Which surfaces does a compact orientable surface with boundary cover?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Suppose I have a bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles. Is there a way to determine what surfaces it covers?



First, I know that there is a covering map from the closed orientable surface of genus 5 to the closed non-orientable surface of genus 6. This covering map "corresponds" to the quotient maps that identifies anti-podal points. With this in mind, I think the the bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles covers a bounded non-orientable surface of genus 6 with 2 boundary circles.



Am I understanding this correctly? Can I take this further? Thanks for any responses!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
    – Nick L
    Nov 18 at 15:57

















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Suppose I have a bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles. Is there a way to determine what surfaces it covers?



First, I know that there is a covering map from the closed orientable surface of genus 5 to the closed non-orientable surface of genus 6. This covering map "corresponds" to the quotient maps that identifies anti-podal points. With this in mind, I think the the bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles covers a bounded non-orientable surface of genus 6 with 2 boundary circles.



Am I understanding this correctly? Can I take this further? Thanks for any responses!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
    – Nick L
    Nov 18 at 15:57















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





Suppose I have a bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles. Is there a way to determine what surfaces it covers?



First, I know that there is a covering map from the closed orientable surface of genus 5 to the closed non-orientable surface of genus 6. This covering map "corresponds" to the quotient maps that identifies anti-podal points. With this in mind, I think the the bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles covers a bounded non-orientable surface of genus 6 with 2 boundary circles.



Am I understanding this correctly? Can I take this further? Thanks for any responses!










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose I have a bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles. Is there a way to determine what surfaces it covers?



First, I know that there is a covering map from the closed orientable surface of genus 5 to the closed non-orientable surface of genus 6. This covering map "corresponds" to the quotient maps that identifies anti-podal points. With this in mind, I think the the bounded, orientable genus 5 surface with 4 boundary circles covers a bounded non-orientable surface of genus 6 with 2 boundary circles.



Am I understanding this correctly? Can I take this further? Thanks for any responses!







algebraic-topology surfaces covering-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 18 at 16:10









Michael Albanese

62.8k1598302




62.8k1598302










asked Nov 18 at 0:13









MathUser_NotPrime

1,189212




1,189212








  • 1




    One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
    – Nick L
    Nov 18 at 15:57
















  • 1




    One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
    – Nick L
    Nov 18 at 15:57










1




1




One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
– Nick L
Nov 18 at 15:57






One obvious comment: if $S$ covers $S'$ Then $chi(S) = dchi(S')$ where $d>0$ is the degree of the cover. Also if $S$ has non- empty boundary $S'$ must have non-empty boundary. This gives a small number of possibilities to chrck, since for us $chi(S)=-12$.
– Nick L
Nov 18 at 15:57












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










In my answer below, I was implicitly assuming that the covering on the boundary was trivial. As Mike Miller points out below, this is not necessarily the case. See his comments for more details.





Denote the closed orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $Sigma_{g, b}$, and the closed non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $S_{g,b}$. Recall that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = 2 - 2g - b$ and $chi(S_{g,b}) = 2 - g - b$.



If $p : M to N$ is a covering map between manifolds with boundary, then it restricts to a covering map $p|_{partial M} : partial M to partial N$ of the same degree. So if $p : Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$ is a degree $k$ covering map, then $b = kb'$. Moreover,



begin{align*}
chi(Sigma_{g,b}) &= kchi(Sigma_{g',b'})\
2 - 2g - b &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g - kb' &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g &= k(2 - 2g')\
chi(Sigma_g) &= kchi(Sigma_{g'}).
end{align*}



The converse is also true. That is, if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$ and $b = kb'$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$. To see this, note that if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $p : Sigma_g to Sigma_{g'}$; see this answer. If $D subset Sigma_{g'}$ is the interior of a closed disc in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(D)$ is a disjoint union of the interiors of $k$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_g$. So if $D_1, dots, D_{b'}$ are the interiors of $b'$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(Sigma_{g'}setminus(D_1cupdotscup D_{b'})$ is $Sigma_g$ with $kb' = b$ interiors of disjoint closed discs removed, i.e. $Sigma_{g,b}$. Therefore the restriction of $p$ to $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a degree $k$ covering $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$.



Likewise, $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a $k$-sheeted covering of $S_{g',b'}$ if and only if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(S_g)$, $b = kb'$ and $k$ is even. Note that $k$ must be even as any orientable covering of a non-orientable manifold must factor through the orientation double cover.



Therefore, we have the following complete list of coverings:





  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{5,4}$ of degree one,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{3,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{6,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{2,1}$ of degree four, and


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{4,1}$ of degree four.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:04










  • In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:07












  • You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
    – Michael Albanese
    Nov 19 at 0:07






  • 1




    That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 19 at 0:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002996%2fwhich-surfaces-does-a-compact-orientable-surface-with-boundary-cover%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










In my answer below, I was implicitly assuming that the covering on the boundary was trivial. As Mike Miller points out below, this is not necessarily the case. See his comments for more details.





Denote the closed orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $Sigma_{g, b}$, and the closed non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $S_{g,b}$. Recall that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = 2 - 2g - b$ and $chi(S_{g,b}) = 2 - g - b$.



If $p : M to N$ is a covering map between manifolds with boundary, then it restricts to a covering map $p|_{partial M} : partial M to partial N$ of the same degree. So if $p : Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$ is a degree $k$ covering map, then $b = kb'$. Moreover,



begin{align*}
chi(Sigma_{g,b}) &= kchi(Sigma_{g',b'})\
2 - 2g - b &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g - kb' &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g &= k(2 - 2g')\
chi(Sigma_g) &= kchi(Sigma_{g'}).
end{align*}



The converse is also true. That is, if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$ and $b = kb'$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$. To see this, note that if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $p : Sigma_g to Sigma_{g'}$; see this answer. If $D subset Sigma_{g'}$ is the interior of a closed disc in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(D)$ is a disjoint union of the interiors of $k$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_g$. So if $D_1, dots, D_{b'}$ are the interiors of $b'$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(Sigma_{g'}setminus(D_1cupdotscup D_{b'})$ is $Sigma_g$ with $kb' = b$ interiors of disjoint closed discs removed, i.e. $Sigma_{g,b}$. Therefore the restriction of $p$ to $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a degree $k$ covering $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$.



Likewise, $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a $k$-sheeted covering of $S_{g',b'}$ if and only if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(S_g)$, $b = kb'$ and $k$ is even. Note that $k$ must be even as any orientable covering of a non-orientable manifold must factor through the orientation double cover.



Therefore, we have the following complete list of coverings:





  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{5,4}$ of degree one,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{3,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{6,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{2,1}$ of degree four, and


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{4,1}$ of degree four.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:04










  • In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:07












  • You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
    – Michael Albanese
    Nov 19 at 0:07






  • 1




    That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 19 at 0:16















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










In my answer below, I was implicitly assuming that the covering on the boundary was trivial. As Mike Miller points out below, this is not necessarily the case. See his comments for more details.





Denote the closed orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $Sigma_{g, b}$, and the closed non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $S_{g,b}$. Recall that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = 2 - 2g - b$ and $chi(S_{g,b}) = 2 - g - b$.



If $p : M to N$ is a covering map between manifolds with boundary, then it restricts to a covering map $p|_{partial M} : partial M to partial N$ of the same degree. So if $p : Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$ is a degree $k$ covering map, then $b = kb'$. Moreover,



begin{align*}
chi(Sigma_{g,b}) &= kchi(Sigma_{g',b'})\
2 - 2g - b &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g - kb' &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g &= k(2 - 2g')\
chi(Sigma_g) &= kchi(Sigma_{g'}).
end{align*}



The converse is also true. That is, if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$ and $b = kb'$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$. To see this, note that if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $p : Sigma_g to Sigma_{g'}$; see this answer. If $D subset Sigma_{g'}$ is the interior of a closed disc in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(D)$ is a disjoint union of the interiors of $k$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_g$. So if $D_1, dots, D_{b'}$ are the interiors of $b'$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(Sigma_{g'}setminus(D_1cupdotscup D_{b'})$ is $Sigma_g$ with $kb' = b$ interiors of disjoint closed discs removed, i.e. $Sigma_{g,b}$. Therefore the restriction of $p$ to $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a degree $k$ covering $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$.



Likewise, $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a $k$-sheeted covering of $S_{g',b'}$ if and only if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(S_g)$, $b = kb'$ and $k$ is even. Note that $k$ must be even as any orientable covering of a non-orientable manifold must factor through the orientation double cover.



Therefore, we have the following complete list of coverings:





  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{5,4}$ of degree one,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{3,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{6,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{2,1}$ of degree four, and


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{4,1}$ of degree four.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:04










  • In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:07












  • You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
    – Michael Albanese
    Nov 19 at 0:07






  • 1




    That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 19 at 0:16













up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






In my answer below, I was implicitly assuming that the covering on the boundary was trivial. As Mike Miller points out below, this is not necessarily the case. See his comments for more details.





Denote the closed orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $Sigma_{g, b}$, and the closed non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $S_{g,b}$. Recall that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = 2 - 2g - b$ and $chi(S_{g,b}) = 2 - g - b$.



If $p : M to N$ is a covering map between manifolds with boundary, then it restricts to a covering map $p|_{partial M} : partial M to partial N$ of the same degree. So if $p : Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$ is a degree $k$ covering map, then $b = kb'$. Moreover,



begin{align*}
chi(Sigma_{g,b}) &= kchi(Sigma_{g',b'})\
2 - 2g - b &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g - kb' &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g &= k(2 - 2g')\
chi(Sigma_g) &= kchi(Sigma_{g'}).
end{align*}



The converse is also true. That is, if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$ and $b = kb'$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$. To see this, note that if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $p : Sigma_g to Sigma_{g'}$; see this answer. If $D subset Sigma_{g'}$ is the interior of a closed disc in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(D)$ is a disjoint union of the interiors of $k$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_g$. So if $D_1, dots, D_{b'}$ are the interiors of $b'$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(Sigma_{g'}setminus(D_1cupdotscup D_{b'})$ is $Sigma_g$ with $kb' = b$ interiors of disjoint closed discs removed, i.e. $Sigma_{g,b}$. Therefore the restriction of $p$ to $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a degree $k$ covering $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$.



Likewise, $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a $k$-sheeted covering of $S_{g',b'}$ if and only if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(S_g)$, $b = kb'$ and $k$ is even. Note that $k$ must be even as any orientable covering of a non-orientable manifold must factor through the orientation double cover.



Therefore, we have the following complete list of coverings:





  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{5,4}$ of degree one,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{3,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{6,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{2,1}$ of degree four, and


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{4,1}$ of degree four.






share|cite|improve this answer














In my answer below, I was implicitly assuming that the covering on the boundary was trivial. As Mike Miller points out below, this is not necessarily the case. See his comments for more details.





Denote the closed orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $Sigma_{g, b}$, and the closed non-orientable surface of genus $g$ with $b$ boundary components by $S_{g,b}$. Recall that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = 2 - 2g - b$ and $chi(S_{g,b}) = 2 - g - b$.



If $p : M to N$ is a covering map between manifolds with boundary, then it restricts to a covering map $p|_{partial M} : partial M to partial N$ of the same degree. So if $p : Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$ is a degree $k$ covering map, then $b = kb'$. Moreover,



begin{align*}
chi(Sigma_{g,b}) &= kchi(Sigma_{g',b'})\
2 - 2g - b &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g - kb' &= k(2 - 2g' - b')\
2 - 2g &= k(2 - 2g')\
chi(Sigma_g) &= kchi(Sigma_{g'}).
end{align*}



The converse is also true. That is, if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$ and $b = kb'$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$. To see this, note that if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(Sigma_{g'})$, then there is a degree $k$ covering map $p : Sigma_g to Sigma_{g'}$; see this answer. If $D subset Sigma_{g'}$ is the interior of a closed disc in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(D)$ is a disjoint union of the interiors of $k$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_g$. So if $D_1, dots, D_{b'}$ are the interiors of $b'$ disjoint closed discs in $Sigma_{g'}$, then $p^{-1}(Sigma_{g'}setminus(D_1cupdotscup D_{b'})$ is $Sigma_g$ with $kb' = b$ interiors of disjoint closed discs removed, i.e. $Sigma_{g,b}$. Therefore the restriction of $p$ to $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a degree $k$ covering $Sigma_{g,b} to Sigma_{g',b'}$.



Likewise, $Sigma_{g,b}$ is a $k$-sheeted covering of $S_{g',b'}$ if and only if $chi(Sigma_g) = kchi(S_g)$, $b = kb'$ and $k$ is even. Note that $k$ must be even as any orientable covering of a non-orientable manifold must factor through the orientation double cover.



Therefore, we have the following complete list of coverings:





  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{5,4}$ of degree one,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{3,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{6,2}$ of degree two,


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to Sigma_{2,1}$ of degree four, and


  • $Sigma_{5,4} to S_{4,1}$ of degree four.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 21 at 1:31

























answered Nov 18 at 16:09









Michael Albanese

62.8k1598302




62.8k1598302












  • I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:04










  • In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:07












  • You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
    – Michael Albanese
    Nov 19 at 0:07






  • 1




    That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 19 at 0:16


















  • I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:04










  • In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 18 at 20:07












  • You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
    – Michael Albanese
    Nov 19 at 0:07






  • 1




    That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
    – Mike Miller
    Nov 19 at 0:16
















I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 18 at 20:04




I believe you've made an assumption here that the covering map is trivial on the boundary, which is not necessary; the condition on boundary components should be $b/k leq b' leq b$. I still believe your claim that (in addition to this constraint) the only condition is that $chi(Sigma_{g,b}) = k chi(Sigma_{g', b'})$, but I do not know a nice reference. I think there is some literature further trying to specify the data of $(g',b')$ and the $k$-partition of $b$ corresponding to the degrees of covers on the boundary, and IIRC all are realizable except possibly some with $g = 0$.
– Mike Miller
Nov 18 at 20:04












In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
– Mike Miller
Nov 18 at 20:07






In particular, I think the following should also be on the list of possible covers: $Sigma_{2,4}, Sigma_{1,4}, Sigma_{1,3}, Sigma_{1,2}, Sigma_{0,4}, Sigma_{1,1}, Sigma_{0,3},$ and I think all should be realized. I think there is an evenness condition as you say on the number of boundary components and one should have similar results for covering $S_{g',b'}$. If you fill the boundary components in with discs, these covering maps correspond go branched covers with specified branching data, and yours correspond to those with trivial branch data (i.e., are actually covering maps).
– Mike Miller
Nov 18 at 20:07














You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
– Michael Albanese
Nov 19 at 0:07




You're right. Can't believe I missed that.
– Michael Albanese
Nov 19 at 0:07




1




1




That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
– Mike Miller
Nov 19 at 0:16




That subtlety has bitten me more than once.
– Mike Miller
Nov 19 at 0:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002996%2fwhich-surfaces-does-a-compact-orientable-surface-with-boundary-cover%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

mysqli_query(): Empty query in /home/lucindabrummitt/public_html/blog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1924

How to change which sound is reproduced for terminal bell?

Can I use Tabulator js library in my java Spring + Thymeleaf project?