Use orthogonality to proof Parseval's identity for the general Fourier series written as the power spectrum
$begingroup$
I need to show that $$int_{-pi}^{pi}left|frac{a_0}{2}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right|^2dx=2pileft(frac{a_0^2}{4}+frac12sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_n^2right)tag{1}$$
Just for reference the trigonometric Fourier series is
$$f(x)= frac{a_0}{2} + sum_{n=1}^{infty}left(a_ncos(nx)+b_nsin(nx)right)$$
and the connection between the trigonometric Fourier series and the power spectrum is given by
$$a_n=alpha_ncostheta_n$$
$$b_n=alpha_nsintheta_n$$
$$alpha_n^2=a_n^2+b_n^2$$
$$tantheta_n=frac{b_n}{a_n}$$
So I start by expanding the LHS of $(mathrm{1})$
$$int_{-pi}^{pi}left{frac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)+left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2right}dx$$
$$=
int_{-pi}^{pi}frac{a_0^2}{4}dx+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx+int_{-pi}^{pi}left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2dx$$
$$= 2pifrac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx$$
$$+int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)sum_{m=1}^{infty}alpha_mcos(mx-theta_m)dxtag{2}$$
I don't know how to proceed any further with this but do I know that for integer $nne m$
$$langlecos(nx)|cos(mx)rangle=0$$
but I am struggling to apply the same logic to $(mathrm{2})$ as the cosines have different phase offsets, I am also confused about how to deal with the 2 sums in the second integral.
The answer just states that:
Does anyone have any advice on how I can complete this proof?
summation fourier-analysis fourier-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to show that $$int_{-pi}^{pi}left|frac{a_0}{2}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right|^2dx=2pileft(frac{a_0^2}{4}+frac12sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_n^2right)tag{1}$$
Just for reference the trigonometric Fourier series is
$$f(x)= frac{a_0}{2} + sum_{n=1}^{infty}left(a_ncos(nx)+b_nsin(nx)right)$$
and the connection between the trigonometric Fourier series and the power spectrum is given by
$$a_n=alpha_ncostheta_n$$
$$b_n=alpha_nsintheta_n$$
$$alpha_n^2=a_n^2+b_n^2$$
$$tantheta_n=frac{b_n}{a_n}$$
So I start by expanding the LHS of $(mathrm{1})$
$$int_{-pi}^{pi}left{frac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)+left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2right}dx$$
$$=
int_{-pi}^{pi}frac{a_0^2}{4}dx+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx+int_{-pi}^{pi}left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2dx$$
$$= 2pifrac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx$$
$$+int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)sum_{m=1}^{infty}alpha_mcos(mx-theta_m)dxtag{2}$$
I don't know how to proceed any further with this but do I know that for integer $nne m$
$$langlecos(nx)|cos(mx)rangle=0$$
but I am struggling to apply the same logic to $(mathrm{2})$ as the cosines have different phase offsets, I am also confused about how to deal with the 2 sums in the second integral.
The answer just states that:
Does anyone have any advice on how I can complete this proof?
summation fourier-analysis fourier-series
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need to show that $$int_{-pi}^{pi}left|frac{a_0}{2}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right|^2dx=2pileft(frac{a_0^2}{4}+frac12sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_n^2right)tag{1}$$
Just for reference the trigonometric Fourier series is
$$f(x)= frac{a_0}{2} + sum_{n=1}^{infty}left(a_ncos(nx)+b_nsin(nx)right)$$
and the connection between the trigonometric Fourier series and the power spectrum is given by
$$a_n=alpha_ncostheta_n$$
$$b_n=alpha_nsintheta_n$$
$$alpha_n^2=a_n^2+b_n^2$$
$$tantheta_n=frac{b_n}{a_n}$$
So I start by expanding the LHS of $(mathrm{1})$
$$int_{-pi}^{pi}left{frac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)+left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2right}dx$$
$$=
int_{-pi}^{pi}frac{a_0^2}{4}dx+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx+int_{-pi}^{pi}left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2dx$$
$$= 2pifrac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx$$
$$+int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)sum_{m=1}^{infty}alpha_mcos(mx-theta_m)dxtag{2}$$
I don't know how to proceed any further with this but do I know that for integer $nne m$
$$langlecos(nx)|cos(mx)rangle=0$$
but I am struggling to apply the same logic to $(mathrm{2})$ as the cosines have different phase offsets, I am also confused about how to deal with the 2 sums in the second integral.
The answer just states that:
Does anyone have any advice on how I can complete this proof?
summation fourier-analysis fourier-series
$endgroup$
I need to show that $$int_{-pi}^{pi}left|frac{a_0}{2}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right|^2dx=2pileft(frac{a_0^2}{4}+frac12sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_n^2right)tag{1}$$
Just for reference the trigonometric Fourier series is
$$f(x)= frac{a_0}{2} + sum_{n=1}^{infty}left(a_ncos(nx)+b_nsin(nx)right)$$
and the connection between the trigonometric Fourier series and the power spectrum is given by
$$a_n=alpha_ncostheta_n$$
$$b_n=alpha_nsintheta_n$$
$$alpha_n^2=a_n^2+b_n^2$$
$$tantheta_n=frac{b_n}{a_n}$$
So I start by expanding the LHS of $(mathrm{1})$
$$int_{-pi}^{pi}left{frac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)+left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2right}dx$$
$$=
int_{-pi}^{pi}frac{a_0^2}{4}dx+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx+int_{-pi}^{pi}left[sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)right]^2dx$$
$$= 2pifrac{a_0^2}{4}+a_0int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)dx$$
$$+int_{-pi}^{pi}sum_{n=1}^{infty}alpha_ncos(nx-theta_n)sum_{m=1}^{infty}alpha_mcos(mx-theta_m)dxtag{2}$$
I don't know how to proceed any further with this but do I know that for integer $nne m$
$$langlecos(nx)|cos(mx)rangle=0$$
but I am struggling to apply the same logic to $(mathrm{2})$ as the cosines have different phase offsets, I am also confused about how to deal with the 2 sums in the second integral.
The answer just states that:
Does anyone have any advice on how I can complete this proof?
summation fourier-analysis fourier-series
summation fourier-analysis fourier-series
edited Nov 26 '18 at 19:51
BLAZE
asked Nov 26 '18 at 17:22
BLAZEBLAZE
6,076112755
6,076112755
1
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37
1
1
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$cos(nx-theta_n)=cos(nx)cos(theta_n)+sin(nx)sin(theta_n)$$
Therefore
$$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx-theta_n)cos(mx-theta_m)dx={cos(theta_n)cos(theta_m)int_{-pi}^pi left(cos(nx)cos(mx)right)dx quadtext{etc.}}$$
For $nne m$, $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)cos(mx)dx=0$$ and in general $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)sin(mx)dx=0$$ Meanwhile $$int_{-pi}^pi cos^2(nx)dx=pi$$ This will allow you to complete $(2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014622%2fuse-orthogonality-to-proof-parsevals-identity-for-the-general-fourier-series-wr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$cos(nx-theta_n)=cos(nx)cos(theta_n)+sin(nx)sin(theta_n)$$
Therefore
$$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx-theta_n)cos(mx-theta_m)dx={cos(theta_n)cos(theta_m)int_{-pi}^pi left(cos(nx)cos(mx)right)dx quadtext{etc.}}$$
For $nne m$, $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)cos(mx)dx=0$$ and in general $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)sin(mx)dx=0$$ Meanwhile $$int_{-pi}^pi cos^2(nx)dx=pi$$ This will allow you to complete $(2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$cos(nx-theta_n)=cos(nx)cos(theta_n)+sin(nx)sin(theta_n)$$
Therefore
$$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx-theta_n)cos(mx-theta_m)dx={cos(theta_n)cos(theta_m)int_{-pi}^pi left(cos(nx)cos(mx)right)dx quadtext{etc.}}$$
For $nne m$, $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)cos(mx)dx=0$$ and in general $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)sin(mx)dx=0$$ Meanwhile $$int_{-pi}^pi cos^2(nx)dx=pi$$ This will allow you to complete $(2)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$cos(nx-theta_n)=cos(nx)cos(theta_n)+sin(nx)sin(theta_n)$$
Therefore
$$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx-theta_n)cos(mx-theta_m)dx={cos(theta_n)cos(theta_m)int_{-pi}^pi left(cos(nx)cos(mx)right)dx quadtext{etc.}}$$
For $nne m$, $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)cos(mx)dx=0$$ and in general $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)sin(mx)dx=0$$ Meanwhile $$int_{-pi}^pi cos^2(nx)dx=pi$$ This will allow you to complete $(2)$.
$endgroup$
$$cos(nx-theta_n)=cos(nx)cos(theta_n)+sin(nx)sin(theta_n)$$
Therefore
$$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx-theta_n)cos(mx-theta_m)dx={cos(theta_n)cos(theta_m)int_{-pi}^pi left(cos(nx)cos(mx)right)dx quadtext{etc.}}$$
For $nne m$, $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)cos(mx)dx=0$$ and in general $$int_{-pi}^pi cos(nx)sin(mx)dx=0$$ Meanwhile $$int_{-pi}^pi cos^2(nx)dx=pi$$ This will allow you to complete $(2)$.
edited Nov 26 '18 at 19:46
BLAZE
6,076112755
6,076112755
answered Nov 26 '18 at 17:49
herb steinbergherb steinberg
2,5582310
2,5582310
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
I don't know who edited my answer. Moreover I don't see the point of it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 26 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It was me that edited the format of your answer. Do you not agree that it is easier to read now? If not you can revert back to the original.
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 27 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
$begingroup$
It is just more spread out. I have found from past experience that reverting to the original is too troublesome, so leave it.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Nov 27 '18 at 16:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014622%2fuse-orthogonality-to-proof-parsevals-identity-for-the-general-fourier-series-wr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
You have to argue why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral, and then, as $cos$ is periodic, we get the same integrals for each $n$ if we drop $theta_n$..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Nov 26 '18 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Berci Thanks for your reply, I'm not sure why the infinite sum can be exchanged with the integral. In fact, I don't even understand what you mean by 'exchange'. Could you please elaborate on this in an answer?
$endgroup$
– BLAZE
Nov 26 '18 at 19:37