Custom Distro Trademark usage
According to this document, creation of custom Ubuntu distros is allowed. The document gives a general outline on what to change and modify. There is however a section that confuses me/needs help finding out how to correctly apply.
- File /etc/lsb-release (from package base-files) contains name of
distro, which is used by some tools (for example network configuration
tools) to identify how to handle files. Also the content of this file
(AFAIK) is displayed in console login. Should the contents of this file
(i.e. base-files package) be replaced in derivative distro?
This is a tricky one, since the file is used both to tell the user the
name of the distribution and by programs to identify it. The former
should change, but not the latter. Perhaps changing
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION but not DISTRIB_ID is the right thing to do.
This section mentions the contents of /etc/lsb-release to match the name of the distro. It says that the contents of DISTRIB_ID should be changed to match the name of the distro, but also claims that it messes up certain tools. It then mentions changing DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION to the name of your distro. What should I do with this?
custom-distributions trademark
add a comment |
According to this document, creation of custom Ubuntu distros is allowed. The document gives a general outline on what to change and modify. There is however a section that confuses me/needs help finding out how to correctly apply.
- File /etc/lsb-release (from package base-files) contains name of
distro, which is used by some tools (for example network configuration
tools) to identify how to handle files. Also the content of this file
(AFAIK) is displayed in console login. Should the contents of this file
(i.e. base-files package) be replaced in derivative distro?
This is a tricky one, since the file is used both to tell the user the
name of the distribution and by programs to identify it. The former
should change, but not the latter. Perhaps changing
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION but not DISTRIB_ID is the right thing to do.
This section mentions the contents of /etc/lsb-release to match the name of the distro. It says that the contents of DISTRIB_ID should be changed to match the name of the distro, but also claims that it messes up certain tools. It then mentions changing DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION to the name of your distro. What should I do with this?
custom-distributions trademark
add a comment |
According to this document, creation of custom Ubuntu distros is allowed. The document gives a general outline on what to change and modify. There is however a section that confuses me/needs help finding out how to correctly apply.
- File /etc/lsb-release (from package base-files) contains name of
distro, which is used by some tools (for example network configuration
tools) to identify how to handle files. Also the content of this file
(AFAIK) is displayed in console login. Should the contents of this file
(i.e. base-files package) be replaced in derivative distro?
This is a tricky one, since the file is used both to tell the user the
name of the distribution and by programs to identify it. The former
should change, but not the latter. Perhaps changing
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION but not DISTRIB_ID is the right thing to do.
This section mentions the contents of /etc/lsb-release to match the name of the distro. It says that the contents of DISTRIB_ID should be changed to match the name of the distro, but also claims that it messes up certain tools. It then mentions changing DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION to the name of your distro. What should I do with this?
custom-distributions trademark
According to this document, creation of custom Ubuntu distros is allowed. The document gives a general outline on what to change and modify. There is however a section that confuses me/needs help finding out how to correctly apply.
- File /etc/lsb-release (from package base-files) contains name of
distro, which is used by some tools (for example network configuration
tools) to identify how to handle files. Also the content of this file
(AFAIK) is displayed in console login. Should the contents of this file
(i.e. base-files package) be replaced in derivative distro?
This is a tricky one, since the file is used both to tell the user the
name of the distribution and by programs to identify it. The former
should change, but not the latter. Perhaps changing
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION but not DISTRIB_ID is the right thing to do.
This section mentions the contents of /etc/lsb-release to match the name of the distro. It says that the contents of DISTRIB_ID should be changed to match the name of the distro, but also claims that it messes up certain tools. It then mentions changing DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION to the name of your distro. What should I do with this?
custom-distributions trademark
custom-distributions trademark
asked Oct 6 '15 at 12:51
noirscapenoirscape
18220
18220
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Depending on your intention, you may or may not require to modify the contents of /etc/lsb-release
file for your Ubuntu-based custom distro (or likely defined as "remix").
Rationale for lsb-release
From what I understand, the content of /etc/lsb-release
mainly used for determining whether you can update your packages from existing Ubuntu repositories or not.
Below are the supporting examples, which include combined output from different distro based on Ubuntu 12.04 release.
kubuntu@kubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS"
xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
^ Despite Ubuntu official flavours' name are Kubuntu and Xubuntu, these were never used in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. This is because the Ubuntu official flavours share and retrieve the same packages from the same repositories like Ubuntu does.
mint@mint ~ $ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maya
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 13 Maya"
trisquel@trisquel:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Trisquel
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0
DISTRIB_CODENAME=toutatis
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Trisquel 6.0"
^ These Ubuntu derivatives' name are Linux Mint and Trisquel and their names were included in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. While they get the sources from Ubuntu repositories, these derivatives host their own packages. Therefore, they can define their own releases.
The combined output above (the one from Kubuntu and Xubuntu) already gave us a hint. Only edit DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=""
and replace the string with "Something 1.0 Else"
. This means you can still update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories.
Trademark issue
Until few years ago, there was "Ubuntu Trademark Policy" but now it is redirected to this page called "Intellectual property rights policy". Few relevant points have been quoted below:
[...]
You can modify Ubuntu for personal or internal commercial use.
[...]
Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. [...]
Based on these, if you intend to build custom or modified version of Ubuntu and redistribute it, you must do rebranding. This means not just /etc/lsb-release
anymore.
But, if you are not redistributing the custom build and wish to update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories, then modifying /etc/lsb-release
as explained should suffice. Otherwise depends on yourself; To which extent you would like to customize the build.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f682140%2fcustom-distro-trademark-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Depending on your intention, you may or may not require to modify the contents of /etc/lsb-release
file for your Ubuntu-based custom distro (or likely defined as "remix").
Rationale for lsb-release
From what I understand, the content of /etc/lsb-release
mainly used for determining whether you can update your packages from existing Ubuntu repositories or not.
Below are the supporting examples, which include combined output from different distro based on Ubuntu 12.04 release.
kubuntu@kubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS"
xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
^ Despite Ubuntu official flavours' name are Kubuntu and Xubuntu, these were never used in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. This is because the Ubuntu official flavours share and retrieve the same packages from the same repositories like Ubuntu does.
mint@mint ~ $ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maya
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 13 Maya"
trisquel@trisquel:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Trisquel
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0
DISTRIB_CODENAME=toutatis
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Trisquel 6.0"
^ These Ubuntu derivatives' name are Linux Mint and Trisquel and their names were included in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. While they get the sources from Ubuntu repositories, these derivatives host their own packages. Therefore, they can define their own releases.
The combined output above (the one from Kubuntu and Xubuntu) already gave us a hint. Only edit DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=""
and replace the string with "Something 1.0 Else"
. This means you can still update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories.
Trademark issue
Until few years ago, there was "Ubuntu Trademark Policy" but now it is redirected to this page called "Intellectual property rights policy". Few relevant points have been quoted below:
[...]
You can modify Ubuntu for personal or internal commercial use.
[...]
Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. [...]
Based on these, if you intend to build custom or modified version of Ubuntu and redistribute it, you must do rebranding. This means not just /etc/lsb-release
anymore.
But, if you are not redistributing the custom build and wish to update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories, then modifying /etc/lsb-release
as explained should suffice. Otherwise depends on yourself; To which extent you would like to customize the build.
add a comment |
Depending on your intention, you may or may not require to modify the contents of /etc/lsb-release
file for your Ubuntu-based custom distro (or likely defined as "remix").
Rationale for lsb-release
From what I understand, the content of /etc/lsb-release
mainly used for determining whether you can update your packages from existing Ubuntu repositories or not.
Below are the supporting examples, which include combined output from different distro based on Ubuntu 12.04 release.
kubuntu@kubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS"
xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
^ Despite Ubuntu official flavours' name are Kubuntu and Xubuntu, these were never used in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. This is because the Ubuntu official flavours share and retrieve the same packages from the same repositories like Ubuntu does.
mint@mint ~ $ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maya
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 13 Maya"
trisquel@trisquel:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Trisquel
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0
DISTRIB_CODENAME=toutatis
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Trisquel 6.0"
^ These Ubuntu derivatives' name are Linux Mint and Trisquel and their names were included in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. While they get the sources from Ubuntu repositories, these derivatives host their own packages. Therefore, they can define their own releases.
The combined output above (the one from Kubuntu and Xubuntu) already gave us a hint. Only edit DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=""
and replace the string with "Something 1.0 Else"
. This means you can still update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories.
Trademark issue
Until few years ago, there was "Ubuntu Trademark Policy" but now it is redirected to this page called "Intellectual property rights policy". Few relevant points have been quoted below:
[...]
You can modify Ubuntu for personal or internal commercial use.
[...]
Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. [...]
Based on these, if you intend to build custom or modified version of Ubuntu and redistribute it, you must do rebranding. This means not just /etc/lsb-release
anymore.
But, if you are not redistributing the custom build and wish to update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories, then modifying /etc/lsb-release
as explained should suffice. Otherwise depends on yourself; To which extent you would like to customize the build.
add a comment |
Depending on your intention, you may or may not require to modify the contents of /etc/lsb-release
file for your Ubuntu-based custom distro (or likely defined as "remix").
Rationale for lsb-release
From what I understand, the content of /etc/lsb-release
mainly used for determining whether you can update your packages from existing Ubuntu repositories or not.
Below are the supporting examples, which include combined output from different distro based on Ubuntu 12.04 release.
kubuntu@kubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS"
xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
^ Despite Ubuntu official flavours' name are Kubuntu and Xubuntu, these were never used in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. This is because the Ubuntu official flavours share and retrieve the same packages from the same repositories like Ubuntu does.
mint@mint ~ $ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maya
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 13 Maya"
trisquel@trisquel:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Trisquel
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0
DISTRIB_CODENAME=toutatis
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Trisquel 6.0"
^ These Ubuntu derivatives' name are Linux Mint and Trisquel and their names were included in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. While they get the sources from Ubuntu repositories, these derivatives host their own packages. Therefore, they can define their own releases.
The combined output above (the one from Kubuntu and Xubuntu) already gave us a hint. Only edit DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=""
and replace the string with "Something 1.0 Else"
. This means you can still update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories.
Trademark issue
Until few years ago, there was "Ubuntu Trademark Policy" but now it is redirected to this page called "Intellectual property rights policy". Few relevant points have been quoted below:
[...]
You can modify Ubuntu for personal or internal commercial use.
[...]
Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. [...]
Based on these, if you intend to build custom or modified version of Ubuntu and redistribute it, you must do rebranding. This means not just /etc/lsb-release
anymore.
But, if you are not redistributing the custom build and wish to update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories, then modifying /etc/lsb-release
as explained should suffice. Otherwise depends on yourself; To which extent you would like to customize the build.
Depending on your intention, you may or may not require to modify the contents of /etc/lsb-release
file for your Ubuntu-based custom distro (or likely defined as "remix").
Rationale for lsb-release
From what I understand, the content of /etc/lsb-release
mainly used for determining whether you can update your packages from existing Ubuntu repositories or not.
Below are the supporting examples, which include combined output from different distro based on Ubuntu 12.04 release.
kubuntu@kubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS"
xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
^ Despite Ubuntu official flavours' name are Kubuntu and Xubuntu, these were never used in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. This is because the Ubuntu official flavours share and retrieve the same packages from the same repositories like Ubuntu does.
mint@mint ~ $ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=13
DISTRIB_CODENAME=maya
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 13 Maya"
trisquel@trisquel:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Trisquel
DISTRIB_RELEASE=6.0
DISTRIB_CODENAME=toutatis
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Trisquel 6.0"
^ These Ubuntu derivatives' name are Linux Mint and Trisquel and their names were included in the content of /etc/lsb-release
file. While they get the sources from Ubuntu repositories, these derivatives host their own packages. Therefore, they can define their own releases.
The combined output above (the one from Kubuntu and Xubuntu) already gave us a hint. Only edit DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=""
and replace the string with "Something 1.0 Else"
. This means you can still update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories.
Trademark issue
Until few years ago, there was "Ubuntu Trademark Policy" but now it is redirected to this page called "Intellectual property rights policy". Few relevant points have been quoted below:
[...]
You can modify Ubuntu for personal or internal commercial use.
[...]
Any redistribution of modified versions of Ubuntu must be approved, certified or provided by Canonical if you are going to associate it with the Trademarks. Otherwise you must remove and replace the Trademarks and will need to recompile the source code to create your own binaries. This does not affect your rights under any open source licence applicable to any of the components of Ubuntu. [...]
Based on these, if you intend to build custom or modified version of Ubuntu and redistribute it, you must do rebranding. This means not just /etc/lsb-release
anymore.
But, if you are not redistributing the custom build and wish to update and retrieve packages from existing Ubuntu repositories, then modifying /etc/lsb-release
as explained should suffice. Otherwise depends on yourself; To which extent you would like to customize the build.
edited Jan 7 at 6:58
answered Oct 6 '15 at 17:07
clearkimuraclearkimura
3,98511956
3,98511956
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f682140%2fcustom-distro-trademark-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown