Could anyone (non-military) in the present day “exceed mach 1 over a regulated area”?
There is a question What would happen if I exceeded mach 1 over a regulated area?
I wonder, could anyone in civil aviation (not military) actually carry out this violation? I know there are privately owned "warbirds", but it looks like the majority of them are really old. The "never exceed" velocity is defined well below Mach 1 for majority of these planes.
Are there any cases known where someone non-military owns an aircraft that could exceed the speed of sound and then land at least mostly in one piece?
Let's limit the scope of the question to USA and Europe.
supersonic
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
add a comment |
There is a question What would happen if I exceeded mach 1 over a regulated area?
I wonder, could anyone in civil aviation (not military) actually carry out this violation? I know there are privately owned "warbirds", but it looks like the majority of them are really old. The "never exceed" velocity is defined well below Mach 1 for majority of these planes.
Are there any cases known where someone non-military owns an aircraft that could exceed the speed of sound and then land at least mostly in one piece?
Let's limit the scope of the question to USA and Europe.
supersonic
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
2
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
3
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30
add a comment |
There is a question What would happen if I exceeded mach 1 over a regulated area?
I wonder, could anyone in civil aviation (not military) actually carry out this violation? I know there are privately owned "warbirds", but it looks like the majority of them are really old. The "never exceed" velocity is defined well below Mach 1 for majority of these planes.
Are there any cases known where someone non-military owns an aircraft that could exceed the speed of sound and then land at least mostly in one piece?
Let's limit the scope of the question to USA and Europe.
supersonic
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
There is a question What would happen if I exceeded mach 1 over a regulated area?
I wonder, could anyone in civil aviation (not military) actually carry out this violation? I know there are privately owned "warbirds", but it looks like the majority of them are really old. The "never exceed" velocity is defined well below Mach 1 for majority of these planes.
Are there any cases known where someone non-military owns an aircraft that could exceed the speed of sound and then land at least mostly in one piece?
Let's limit the scope of the question to USA and Europe.
supersonic
supersonic
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
edited Dec 30 '18 at 13:09
John Dallman
45036
45036
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:16
h22
5,35712866
5,35712866
2
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
3
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30
add a comment |
2
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
3
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30
2
2
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
3
3
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes, In the U.S.A there are many privately owned ex-military jet fighters that are capable of exceeding Mach 1. It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities.
You can search the FAA civil registry by type: FAA REGISTRY
Make / Model Inquiry
Here is just a partial list of privately owned supersonic jet fighters in the United States:
Douglas A-4
Lockheed F-104
McDonnell F-4
NORTHROP F-5
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-21
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-23
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-29
Sukhoi SU-27
These two aircraft are owned by the Collings Foundation in Florida and are available for airshow demonstrations.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
|
show 4 more comments
You can do it in Russia - https://migflug.com/jetflights/how-do-i-book-a-fighter-jet-flight, free bonus you will see earth from space)
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58468%2fcould-anyone-non-military-in-the-present-day-exceed-mach-1-over-a-regulated-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, In the U.S.A there are many privately owned ex-military jet fighters that are capable of exceeding Mach 1. It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities.
You can search the FAA civil registry by type: FAA REGISTRY
Make / Model Inquiry
Here is just a partial list of privately owned supersonic jet fighters in the United States:
Douglas A-4
Lockheed F-104
McDonnell F-4
NORTHROP F-5
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-21
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-23
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-29
Sukhoi SU-27
These two aircraft are owned by the Collings Foundation in Florida and are available for airshow demonstrations.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
|
show 4 more comments
Yes, In the U.S.A there are many privately owned ex-military jet fighters that are capable of exceeding Mach 1. It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities.
You can search the FAA civil registry by type: FAA REGISTRY
Make / Model Inquiry
Here is just a partial list of privately owned supersonic jet fighters in the United States:
Douglas A-4
Lockheed F-104
McDonnell F-4
NORTHROP F-5
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-21
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-23
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-29
Sukhoi SU-27
These two aircraft are owned by the Collings Foundation in Florida and are available for airshow demonstrations.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
|
show 4 more comments
Yes, In the U.S.A there are many privately owned ex-military jet fighters that are capable of exceeding Mach 1. It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities.
You can search the FAA civil registry by type: FAA REGISTRY
Make / Model Inquiry
Here is just a partial list of privately owned supersonic jet fighters in the United States:
Douglas A-4
Lockheed F-104
McDonnell F-4
NORTHROP F-5
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-21
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-23
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-29
Sukhoi SU-27
These two aircraft are owned by the Collings Foundation in Florida and are available for airshow demonstrations.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
Yes, In the U.S.A there are many privately owned ex-military jet fighters that are capable of exceeding Mach 1. It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities.
You can search the FAA civil registry by type: FAA REGISTRY
Make / Model Inquiry
Here is just a partial list of privately owned supersonic jet fighters in the United States:
Douglas A-4
Lockheed F-104
McDonnell F-4
NORTHROP F-5
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-21
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-23
MIKOYAN-GUREVICH MIG-29
Sukhoi SU-27
These two aircraft are owned by the Collings Foundation in Florida and are available for airshow demonstrations.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
edited Dec 28 '18 at 16:59
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:45
Mike Sowsun
17.8k25776
17.8k25776
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
|
show 4 more comments
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
1
1
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
"It is quite conceivable that a privately owned fighter jet has exceeded Mach 1 but not reported it or been caught by the authorities." - Really? I would have assumed that all jets (especially ex-military types) would be monitored by local ATC, and they'd notice someone going Mach 1+, no? Or is it more passive and they'd only notice that if they're actively watching that specific plane?
– BruceWayne
Dec 28 '18 at 17:10
10
10
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
ATC radar wouldn't catch it, since they see ground speed and know neither your head/tail wind component nor the exact temperature at your altitude (which determines the speed of sound). If you're flying SR-71 speeds, then yeah they'd notice, but the difference between M 0.95 and M 1.05 isn't enough that they'd notice. You'd be far more likely to be "busted" based on noise complaints from the ground.
– Ralph J
Dec 28 '18 at 18:14
6
6
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
@Ralph J: And if you happened to do your flying at low level over an unpopulated area - say the Black Rock desert - you might not even show up on radar - civil, at least: IDK about military. FTM, mach 1 has been exceeded on the ground there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC Which raises the question of whether that's a violation of the FAA rule or not. And then there are the various private suborbital spacecraft...
– jamesqf
Dec 28 '18 at 18:50
17
17
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
As much as I might dream of privately owning an SU-27, I don't think I'd be able to resist attempting maneuvers that would get me killed on the first day.
– Todd Wilcox
Dec 28 '18 at 19:56
1
1
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
@jamesqf Mach 8 has also been exceeded on the ground. :) Granted, it was not by a private individual.
– reirab
Dec 29 '18 at 2:16
|
show 4 more comments
You can do it in Russia - https://migflug.com/jetflights/how-do-i-book-a-fighter-jet-flight, free bonus you will see earth from space)
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
You can do it in Russia - https://migflug.com/jetflights/how-do-i-book-a-fighter-jet-flight, free bonus you will see earth from space)
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
You can do it in Russia - https://migflug.com/jetflights/how-do-i-book-a-fighter-jet-flight, free bonus you will see earth from space)
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
You can do it in Russia - https://migflug.com/jetflights/how-do-i-book-a-fighter-jet-flight, free bonus you will see earth from space)
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:53
Konstantin Demchenko
211
211
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
No on the "see earth from space". Only a relatively handful of flights of rocket powered aircraft throughout history have done so, and it's not yet a tourist option though that is being worked on. See earth from above enough atmosphere that it looks a bit like being in space? perhaps.
– Chris Stratton
Dec 29 '18 at 21:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58468%2fcould-anyone-non-military-in-the-present-day-exceed-mach-1-over-a-regulated-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Regardless of the "never exceed speed", it is possible for an aircraft to exceed the speed of sound, and the max speed, in a dive for example Are you asking if someone can exceed Mach 1 without exceeding the design limits of the aircraft?
– zymhan
Dec 28 '18 at 15:29
3
Commander Worf owns a jet capable of (just) exceeding Mach 1
– Richard
Dec 28 '18 at 22:15
I mean, "land at least mostly in one piece". Design limits, I assume, are defined for the reason.
– h22
Dec 29 '18 at 11:15
Felix Baumgartner reached Mach 1.25, jumping from an helium balloon. It happened in the US, and military wasn't involved as far as I can tell. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_Stratos
– Eric Duminil
Dec 29 '18 at 15:30