $m=1$.
functional-analysis analysis inequality pde
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $U=B(0,1)$ is an open ball in $mathbb R^m$ and $alpha>1$. My question is if $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ for some $gammain (0,1]$. I know that $|x|^alphain C^1(U)$ and
$$
f_i(x):=frac{partial}{partial x_i}|x|^alpha=alpha|x|^{alpha-2}x_i, mbox{ if }xneq 0.
$$
If $alphageq 2$, it is easy because we obtain $|x|^alphain C^2(U)subset C^{1,1}(U)$, with $gamma=1$ in this case.
We can suppose $1<alpha<2$. If $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ then using $x_n=frac{e_i}n$ and $y_n=-frac{e_i}n$ we obtain
$$
frac{|f_i(x_n)-f_i(y_n)|}{|x_n-y_n|^gamma}=frac{alpha}{2^{gamma-1}}n^{gamma-(alpha-1)}overset{nrightarrow+infty}longrightarrow+infty,
$$
if $gamma>alpha-1$. If this $gamma$ exist we must have $gammaleqalpha-1$. I guess that $|x|^alphain C^{1,alpha-1}(U)$.
I try proof that exist $C>0$ such that
$$
|f_i(x)-f_i(y)|leq C|x-y|^{alpha-1},
$$
but I only succeeded in the case $m=1$.
functional-analysis analysis inequality pde
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Suppose $U=B(0,1)$ is an open ball in $mathbb R^m$ and $alpha>1$. My question is if $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ for some $gammain (0,1]$. I know that $|x|^alphain C^1(U)$ and
$$
f_i(x):=frac{partial}{partial x_i}|x|^alpha=alpha|x|^{alpha-2}x_i, mbox{ if }xneq 0.
$$
If $alphageq 2$, it is easy because we obtain $|x|^alphain C^2(U)subset C^{1,1}(U)$, with $gamma=1$ in this case.
We can suppose $1<alpha<2$. If $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ then using $x_n=frac{e_i}n$ and $y_n=-frac{e_i}n$ we obtain
$$
frac{|f_i(x_n)-f_i(y_n)|}{|x_n-y_n|^gamma}=frac{alpha}{2^{gamma-1}}n^{gamma-(alpha-1)}overset{nrightarrow+infty}longrightarrow+infty,
$$
if $gamma>alpha-1$. If this $gamma$ exist we must have $gammaleqalpha-1$. I guess that $|x|^alphain C^{1,alpha-1}(U)$.
I try proof that exist $C>0$ such that
$$
|f_i(x)-f_i(y)|leq C|x-y|^{alpha-1},
$$
but I only succeeded in the case $m=1$.
functional-analysis analysis inequality pde
Suppose $U=B(0,1)$ is an open ball in $mathbb R^m$ and $alpha>1$. My question is if $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ for some $gammain (0,1]$. I know that $|x|^alphain C^1(U)$ and
$$
f_i(x):=frac{partial}{partial x_i}|x|^alpha=alpha|x|^{alpha-2}x_i, mbox{ if }xneq 0.
$$
If $alphageq 2$, it is easy because we obtain $|x|^alphain C^2(U)subset C^{1,1}(U)$, with $gamma=1$ in this case.
We can suppose $1<alpha<2$. If $|x|^alphain C^{1,gamma}(U)$ then using $x_n=frac{e_i}n$ and $y_n=-frac{e_i}n$ we obtain
$$
frac{|f_i(x_n)-f_i(y_n)|}{|x_n-y_n|^gamma}=frac{alpha}{2^{gamma-1}}n^{gamma-(alpha-1)}overset{nrightarrow+infty}longrightarrow+infty,
$$
if $gamma>alpha-1$. If this $gamma$ exist we must have $gammaleqalpha-1$. I guess that $|x|^alphain C^{1,alpha-1}(U)$.
I try proof that exist $C>0$ such that
$$
|f_i(x)-f_i(y)|leq C|x-y|^{alpha-1},
$$
but I only succeeded in the case $m=1$.
functional-analysis analysis inequality pde
functional-analysis analysis inequality pde
asked Nov 19 at 21:12
Raoní Cabral Ponciano
759
759
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, let me prove this for $m=1$. The question is, whether the function
$$
g(x):= sign(x)|x|^gamma
$$
is in $C^gamma([-1,1])$ for $gammain (0,1)$. Let $x,y$ be such that $0<x<y$. Then
$$
g(y)-g(x) = int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt
$$
and by Hoelder's inequality
$$
|g(y)-g(x)| le int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt le gamma (x-y)^gamma cdot left(int_x^y |t|^{(gamma-1)cdot frac{gamma}{1-gamma}} dtright)^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
= gamma (x-y)^gamma ( y^{1-gamma}-x^{1-gamma})^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
le gamma (x-y)^gamma .
$$
In case $0<x<y$, we have $|x-y| ge |x|,|y|$, which implies
$$
frac{g(y)-g(x)}{|y-x|^gamma} =frac{|y|^gamma+ |x|^gamma}{|y-x|^gamma} le2.
$$
This shows $gin C^gamma([-1,1])$.
Let now $m>1$. Set $gamma:=alpha-1$. Then with your functions $f_i$ we have for $0<|x|le |y|$
$$
f_i(x)- f_i(y) = gamma( |x|^gamma ( frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|})+ (|x|^{gamma-1} - |y|^{gamma-1}) frac{y_i}{|y|}).
$$
The second term can be reduced to the case $m=1$. The first term is unproblematic
if $|x|le |x-y|$. Now suppose $|x|>|x-y|$, which implies $|y|le 2|x|$.
Then
$$
left|frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|} right|=left| frac{x_i(|y|-|x|)-|y|(x_i-y_i)}{|x|cdot |y|}right|lefrac{(|x|+|y|)|x-y|}{|x|cdot |y|}
le 2frac{|x-y|}{|x|} le 2|x-y|^gamma |x|^{-gamma}.
$$
This enables to prove $f_iin C^gamma(overline{B_1(0)})$ and $fin C^alpha(overline{B_1(0)})$ .
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005530%2fholder-continuity-of-the-derivate-of-x-alpha-for-alpha1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, let me prove this for $m=1$. The question is, whether the function
$$
g(x):= sign(x)|x|^gamma
$$
is in $C^gamma([-1,1])$ for $gammain (0,1)$. Let $x,y$ be such that $0<x<y$. Then
$$
g(y)-g(x) = int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt
$$
and by Hoelder's inequality
$$
|g(y)-g(x)| le int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt le gamma (x-y)^gamma cdot left(int_x^y |t|^{(gamma-1)cdot frac{gamma}{1-gamma}} dtright)^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
= gamma (x-y)^gamma ( y^{1-gamma}-x^{1-gamma})^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
le gamma (x-y)^gamma .
$$
In case $0<x<y$, we have $|x-y| ge |x|,|y|$, which implies
$$
frac{g(y)-g(x)}{|y-x|^gamma} =frac{|y|^gamma+ |x|^gamma}{|y-x|^gamma} le2.
$$
This shows $gin C^gamma([-1,1])$.
Let now $m>1$. Set $gamma:=alpha-1$. Then with your functions $f_i$ we have for $0<|x|le |y|$
$$
f_i(x)- f_i(y) = gamma( |x|^gamma ( frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|})+ (|x|^{gamma-1} - |y|^{gamma-1}) frac{y_i}{|y|}).
$$
The second term can be reduced to the case $m=1$. The first term is unproblematic
if $|x|le |x-y|$. Now suppose $|x|>|x-y|$, which implies $|y|le 2|x|$.
Then
$$
left|frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|} right|=left| frac{x_i(|y|-|x|)-|y|(x_i-y_i)}{|x|cdot |y|}right|lefrac{(|x|+|y|)|x-y|}{|x|cdot |y|}
le 2frac{|x-y|}{|x|} le 2|x-y|^gamma |x|^{-gamma}.
$$
This enables to prove $f_iin C^gamma(overline{B_1(0)})$ and $fin C^alpha(overline{B_1(0)})$ .
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, let me prove this for $m=1$. The question is, whether the function
$$
g(x):= sign(x)|x|^gamma
$$
is in $C^gamma([-1,1])$ for $gammain (0,1)$. Let $x,y$ be such that $0<x<y$. Then
$$
g(y)-g(x) = int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt
$$
and by Hoelder's inequality
$$
|g(y)-g(x)| le int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt le gamma (x-y)^gamma cdot left(int_x^y |t|^{(gamma-1)cdot frac{gamma}{1-gamma}} dtright)^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
= gamma (x-y)^gamma ( y^{1-gamma}-x^{1-gamma})^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
le gamma (x-y)^gamma .
$$
In case $0<x<y$, we have $|x-y| ge |x|,|y|$, which implies
$$
frac{g(y)-g(x)}{|y-x|^gamma} =frac{|y|^gamma+ |x|^gamma}{|y-x|^gamma} le2.
$$
This shows $gin C^gamma([-1,1])$.
Let now $m>1$. Set $gamma:=alpha-1$. Then with your functions $f_i$ we have for $0<|x|le |y|$
$$
f_i(x)- f_i(y) = gamma( |x|^gamma ( frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|})+ (|x|^{gamma-1} - |y|^{gamma-1}) frac{y_i}{|y|}).
$$
The second term can be reduced to the case $m=1$. The first term is unproblematic
if $|x|le |x-y|$. Now suppose $|x|>|x-y|$, which implies $|y|le 2|x|$.
Then
$$
left|frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|} right|=left| frac{x_i(|y|-|x|)-|y|(x_i-y_i)}{|x|cdot |y|}right|lefrac{(|x|+|y|)|x-y|}{|x|cdot |y|}
le 2frac{|x-y|}{|x|} le 2|x-y|^gamma |x|^{-gamma}.
$$
This enables to prove $f_iin C^gamma(overline{B_1(0)})$ and $fin C^alpha(overline{B_1(0)})$ .
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
First, let me prove this for $m=1$. The question is, whether the function
$$
g(x):= sign(x)|x|^gamma
$$
is in $C^gamma([-1,1])$ for $gammain (0,1)$. Let $x,y$ be such that $0<x<y$. Then
$$
g(y)-g(x) = int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt
$$
and by Hoelder's inequality
$$
|g(y)-g(x)| le int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt le gamma (x-y)^gamma cdot left(int_x^y |t|^{(gamma-1)cdot frac{gamma}{1-gamma}} dtright)^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
= gamma (x-y)^gamma ( y^{1-gamma}-x^{1-gamma})^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
le gamma (x-y)^gamma .
$$
In case $0<x<y$, we have $|x-y| ge |x|,|y|$, which implies
$$
frac{g(y)-g(x)}{|y-x|^gamma} =frac{|y|^gamma+ |x|^gamma}{|y-x|^gamma} le2.
$$
This shows $gin C^gamma([-1,1])$.
Let now $m>1$. Set $gamma:=alpha-1$. Then with your functions $f_i$ we have for $0<|x|le |y|$
$$
f_i(x)- f_i(y) = gamma( |x|^gamma ( frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|})+ (|x|^{gamma-1} - |y|^{gamma-1}) frac{y_i}{|y|}).
$$
The second term can be reduced to the case $m=1$. The first term is unproblematic
if $|x|le |x-y|$. Now suppose $|x|>|x-y|$, which implies $|y|le 2|x|$.
Then
$$
left|frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|} right|=left| frac{x_i(|y|-|x|)-|y|(x_i-y_i)}{|x|cdot |y|}right|lefrac{(|x|+|y|)|x-y|}{|x|cdot |y|}
le 2frac{|x-y|}{|x|} le 2|x-y|^gamma |x|^{-gamma}.
$$
This enables to prove $f_iin C^gamma(overline{B_1(0)})$ and $fin C^alpha(overline{B_1(0)})$ .
First, let me prove this for $m=1$. The question is, whether the function
$$
g(x):= sign(x)|x|^gamma
$$
is in $C^gamma([-1,1])$ for $gammain (0,1)$. Let $x,y$ be such that $0<x<y$. Then
$$
g(y)-g(x) = int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt
$$
and by Hoelder's inequality
$$
|g(y)-g(x)| le int_x^y gamma t^{gamma-1}dt le gamma (x-y)^gamma cdot left(int_x^y |t|^{(gamma-1)cdot frac{gamma}{1-gamma}} dtright)^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
= gamma (x-y)^gamma ( y^{1-gamma}-x^{1-gamma})^{frac{1-gamma}gamma}
le gamma (x-y)^gamma .
$$
In case $0<x<y$, we have $|x-y| ge |x|,|y|$, which implies
$$
frac{g(y)-g(x)}{|y-x|^gamma} =frac{|y|^gamma+ |x|^gamma}{|y-x|^gamma} le2.
$$
This shows $gin C^gamma([-1,1])$.
Let now $m>1$. Set $gamma:=alpha-1$. Then with your functions $f_i$ we have for $0<|x|le |y|$
$$
f_i(x)- f_i(y) = gamma( |x|^gamma ( frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|})+ (|x|^{gamma-1} - |y|^{gamma-1}) frac{y_i}{|y|}).
$$
The second term can be reduced to the case $m=1$. The first term is unproblematic
if $|x|le |x-y|$. Now suppose $|x|>|x-y|$, which implies $|y|le 2|x|$.
Then
$$
left|frac{x_i}{|x|} - frac{y_i}{|y|} right|=left| frac{x_i(|y|-|x|)-|y|(x_i-y_i)}{|x|cdot |y|}right|lefrac{(|x|+|y|)|x-y|}{|x|cdot |y|}
le 2frac{|x-y|}{|x|} le 2|x-y|^gamma |x|^{-gamma}.
$$
This enables to prove $f_iin C^gamma(overline{B_1(0)})$ and $fin C^alpha(overline{B_1(0)})$ .
answered Nov 20 at 8:03
daw
24k1544
24k1544
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005530%2fholder-continuity-of-the-derivate-of-x-alpha-for-alpha1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown