Tensor product terminology in category theory?
$begingroup$
Say that I have any homomorphisms of commutative rings, $A rightarrow B, A rightarrow C.$ I recently read that $B otimes_A C$ is the pushout of the morphisms in the category of commutative rings. However, I understood tensor products as defined for modules over a commutative ring. Can we somehow realize $B, C$ as modules over $A$ via the homomorphisms or is $B otimes_A C$ as defined by the pushout a generalization of the 'normal' definition of tensors? It seems unlikely that it is a generalization as it seems to depend on these morphisms whereas the tensors of modules doesn't depend on any sort of morphisms.
category-theory terminology tensor-products
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Say that I have any homomorphisms of commutative rings, $A rightarrow B, A rightarrow C.$ I recently read that $B otimes_A C$ is the pushout of the morphisms in the category of commutative rings. However, I understood tensor products as defined for modules over a commutative ring. Can we somehow realize $B, C$ as modules over $A$ via the homomorphisms or is $B otimes_A C$ as defined by the pushout a generalization of the 'normal' definition of tensors? It seems unlikely that it is a generalization as it seems to depend on these morphisms whereas the tensors of modules doesn't depend on any sort of morphisms.
category-theory terminology tensor-products
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Say that I have any homomorphisms of commutative rings, $A rightarrow B, A rightarrow C.$ I recently read that $B otimes_A C$ is the pushout of the morphisms in the category of commutative rings. However, I understood tensor products as defined for modules over a commutative ring. Can we somehow realize $B, C$ as modules over $A$ via the homomorphisms or is $B otimes_A C$ as defined by the pushout a generalization of the 'normal' definition of tensors? It seems unlikely that it is a generalization as it seems to depend on these morphisms whereas the tensors of modules doesn't depend on any sort of morphisms.
category-theory terminology tensor-products
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
$endgroup$
Say that I have any homomorphisms of commutative rings, $A rightarrow B, A rightarrow C.$ I recently read that $B otimes_A C$ is the pushout of the morphisms in the category of commutative rings. However, I understood tensor products as defined for modules over a commutative ring. Can we somehow realize $B, C$ as modules over $A$ via the homomorphisms or is $B otimes_A C$ as defined by the pushout a generalization of the 'normal' definition of tensors? It seems unlikely that it is a generalization as it seems to depend on these morphisms whereas the tensors of modules doesn't depend on any sort of morphisms.
category-theory terminology tensor-products
category-theory terminology tensor-products
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
edited Nov 25 '18 at 6:51
Shaun
8,888113681
8,888113681
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
伽罗瓦伽罗瓦
1,083615
1,083615
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take all rings here to be commutative. A ring homomorphism $f:Ato B$
makes $B$ into an $A$-module. In detail, the module action is $acdot b=f(a)b$.
With another ring homomorphism $g:Ato C$ then we have two $A$-modules,
and can form the tensor product $Botimes_A C$.
At first $Botimes_A C$ is just a module. But it has a multiplication,
defined as the composition
$$(Botimes_A C)times(Botimes_A C)to (Botimes_A C)otimes_A (Botimes_A C)
to (Botimes_A B)otimes_A (Cotimes_A C)to Botimes_A C.$$
The middle map is just permuting the factors, and the last map is induced
by $(botimes b')otimes(cotimes c')mapsto bb'otimes cc'$.
In terms of elements:
$$(botimes c)(b'otimes c')=bb'otimes cc'.$$
Then $Botimes_A C$ is a ring. There are ring homomorphisms from $B$
and $C$ to it, the first given by $amapsto aotimes 1_C$. Now one sits
down with a large sheet of paper, and proves that the map $Ato Botimes_A C$
is the pushout of $Ato B$ and $Ato C$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012515%2ftensor-product-terminology-in-category-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take all rings here to be commutative. A ring homomorphism $f:Ato B$
makes $B$ into an $A$-module. In detail, the module action is $acdot b=f(a)b$.
With another ring homomorphism $g:Ato C$ then we have two $A$-modules,
and can form the tensor product $Botimes_A C$.
At first $Botimes_A C$ is just a module. But it has a multiplication,
defined as the composition
$$(Botimes_A C)times(Botimes_A C)to (Botimes_A C)otimes_A (Botimes_A C)
to (Botimes_A B)otimes_A (Cotimes_A C)to Botimes_A C.$$
The middle map is just permuting the factors, and the last map is induced
by $(botimes b')otimes(cotimes c')mapsto bb'otimes cc'$.
In terms of elements:
$$(botimes c)(b'otimes c')=bb'otimes cc'.$$
Then $Botimes_A C$ is a ring. There are ring homomorphisms from $B$
and $C$ to it, the first given by $amapsto aotimes 1_C$. Now one sits
down with a large sheet of paper, and proves that the map $Ato Botimes_A C$
is the pushout of $Ato B$ and $Ato C$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take all rings here to be commutative. A ring homomorphism $f:Ato B$
makes $B$ into an $A$-module. In detail, the module action is $acdot b=f(a)b$.
With another ring homomorphism $g:Ato C$ then we have two $A$-modules,
and can form the tensor product $Botimes_A C$.
At first $Botimes_A C$ is just a module. But it has a multiplication,
defined as the composition
$$(Botimes_A C)times(Botimes_A C)to (Botimes_A C)otimes_A (Botimes_A C)
to (Botimes_A B)otimes_A (Cotimes_A C)to Botimes_A C.$$
The middle map is just permuting the factors, and the last map is induced
by $(botimes b')otimes(cotimes c')mapsto bb'otimes cc'$.
In terms of elements:
$$(botimes c)(b'otimes c')=bb'otimes cc'.$$
Then $Botimes_A C$ is a ring. There are ring homomorphisms from $B$
and $C$ to it, the first given by $amapsto aotimes 1_C$. Now one sits
down with a large sheet of paper, and proves that the map $Ato Botimes_A C$
is the pushout of $Ato B$ and $Ato C$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take all rings here to be commutative. A ring homomorphism $f:Ato B$
makes $B$ into an $A$-module. In detail, the module action is $acdot b=f(a)b$.
With another ring homomorphism $g:Ato C$ then we have two $A$-modules,
and can form the tensor product $Botimes_A C$.
At first $Botimes_A C$ is just a module. But it has a multiplication,
defined as the composition
$$(Botimes_A C)times(Botimes_A C)to (Botimes_A C)otimes_A (Botimes_A C)
to (Botimes_A B)otimes_A (Cotimes_A C)to Botimes_A C.$$
The middle map is just permuting the factors, and the last map is induced
by $(botimes b')otimes(cotimes c')mapsto bb'otimes cc'$.
In terms of elements:
$$(botimes c)(b'otimes c')=bb'otimes cc'.$$
Then $Botimes_A C$ is a ring. There are ring homomorphisms from $B$
and $C$ to it, the first given by $amapsto aotimes 1_C$. Now one sits
down with a large sheet of paper, and proves that the map $Ato Botimes_A C$
is the pushout of $Ato B$ and $Ato C$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
$endgroup$
Take all rings here to be commutative. A ring homomorphism $f:Ato B$
makes $B$ into an $A$-module. In detail, the module action is $acdot b=f(a)b$.
With another ring homomorphism $g:Ato C$ then we have two $A$-modules,
and can form the tensor product $Botimes_A C$.
At first $Botimes_A C$ is just a module. But it has a multiplication,
defined as the composition
$$(Botimes_A C)times(Botimes_A C)to (Botimes_A C)otimes_A (Botimes_A C)
to (Botimes_A B)otimes_A (Cotimes_A C)to Botimes_A C.$$
The middle map is just permuting the factors, and the last map is induced
by $(botimes b')otimes(cotimes c')mapsto bb'otimes cc'$.
In terms of elements:
$$(botimes c)(b'otimes c')=bb'otimes cc'.$$
Then $Botimes_A C$ is a ring. There are ring homomorphisms from $B$
and $C$ to it, the first given by $amapsto aotimes 1_C$. Now one sits
down with a large sheet of paper, and proves that the map $Ato Botimes_A C$
is the pushout of $Ato B$ and $Ato C$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:00
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k1059132
102k1059132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012515%2ftensor-product-terminology-in-category-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
