Polarizing filter for TLR camera (Flexaret VII)
I recently purchased a Flexaret VII camera and now looking for polarizing filters. I could find color filters but not polarizing. Is there any alternative on the market, as I can't find any information on this topic?
film filters polarizer
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
add a comment |
I recently purchased a Flexaret VII camera and now looking for polarizing filters. I could find color filters but not polarizing. Is there any alternative on the market, as I can't find any information on this topic?
film filters polarizer
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
add a comment |
I recently purchased a Flexaret VII camera and now looking for polarizing filters. I could find color filters but not polarizing. Is there any alternative on the market, as I can't find any information on this topic?
film filters polarizer
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
I recently purchased a Flexaret VII camera and now looking for polarizing filters. I could find color filters but not polarizing. Is there any alternative on the market, as I can't find any information on this topic?
film filters polarizer
film filters polarizer
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
asked Jan 14 at 0:36
BobBob
80552342
80552342
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your camera uses B36 bayonet mount filters which are increasingly rare. I believe they are also called “Bayonet II”, or “Bay II”
There is a B36 PL filter available on eBay right now that I think would work for you BAY II Bay 2 Polarizer FILTER | B36
This person had a similar problem and the solution was to have a B36 filter adapter custom made. It happens to be for 62mm filters.
A 62mm filter would slightly obscure your viewing lens but you could have a smaller size made as well.
The best solution might be a ready made Bay II adapter: Camera-Depot
Ideally you could have one adapter for each lens but I think 49mm might be too large. There might be smaller sizes available some where as well.
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104262%2fpolarizing-filter-for-tlr-camera-flexaret-vii%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your camera uses B36 bayonet mount filters which are increasingly rare. I believe they are also called “Bayonet II”, or “Bay II”
There is a B36 PL filter available on eBay right now that I think would work for you BAY II Bay 2 Polarizer FILTER | B36
This person had a similar problem and the solution was to have a B36 filter adapter custom made. It happens to be for 62mm filters.
A 62mm filter would slightly obscure your viewing lens but you could have a smaller size made as well.
The best solution might be a ready made Bay II adapter: Camera-Depot
Ideally you could have one adapter for each lens but I think 49mm might be too large. There might be smaller sizes available some where as well.
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
add a comment |
Your camera uses B36 bayonet mount filters which are increasingly rare. I believe they are also called “Bayonet II”, or “Bay II”
There is a B36 PL filter available on eBay right now that I think would work for you BAY II Bay 2 Polarizer FILTER | B36
This person had a similar problem and the solution was to have a B36 filter adapter custom made. It happens to be for 62mm filters.
A 62mm filter would slightly obscure your viewing lens but you could have a smaller size made as well.
The best solution might be a ready made Bay II adapter: Camera-Depot
Ideally you could have one adapter for each lens but I think 49mm might be too large. There might be smaller sizes available some where as well.
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
add a comment |
Your camera uses B36 bayonet mount filters which are increasingly rare. I believe they are also called “Bayonet II”, or “Bay II”
There is a B36 PL filter available on eBay right now that I think would work for you BAY II Bay 2 Polarizer FILTER | B36
This person had a similar problem and the solution was to have a B36 filter adapter custom made. It happens to be for 62mm filters.
A 62mm filter would slightly obscure your viewing lens but you could have a smaller size made as well.
The best solution might be a ready made Bay II adapter: Camera-Depot
Ideally you could have one adapter for each lens but I think 49mm might be too large. There might be smaller sizes available some where as well.
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
Your camera uses B36 bayonet mount filters which are increasingly rare. I believe they are also called “Bayonet II”, or “Bay II”
There is a B36 PL filter available on eBay right now that I think would work for you BAY II Bay 2 Polarizer FILTER | B36
This person had a similar problem and the solution was to have a B36 filter adapter custom made. It happens to be for 62mm filters.
A 62mm filter would slightly obscure your viewing lens but you could have a smaller size made as well.
The best solution might be a ready made Bay II adapter: Camera-Depot
Ideally you could have one adapter for each lens but I think 49mm might be too large. There might be smaller sizes available some where as well.
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
edited Jan 14 at 2:35
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
answered Jan 14 at 1:54
Mike SowsunMike Sowsun
7,8161825
7,8161825
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
add a comment |
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
Interesting about the B36–62mm adapter. But wouldn't the "step-up" obscure the TLR's viewing lens?
– scottbb
Jan 14 at 1:56
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
thanks a lot mate, I was not hoping for an answer on this topic
– Bob
Jan 16 at 0:18
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
"that person" is active on this forum as well :) the Flexaret bay is proprietary. I have never seen a real Flexaret polarizer - only listed in sales materials. I suspect they were made in very, very low numbers from materials imported from the West (we are talking deep socialism, with serious shortages of just about everything). At present a step down adapter is the only option. 62mm is huge, but it doesn't obstruct view. 49mm is more common, as 49mm was standard filter size for Prakticas and there are tons of 49mm filters around in Czech.
– Jindra Lacko
Jan 16 at 9:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104262%2fpolarizing-filter-for-tlr-camera-flexaret-vii%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
