Questions about “Tracking-by-Detection”
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Recently I'm reading about tracking papers, and normally they followed "Tracking-by-Detection" method.
In "Tracking-by-Detection" when you get new detection result from detector, you need to match with already tracked object.
I just wonder if the detector try to detect object in next frame(t+1), but fail to detect object which already tracked object in previous frame(t)
In this case tracker will fail to keep tracking that object, because there is no detected object to match with tracked object.
So, In "Tracking-by-Detection" method, how to recover the detection fail case?
Thank you
tracking
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Recently I'm reading about tracking papers, and normally they followed "Tracking-by-Detection" method.
In "Tracking-by-Detection" when you get new detection result from detector, you need to match with already tracked object.
I just wonder if the detector try to detect object in next frame(t+1), but fail to detect object which already tracked object in previous frame(t)
In this case tracker will fail to keep tracking that object, because there is no detected object to match with tracked object.
So, In "Tracking-by-Detection" method, how to recover the detection fail case?
Thank you
tracking
1
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Recently I'm reading about tracking papers, and normally they followed "Tracking-by-Detection" method.
In "Tracking-by-Detection" when you get new detection result from detector, you need to match with already tracked object.
I just wonder if the detector try to detect object in next frame(t+1), but fail to detect object which already tracked object in previous frame(t)
In this case tracker will fail to keep tracking that object, because there is no detected object to match with tracked object.
So, In "Tracking-by-Detection" method, how to recover the detection fail case?
Thank you
tracking
Recently I'm reading about tracking papers, and normally they followed "Tracking-by-Detection" method.
In "Tracking-by-Detection" when you get new detection result from detector, you need to match with already tracked object.
I just wonder if the detector try to detect object in next frame(t+1), but fail to detect object which already tracked object in previous frame(t)
In this case tracker will fail to keep tracking that object, because there is no detected object to match with tracked object.
So, In "Tracking-by-Detection" method, how to recover the detection fail case?
Thank you
tracking
tracking
asked Nov 15 at 6:56
Dasol Han
63
63
1
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57
add a comment |
1
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57
1
1
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53313949%2fquestions-about-tracking-by-detection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
tracking: "DO NOT USE, since is considered too generic. Consider using a more specific tag such as video-tracking or bug-tracking instead."
– Damien_The_Unbeliever
Nov 15 at 6:57